Head to head
MCP Browser vs Zenrows
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Browser automation using the user's Chromium session — JS execution, auth, and anti-bot support.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Zenrows MCP server — Fetch, Extract, Batch, and Browser Sessions for AI coding assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Zenrows (92/100 against 80). Zenrows is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Browser runs on your own machine.
| MCP Browser | Zenrows | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 19 |
| Downloads / week | 133 | 500 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 13 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-12 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |