Mmcp.market

Head to head

MCP Browser vs PyreCrawl

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

MCP Browserio.github.cherchyk/mcpbrowser
B
No reviews yet

Browser automation using the user's Chromium session — JS execution, auth, and anti-bot support.

Full listing
PyreCrawlio.github.SanggonBoy/PyreCrawl
A
No reviews yet

Web scraping + research toolkit for AI agents: scrape, crawl, monitor URLs with anti-bot bypass.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PyreCrawl (92/100 against 80).

 MCP BrowserPyreCrawl
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB80/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars916
Downloads / week133153
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools13—
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-08-122026-09-19
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

MCP Browser vs nodriver — undetected browser automationMCP Browser vs Slack MCP ServerMCP Browser vs CloakBrowser MCPMCP Browser vs ZenrowsMCP Browser vs Behavior Runtime MCPAll Scraping and browsing servers