Head to head
MCP Browser vs Behavior Runtime MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Browser automation using the user's Chromium session — JS execution, auth, and anti-bot support.
Full listingNo reviews yet
In-browser ~60Hz behavior tree execution engine with reactive triggers and safety guardrails.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Behavior Runtime MCP (94/100 against 80).
| MCP Browser | Behavior Runtime MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 133 | 4.2k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 13 | 10 |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-12 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |