MCP.Market

Head to head

Browserbase vs AIHawk

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Browserbaseio.github.browserbase/mcp-server-browserbase
C
No reviews yet

MCP server for AI web browser automation using Browserbase and Stagehand

Full listing
AIHawkio.github.feder-cr/aihawk
A
No reviews yet

AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours AIHawk (88/100 against 62). AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.

 BrowserbaseAIHawk
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC62/100A88/100
AdoptionEstablishedWidely used
GitHub stars3.4k33k
Downloads / week7636.0k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools12—
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-07-202026-11-13
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Browserbase vs Browser UseBrowserbase vs SeleniumBase MCPBrowserbase vs Web Browser (kogiQA)Browserbase vs ScrapelessBrowserbase vs FouraAll Scraping and browsing servers