Head to head
Apify MCP Server vs Firecrawl MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Extract data from any website with thousands of scrapers, crawlers, and automations on Apify Store ⚡
Full listing
No reviews yet
Firecrawl, the context API for AI agents: search, scrape, interact with the web, plus paper search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Apify MCP Server (100/100 against 90). Firecrawl MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Apify MCP Server | Firecrawl MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 16k | 7.8k |
| Downloads / week | – | 159k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-11-13 | 2026-11-03 |
| Category | E-commerce | Scraping and browsing |