Mmcp.market

Head to head

Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs mcp

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCPio.github.Ansarii/firecrawl-stealth-mcp
F
No reviews yet

WAF-bypass web scraper and passive URL mapper for AI agents with zero pay-on-fail.

Full listing
mcpio.github.webdriverio/mcp
A
No reviews yet

MCP server with WebdriverIO for browser and mobile app automation (iOS/Android via Appium)

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp (86/100 against 17). Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp runs on your own machine. mcp has noticeably more public adoption.

 Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCPmcp
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeF17/100A86/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–39
Downloads / week–5.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-16
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs playwright-mcpFirecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs Ui.Vision MCPFirecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs AIHawkFirecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs SeleniumBase MCPFirecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs safari-mcpAll Scraping and browsing servers