Head to head
Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs SeleniumBase MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
WAF-bypass web scraper and passive URL mapper for AI agents with zero pay-on-fail.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SeleniumBase MCP (78/100 against 17). Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; SeleniumBase MCP runs on your own machine. SeleniumBase MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP | SeleniumBase MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | F17/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 13k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |