Mmcp.market

Head to head

Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs AIHawk

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCPio.github.Ansarii/firecrawl-stealth-mcp
F
No reviews yet

WAF-bypass web scraper and passive URL mapper for AI agents with zero pay-on-fail.

Full listing
AIHawkio.github.feder-cr/aihawk
A
No reviews yet

AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours AIHawk (92/100 against 17). Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; AIHawk runs on your own machine. AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.

 Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCPAIHawk
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeF17/100A92/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–32k
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Firecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs playwright-mcpFirecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs Ui.Vision MCPFirecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs SeleniumBase MCPFirecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs safari-mcpFirecrawl Alternative Stealth MCP vs Agent360 Browser MCPAll Scraping and browsing servers