Mmcp.market

Head to head

Healthclaw Guardrails vs Canary

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Healthclaw Guardrailsio.github.aks129/healthclaw-guardrails
A
No reviews yet

Guardrailed FHIR access for AI agents: PHI redaction, audit trail, step-up auth, tenant isolation

Full listing
Canaryio.github.mindstone/mcp-server-canary
A
No reviews yet

Mindstone-internal release-pipeline test connector; not for use. Single ping tool; no auth.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (87 and 94 out of 100). Healthclaw Guardrails is hosted and callable through the gateway; Canary runs on your own machine.

 Healthclaw GuardrailsCanary
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA87/100A94/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars3012
Downloads / week–41
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—1
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-252026-09-13
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Healthclaw Guardrails vs BastionHealthclaw Guardrails vs ssh-mcpHealthclaw Guardrails vs RedeHealthclaw Guardrails vs Mastyf AIHealthclaw Guardrails vs spintax.net MCP serverAll Security servers