Head to head
Myc vs Sequential Thinking Working Notes
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Myc
Cio.github.aistastudio/mycNo reviews yet
Task queue, decisions and memory for coding agents. Local SQLite, no network. Requires Bun.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local working notes, decisions, evidence and resumable sessions with SQLite persistence.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Sequential Thinking Working Notes (92/100 against 66).
| Myc | Sequential Thinking Working Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C66/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 14 | 959 |
| Downloads / week | 1.1k | 247 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 13 | 11 |
| Write actions | 2 | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-10-23 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |