Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agentic Reputation Gateway vs three.ws Provenance

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agentic Reputation Gatewayio.github.agenticsubstrate/reputation-gateway
C
No reviews yet

Read-only gateway for durable agent identity, consent, recognized work, and signed receipts.

Full listing
three.ws Provenanceio.github.nirholas/provenance-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Append-only, signed, on-chain-verifiable agent action log — record and audit what agents did.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours three.ws Provenance (83/100 against 67). Agentic Reputation Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Provenance runs on your own machine. three.ws Provenance has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agentic Reputation Gatewaythree.ws Provenance
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100B83/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–206
Downloads / week–29
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools7—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—Apache-2.0
Last release—2026-09-22
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Agentic Reputation Gateway vs Emilia ProtocolAgentic Reputation Gateway vs Agent-Native ChatAgentic Reputation Gateway vs Agoragentic Agent OS MCPAgentic Reputation Gateway vs PDFAgentic Reputation Gateway vs AuscaAll AI and agents servers