Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agentic Reputation Gateway vs Ausca

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agentic Reputation Gatewayio.github.agenticsubstrate/reputation-gateway
C
No reviews yet

Read-only gateway for durable agent identity, consent, recognized work, and signed receipts.

Full listing
Auscacom.ausca/agent-services
B
No reviews yet

Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Ausca (84/100 against 67). Ausca has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agentic Reputation GatewayAusca
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100B84/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–15
Downloads / week–220
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools7—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Agentic Reputation Gateway vs Emilia ProtocolAgentic Reputation Gateway vs Agent-Native ChatAgentic Reputation Gateway vs Agoragentic Agent OS MCPAgentic Reputation Gateway vs PDFAgentic Reputation Gateway vs three.ws ProvenanceAll AI and agents servers