Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agentic Reputation Gateway vs PDF

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agentic Reputation Gatewayio.github.agenticsubstrate/reputation-gateway
C
No reviews yet

Read-only gateway for durable agent identity, consent, recognized work, and signed receipts.

Full listing
PDFio.github.jztan/pdf-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Agentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PDF (85/100 against 67). Agentic Reputation Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; PDF runs on your own machine. PDF has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agentic Reputation GatewayPDF
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100A85/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–136
Downloads / week–1.2k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools7—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Agentic Reputation Gateway vs Emilia ProtocolAgentic Reputation Gateway vs Agent-Native ChatAgentic Reputation Gateway vs Agoragentic Agent OS MCPAgentic Reputation Gateway vs three.ws ProvenanceAgentic Reputation Gateway vs AuscaAll AI and agents servers