Head to head
Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs upkeep-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server
Bio.github.adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcpNo reviews yet
Self-hosted technical SEO audit MCP. 50+ checks, WAF detection, ephemeral. Built on LibreCrawl.
Full listingupkeep-mcp
Aio.github.tiagocalado86/upkeep-mcpNo reviews yet
Website maintenance checks: domains, SSL, uptime, technical SEO and accessibility
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours upkeep-mcp (92/100 against 70).
| Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server | upkeep-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 41 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 89 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 8 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |
Other comparisons
Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs CrawlieLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs SEO Audit ConsoleLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs SEO Tools: A-Parser bridgeLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs MCP ServerLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs NotipoAll SEO servers