Mmcp.market

Head to head

Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs SEO Tools: A-Parser bridge

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Serverio.github.adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Self-hosted technical SEO audit MCP. 50+ checks, WAF detection, ephemeral. Built on LibreCrawl.

Full listing
SEO Tools: A-Parser bridgeio.github.antohins/seo-tools-mcp-aparser
B
No reviews yet

Bridge to a self-hosted A-Parser: SERP, suggests and 150+ parsers via its API (read-only).

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SEO Tools: A-Parser bridge (83/100 against 70).

 Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP ServerSEO Tools: A-Parser bridge
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB70/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars413
Downloads / week–35
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—11
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-252026-09-18
CategorySEOSEO

Other comparisons

Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs CrawlieLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs SEO Audit ConsoleLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs MCP ServerLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs upkeep-mcpLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs NotipoAll SEO servers