Mmcp.market

Head to head

Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs Crawlie

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Serverio.github.adityaarsharma/librecrawl-technical-seo-audit-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Self-hosted technical SEO audit MCP. 50+ checks, WAF detection, ephemeral. Built on LibreCrawl.

Full listing
Crawlieapp.crawlie/crawlie
A
No reviews yet

Technical SEO + GEO (AI-search) site audits: hosted crawls, prioritized fixes, report diffs.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Crawlie (88/100 against 70). Crawlie is hosted and callable through the gateway; Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server runs on your own machine.

 Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP ServerCrawlie
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB70/100A88/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars41111
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-252026-07-18
CategorySEOSEO

Other comparisons

Librecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs SEO Audit ConsoleLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs SEO Tools: A-Parser bridgeLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs MCP ServerLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs upkeep-mcpLibrecrawl — Technical SEO Audit MCP Server vs NotipoAll SEO servers