Head to head
phi-guard-mcp vs NUM
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
phi-guard-mcp
Aio.github.Abidit/phi-guard-mcpNo reviews yet
Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics
Full listing
No reviews yet
Real places for your agent. Search 2.5M+ travel places; submit a business for human review.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (94 and 87 out of 100). NUM is hosted and callable through the gateway; phi-guard-mcp runs on your own machine.
| phi-guard-mcp | NUM | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A87/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |