Head to head
phi-guard-mcp vs ELSHWORK Agent Network
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
phi-guard-mcp
Aio.github.Abidit/phi-guard-mcpNo reviews yet
Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics
Full listingELSHWORK Agent Network
Ccom.elshwork/agent-networkNo reviews yet
MCP access to ELSHWORK agents, repositories, isolated runs, discovery and tasks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours phi-guard-mcp (94/100 against 65). ELSHWORK Agent Network is hosted and callable through the gateway; phi-guard-mcp runs on your own machine.
| phi-guard-mcp | ELSHWORK Agent Network | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |