Head to head
phi-guard-mcp vs x402 Trinity
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
phi-guard-mcp
Aio.github.Abidit/phi-guard-mcpNo reviews yet
Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics
Full listingx402 Trinity
Aio.github.devmster/x402-trinityNo reviews yet
Give an agent a wallet. Pays for x402 resources within hard limits. Base + USDC, gasless.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours phi-guard-mcp (94/100 against 86).
| phi-guard-mcp | x402 Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |