Head to head
phi-guard-mcp vs decaframe
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
phi-guard-mcp
Aio.github.Abidit/phi-guard-mcpNo reviews yet
Local-first PHI detection for source code, LLM prompts, logs, and analytics
Full listingdecaframe
Bcom.decaframe/decaframeNo reviews yet
Presentations, slides, reports and one-pagers your agent designs and you edit. Exports to one file.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours phi-guard-mcp (94/100 against 74).
| phi-guard-mcp | decaframe | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | B74/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |