Mmcp.market

crossing-the-chasm skill

by wondelai·wondelai/skills·2.3k stars·MIT

Navigate the technology adoption lifecycle from early adopters to mainstream market. Use when the user mentions "crossing the chasm", "beachhead segment", "whole product", "early adopters vs mainstream", "tech go-to-market", "bowling pin strategy", "technology adoption lifecycle", "pragmatist buyers", "growth stalled after early adopters", or "our go-to-market plan". Also trigger when planning go-to-market for a technical product. Covers the D-Day analogy, bowling-pin strategy, the tornado, and positioning against incumbents. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For new market creation, see blue-ocean-strategy.

A100/100content scan

Is the crossing-the-chasm skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 9 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the crossing-the-chasm skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description. 

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wondelai/skills.git /tmp/skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/skills/plugins/wondelai-skills/skills/crossing-the-chasm ~/.claude/skills/crossing-the-chasm
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Crossing the Chasm Framework

Strategic framework for marketing and selling disruptive technology products, particularly the transition from early adopters to mainstream customers.

Core Principle

There is a chasm between early adopters and the mainstream market. Most tech companies fail not because they can't build great products, but because they can't cross from visionaries who love new technology to pragmatists who just want solutions that work. The two groups want fundamentally different things -- what wins over innovators actively repels the early majority -- so you must change your strategy, and your whole product, to cross.

If the product is modern PLG/freemium B2B SaaS, read references/b2b-saas.md first -- it remaps every step below (the chasm, beachhead, whole product, metrics) for self-serve trials, free tiers, and the false-signal trap where 1,000 free users looks like a crossing but isn't.

Scoring

Goal: 10/10. Score any tech go-to-market by the Quick Diagnostic at the end: count the rows answered "yes" and map the 7 rows onto a 0-10 scale (roughly 1.4 points per satisfied row).

  • 9-10: single dominable beachhead chosen, 10+ in-segment references, whole product complete via partners, evolution-not-revolution positioning, pragmatist-aligned channel -- adoption is accelerating. You've crossed.
  • 5-6: beachhead picked but whole product or references still thin, or positioning still reads "revolutionary." You're mid-chasm; ship the missing whole-product layers and case studies.
  • <=3: multiple beachheads (or none), visionary messaging, MVP-grade product. Classic early-market tactics aimed at the mainstream -- the most common reason to stall.

Report the score, name the failing diagnostic rows, and give the fix for each.

The Technology Adoption Life Cycle

Innovators → Early Adopters → [CHASM] → Early Majority → Late Majority → Laggards
   2.5%         13.5%                      34%             34%            16%

The Chasm: The gap between early adopters (13.5%) and early majority (34%) -- where most tech products die.

The Five Buyer Groups

Critical insight: Early adopters and early majority look similar but want opposite things:

Why this matters: You can't market to both simultaneously -- visionary testimonials scare off pragmatists.

See: references/buyer-segments.md when you need to identify which group a specific prospect belongs to, or to write segment-specific messaging -- it has full psychographics and buying triggers per group.

The reference catch-22: Pragmatists won't buy without references from other pragmatists -- but none exist until someone crosses first. This is why the chasm is a chasm and not a slope: the social proof the early majority requires cannot accumulate gradually. Breaking it is the whole game (Steps 1-2 below).

The D-Day Strategy: Crossing the Chasm

Bad approach: Try to be everything to everyone (stall in the chasm). Good approach: Target a single beachhead, dominate it, expand from a position of strength.

Step 1: Target the Point of Attack

Choose a single, narrowly defined market segment.

Beachhead characteristics: specific ("orthopedic surgical centers with 5-10 surgeons", not "healthcare"); urgent, expensive pain; accessible via known channels; a compelling reason to buy (you're 10x better for their problem); whole-product potential via partners; vocal reference potential.

Example (Salesforce): not "CRM for all businesses" but "sales force automation for inside sales teams at B2B SaaS startups."

Process: Brainstorm 20+ segments, score each against the criteria, choose ONE (resist keeping options open), commit to dominating it.

See: references/beachhead-selection.md when running the brainstorm-and-score step above -- it has the scoring matrix, weighting, and the target-customer characterization worksheet to pick the one segment.

Step 2: Assemble the Invasion Force

Create the "whole product" for your beachhead segment.

Whole product layers: Generic (what you ship) → Expected (minimum viable) → Augmented (what pragmatists actually need) → Potential (what it could become).

Example: marketing automation software

Critical: The early majority buys the augmented product; ship only the generic and they won't buy.

Whole product checklist:

  • [ ] Core technology (your product)
  • [ ] Complementary products/services (integrations, partner solutions)
  • [ ] Installation and setup (onboarding, migration)
  • [ ] Training, support, documentation, best practices
  • [ ] Industry-specific adaptations
  • [ ] Risk mitigation (security, compliance, SLAs)

Partnerships: Identify gaps between generic and augmented, partner with companies that fill them, go to market jointly for the beachhead.

See: references/whole-product.md when mapping your gaps -- it extends the layers above with a 12-row gap-analysis matrix, the 80% rule, support-tier SLAs, and a planning canvas.

Step 3: Define the Battle

Position against the competition.

Positioning formula:

  • For [target customer]
  • Who [statement of need/opportunity]
  • Our product is a [product category]
  • That [statement of key benefit]
  • Unlike [primary competitive alternative]
  • Our product [statement of primary differentiation]

Example (early Workday): For mid-market companies who need modern HR and finance systems, Workday is a cloud-based ERP that delivers consumer-grade UX and fast implementation. Unlike Oracle and SAP, it requires no IT infrastructure and deploys in months, not years.

Competitive positioning: The market alternative is often NOT a direct competitor -- it's manual processes, spreadsheets, or legacy systems. Differentiate on a dimension you dominate and make the incumbent's strength irrelevant: Salesforce's "No software" positioning turned feature-rich Siebel's complexity into a weakness.

See: references/positioning.md when filling in the formula above or choosing the competitive alternative to displace -- it has the claim-and-evidence structure and the "make the incumbent's strength irrelevant" patterns.

Step 4: Launch the Invasion

Execute the go-to-market strategy.

For crossing (early majority): lead with references and case studies; message whole-product completeness, ease, and low risk; position as evolution ("Better X", not "new category"); prove with ROI calculators, free trials, pilots; sell through channels pragmatists trust (analysts, integrators, consultants).

Messaging shift:

See: references/go-to-market.md when building the launch plan -- it details channel selection by buyer type, the reference-and-case-study engine, and pricing/pilot tactics for pragmatists.

Bowling Pin Strategy

After dominating the beachhead, expand to adjacent segments -- each pin knocks down the next: Beachhead → Adjacent #1 → Adjacent #2 → Adjacent #3.

Adjacency criteria: similar needs (whole product transfers), reference credibility (beachhead customers influence the adjacent segment), incremental effort (don't start from scratch).

Example (Salesforce): inside sales at tech startups → inside sales at all B2B companies → all sales teams → customer service → marketing → full CRM platform.

Anti-pattern: Jumping to distant segments before dominating the beachhead.

See: references/expansion.md when sequencing your next 2-3 segments -- adjacency scoring and the bowling-pin ordering rules. For full worked arcs (Salesforce, VMware, Zoom, Atlassian) and stuck-in-the-chasm failures (Palm, Segway), see references/case-studies.md when you need a pattern-match for your own situation.

The Tornado: After the Chasm

Once you cross, demand accelerates (the "tornado"): rapid mainstream adoption, a shift from solution selling to product selling, commodity dynamics, and market-leader consolidation.

Strategic shift: before the chasm -- whole product, customization, high touch; during the tornado -- standardization, scalability, distribution.

Gorilla/chimp/monkey dynamics: the gorilla (market leader, 80%+ share) takes most of the profit; chimps (strong #2-#3) survive in niches; monkeys struggle. Become the gorilla in your beachhead, then expand.

Common Mistakes

Quick Diagnostic

Audit any tech go-to-market, and re-run it as the completion gate before declaring the chasm crossed. Each "If No" is a chasm symptom; act on the failing rows first.

Further Reading

More skills from wondelai/skills

  • A37signals-wayBuild lean, opinionated products using the 37signals philosophy from "Getting Real", "Rework", and "Shape Up". Use when the user mentions "Getting Real", "Rework", "Shape Up", "37signals", "Basecamp method", "six-week cycles", "fixed time variable scope", "appetite vs estimates", "betting table", "breadboarding", "fat marker sketch", "build less", "underdo the competition", "opinionated software", "we have too many meetings", "how do we ship faster", or "stop overbuilding". Also trigger when cutting scope to ship sooner, running a small team, or avoiding long-term roadmaps. Covers shaping, betting, building, and the art of saying no. For MVP validation, see lean-startup. For design sprints, see design-sprint.
  • A37signals-wayBuild lean, opinionated products using the 37signals philosophy from "Getting Real", "Rework", and "Shape Up". Use when the user mentions "Getting Real", "Rework", "Shape Up", "37signals", "Basecamp method", "six-week cycles", "fixed time variable scope", "appetite vs estimates", "betting table", "breadboarding", "fat marker sketch", "build less", "underdo the competition", "opinionated software", "we have too many meetings", "how do we ship faster", or "stop overbuilding". Also trigger when cutting scope to ship sooner, running a small team, or avoiding long-term roadmaps. Covers shaping, betting, building, and the art of saying no. For MVP validation, see lean-startup. For design sprints, see design-sprint.
  • A37signals-wayBuild lean, opinionated products using the 37signals philosophy from "Getting Real", "Rework", and "Shape Up". Use when the user mentions "Getting Real", "Rework", "Shape Up", "37signals", "Basecamp method", "six-week cycles", "fixed time variable scope", "appetite vs estimates", "betting table", "breadboarding", "fat marker sketch", "build less", "underdo the competition", "opinionated software", "we have too many meetings", "how do we ship faster", or "stop overbuilding". Also trigger when cutting scope to ship sooner, running a small team, or avoiding long-term roadmaps. Covers shaping, betting, building, and the art of saying no. For MVP validation, see lean-startup. For design sprints, see design-sprint.
  • Aarchitecture-optimizationGuided journey from a working codebase grown slow and tangled to one measurably fast, cleanly bounded, and readable. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-architecture, software-design-philosophy, refactoring-patterns, system-design, ddia-systems, release-it, pragmatic-programmer - every phase carries its method inline so it runs standalone, asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (PERFORMANCE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, ARCHITECTURE-OPTIMIZATION-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to make an app faster, untangle drifted boundaries, fix slow endpoints and queries, or says ''it works but it is slow and getting worse''. For an untested prototype, improve-code-quality; for an aged codebase you fear to touch, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for marketing-site page speed, improve-website. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
  • Aarchitecture-optimizationGuided journey from a working codebase grown slow and tangled to one measurably fast, cleanly bounded, and readable. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-architecture, software-design-philosophy, refactoring-patterns, system-design, ddia-systems, release-it, pragmatic-programmer - every phase carries its method inline so it runs standalone, asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (PERFORMANCE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, ARCHITECTURE-OPTIMIZATION-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to make an app faster, untangle drifted boundaries, fix slow endpoints and queries, or says ''it works but it is slow and getting worse''. For an untested prototype, improve-code-quality; for an aged codebase you fear to touch, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for marketing-site page speed, improve-website. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
  • Aarchitecture-optimizationGuided journey from a working codebase grown slow and tangled to one measurably fast, cleanly bounded, and readable. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-architecture, software-design-philosophy, refactoring-patterns, system-design, ddia-systems, release-it, pragmatic-programmer - every phase carries its method inline so it runs standalone, asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (PERFORMANCE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, ARCHITECTURE-OPTIMIZATION-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to make an app faster, untangle drifted boundaries, fix slow endpoints and queries, or says ''it works but it is slow and getting worse''. For an untested prototype, improve-code-quality; for an aged codebase you fear to touch, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for marketing-site page speed, improve-website. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
  • Ablue-ocean-strategyCreate uncontested market space using value innovation instead of competing head-to-head. Use when the user mentions "blue ocean", "red ocean", "strategy canvas", "ERRC framework", "value innovation", "non-customers", "buyer utility map", "the market is too crowded", "how do we stand out", or "escape the price war". Also trigger when exploring a new market category, or finding underserved or non-customers. Covers the Four Actions Framework, Six Paths, buyer utility map, and value-cost trade-offs. For real strategy formulation and bad-strategy detection, see good-strategy-bad-strategy. For tech adoption strategy, see crossing-the-chasm. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome.
  • Ablue-ocean-strategyCreate uncontested market space using value innovation instead of competing head-to-head. Use when the user mentions "blue ocean", "red ocean", "strategy canvas", "ERRC framework", "value innovation", "non-customers", "buyer utility map", "the market is too crowded", "how do we stand out", or "escape the price war". Also trigger when exploring a new market category, or finding underserved or non-customers. Covers the Four Actions Framework, Six Paths, buyer utility map, and value-cost trade-offs. For real strategy formulation and bad-strategy detection, see good-strategy-bad-strategy. For tech adoption strategy, see crossing-the-chasm. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome.
  • Ablue-ocean-strategyCreate uncontested market space using value innovation instead of competing head-to-head. Use when the user mentions "blue ocean", "red ocean", "strategy canvas", "ERRC framework", "value innovation", "non-customers", "buyer utility map", "the market is too crowded", "how do we stand out", or "escape the price war". Also trigger when exploring a new market category, or finding underserved or non-customers. Covers the Four Actions Framework, Six Paths, buyer utility map, and value-cost trade-offs. For real strategy formulation and bad-strategy detection, see good-strategy-bad-strategy. For tech adoption strategy, see crossing-the-chasm. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome.
  • Aclean-architectureStructure software around the Dependency Rule: source code dependencies point inward from frameworks to use cases to entities. Use when the user mentions "architecture layers", "dependency rule", "ports and adapters (hexagonal)", "onion architecture", "screaming architecture", "where should business logic go", "decouple from the database", "swap the framework without a rewrite", or "keep business rules independent". Also trigger when deciding which layer code belongs in, isolating core logic from infrastructure, defining module boundaries, or debating whether the framework should call your code or the reverse. Covers component principles, boundaries, and SOLID. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For domain modeling, see domain-driven-design.
  • Aclean-architectureStructure software around the Dependency Rule: source code dependencies point inward from frameworks to use cases to entities. Use when the user mentions "architecture layers", "dependency rule", "ports and adapters (hexagonal)", "onion architecture", "screaming architecture", "where should business logic go", "decouple from the database", "swap the framework without a rewrite", or "keep business rules independent". Also trigger when deciding which layer code belongs in, isolating core logic from infrastructure, defining module boundaries, or debating whether the framework should call your code or the reverse. Covers component principles, boundaries, and SOLID. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For domain modeling, see domain-driven-design.
  • Aclean-architectureStructure software around the Dependency Rule: source code dependencies point inward from frameworks to use cases to entities. Use when the user mentions "architecture layers", "dependency rule", "ports and adapters (hexagonal)", "onion architecture", "screaming architecture", "where should business logic go", "decouple from the database", "swap the framework without a rewrite", or "keep business rules independent". Also trigger when deciding which layer code belongs in, isolating core logic from infrastructure, defining module boundaries, or debating whether the framework should call your code or the reverse. Covers component principles, boundaries, and SOLID. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For domain modeling, see domain-driven-design.

All agent skills → · MCP servers