offensive-race-condition skill
No description in the SKILL.md.
Is the offensive-race-condition skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.
- low
SKILL.md:1The name should be 1 to 64 lowercase letters, digits or hyphens.
(missing) - low
SKILL.md:1No description, so an agent cannot tell when to use the skill.
(missing)
Install the offensive-race-condition skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red.git /tmp/Claude-Red mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Claude-Red/Skills/web/offensive-race-condition ~/.claude/skills/offensive-race-condition
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
SKILL: Race Conditions
Metadata
- Skill Name: race-condition
- Folder: offensive-race-condition
- Source: https://github.com/SnailSploit/offensive-checklist/blob/main/race-condition.md
Description
Race condition (TOCTOU) testing checklist: identifying timing windows, Burp Suite Turbo Intruder, Last-Byte sync technique, rate limit bypass, double-spend attacks, and concurrent request exploitation. Use for web app race condition testing or bug bounty time-of-check-to-time-of-use bugs.
Trigger Phrases
Use this skill when the conversation involves any of: race condition, TOCTOU, timing attack, Turbo Intruder, last-byte sync, rate limit bypass, double spend, concurrent request, race window, time of check, time of use
Instructions for Claude
When this skill is active:
- Load and apply the full methodology below as your operational checklist
- Follow steps in order unless the user specifies otherwise
- For each technique, consider applicability to the current target/context
- Track which checklist items have been completed
- Suggest next steps based on findings
Full Methodology
Race Conditions
Shortcut
- Spot the features prone to race conditions in the target application and copy the corresponding requests.
- Send multiple of these critical requests to the server simultaneously. You should craft requests that should be allowed once but not allowed multiple times.
- Check the results to see if your attack has succeeded. And try to execute the attack multiple times to maximize the chance of success.
- Consider the impact of the race condition you just found.
Mechanisms
Race conditions occur when the behavior of a system depends on the relative timing or sequence of events that can happen in different orders. In web application security, race conditions happen when multiple concurrent processes or threads access and manipulate the same resource simultaneously without proper synchronization.
sequenceDiagram
participant Thread1 as Thread 1
participant Resource
participant Thread2 as Thread 2
Thread1->>Resource: Read value (100)
Thread2->>Resource: Read value (100)
Thread1->>Thread1: Calculate new value (100-10=90)
Thread2->>Thread2: Calculate new value (100-10=90)
Thread1->>Resource: Write new value (90)
Thread2->>Resource: Write new value (90)
Note over Resource: Expected final value: 80<br/>Actual final value: 90A race condition becomes a security vulnerability when it affects security controls or business logic. The critical types include:
- Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU): When a check is performed, but circumstances change before the result of the check is used
- Read-Modify-Write: When multiple processes read, modify, and write back a shared resource without coordination
- Thread Safety Issues: When multithreaded applications improperly handle shared resources
- Resource Allocation Races: Competition for limited resources like database connections or memory
graph TD
subgraph "Common Race Condition Types"
A[Race Conditions] --> B[TOCTOU]
A --> C[Read-Modify-Write]
A --> D[Thread Safety Issues]
A --> E[Resource Allocation]
B --> B1["Check balance, then debit"]
C --> C1["Update counter or balance"]
D --> D1["Shared cache or session data"]
E --> E1["Limited coupon or inventory"]
endCommon vulnerable scenarios include:
- Account Balance Manipulation: Making multiple withdrawals/transfers simultaneously
- Coupon/Promotion Code Reuse: Using a single-use code multiple times
- File Upload Processing: Uploading and accessing temporary files before validation completes
- Registration Processes: Creating multiple accounts with the same unique identifier
- Token Verification: Using authentication tokens multiple times before they're invalidated
Hunt
Identifying Race Condition Vulnerabilities
Target Functionality Selection
Focus on features handling state changes, limited resources, or critical operations:
- Financial Transactions: Fund transfers, withdrawals, purchases
- Inventory Systems: Stock allocation, reservation systems
- Coupon/Points Systems: Redeeming coupons, points, or rewards
- Voting/Rating Systems: Likes, upvotes, downvotes, polls
- Membership/Subscription Actions: Inviting users, joining/leaving groups, following/unfollowing users
- Registration Systems: Account creation with unique attributes
- Resource Management: Uploading, processing, or accessing resources
- Rate-Limited Actions: Password resets, login attempts, API endpoints with usage limits
Testing Prerequisites
- Tools for sending parallel requests:
- Burp Suite Turbo Intruder or Repeater (multi-threaded)
- Custom scripts with threading capabilities
- Race condition testing frameworks (e.g., Racepwn)
- Request capturing and analysis capabilities:
- HTTP proxy for intercepting and modifying traffic
- Response analysis tools for detecting race-related anomalies
- Network Proximity: Consider the physical or network location of your testing infrastructure relative to the target server. Minimizing latency (e.g., using a VPS in the same region/provider as the target) can significantly increase the chances of winning a race condition.
Testing Methodology
flowchart TD
A[Race Condition Testing] --> B[Baseline Analysis]
A --> C[Race Condition Detection]
A --> D[Timing Manipulation]
A --> E[Proof of Concept]
B --> B1[Identify state-changing operations]
B --> B2[Document normal transaction flow]
C --> C1[Send identical requests simultaneously]
C --> C2[Observe state changes]
D --> D1[Identify critical timing windows]
D --> D2[Vary delays between requests]
E --> E1[Create reproducible exploit]
E --> E2[Document impact scenarios]- Baseline Behavior Analysis:
- Identify state-changing operations
- Understand normal request/response patterns
- Document application's standard transaction flow
- Race Condition Detection:
- Send identical requests simultaneously (10-100 threads)
- Observe effects on application state
- Look for anomalies in responses or state changes
- Timing Manipulation:
- Identify critical timing windows
- Target synchronization points
- Test with varying delays between requests
Advanced Testing Techniques
API-Based Race Condition Testing
- Identify stateful API endpoints
- Create automated scripts for parallel API requests:
import requests
import threading
def make_request():
requests.post('https://target.com/api/redeem',
json={'coupon_code': 'ONCE123'},
headers={'Authorization': 'Bearer token'})
threads = []
for _ in range(20):
t = threading.Thread(target=make_request)
threads.append(t)
t.start()
for t in threads:
t.join()Transaction-Based Race Condition Testing
- Identify multi-step transactions
- Find the critical state change requests
- Execute the final step in parallel before state updates propagate:
Step 1: Start purchase (single request)
Step 2: Apply coupon (single request)
Step 3: Send 20 simultaneous "confirm order" requestsThread Synchronization Testing
Create coordinated attacks that target specific timing windows:
import requests
import threading
import time
start_gate = threading.Event()
def synchronized_request():
start_gate.wait() # All threads wait here until flag is set
requests.post('https://target.com/api/withdraw',
json={'amount': '100'},
headers={'Authorization': 'Bearer token'})
threads = []
for _ in range(50):
t = threading.Thread(target=synchronized_request)
t.daemon = True
threads.append(t)
t.start()
# Release all threads simultaneously
time.sleep(2) # Ensure all threads are waiting
start_gate.set()Network-Level Timing Manipulation
Beyond application-level threading, manipulating network-level timing can be effective:
- HTTP/2 / HTTP/3 Single-Packet & Last-Byte-Sync Techniques: Classic HTTP/1.1 pipelining is disabled on most servers. Modern testers rely on HTTP/2 multiplexing or HTTP/3 streams to achieve micro-second concurrency. Burp Repeater (2023.9+) and Turbo Intruder expose this as Send group in parallel (single-packet attack).
- Last-Byte-Sync / Request Splitting: Open multiple connections, send almost-complete requests, then flush the final bytes simultaneously. In Burp, send each tab using the single packet attack gate; or in Turbo Intruder:
def queueRequests(target, wordlists):
engine = RequestEngine(
endpoint=target.endpoint,
concurrentConnections=1,
engine=Engine.BURP2)
for _ in range(20):
engine.queue(target.req, gate='race')
engine.openGate('race')Rate-Limiter and CAPTCHA Races
- Send concurrent login or OTP requests across multiple sessions/IPs to probe shared counters.
- Look for global vs per-user vs per-IP buckets; test burst vs sustained patterns.
Vulnerabilities
Common Race Condition Vulnerability Patterns
graph LR
subgraph "Race Condition Vulnerability Impacts"
A[Race Conditions] --> B[Financial Systems]
A --> C[Account & Authentication]
A --> D[Resource Management]
A --> E[Application-Specific]
A --> F[Rate Limiting & Anti-Automation]
B --> B1[Double Withdrawal]
B --> B2[Transaction Rollback Abuse]
C --> C1[Multiple Account Creation]
C --> C2[Token Reuse]
C --> C3[MFA Bypass]
D --> D1[Upload-Download Race]
D --> D2[Resource Over-allocation]
E --> E1[Shopping Cart Race]
E --> E2[Auction Sniping]
F --> F1[OTP/Reset Code Reuse]
F --> F2[CAPTCHA Reuse]
endMore skills from SnailSploit/Claude-Red
- Aoffensive-active-directoryActive Directory attack methodology for internal network red team engagements. Covers reconnaissance (BloodHound, PowerView, ADExplorer), credential abuse (Kerberoasting, ASREProasting, NTLM relay, LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning), privilege escalation (ACL abuse, GPO abuse, unconstrained/constrained delegation), lateral movement (Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, Overpass-the-Hash, WMI/WinRM/PsExec), persistence (Golden/Silver/Diamond Tickets, DCSync, DCShadow, AdminSDHolder, Skeleton Key), forest trust attacks, ADCS abuse (ESC1-ESC15), and modern MDI/Defender for Identity evasion. Use when assessing on-prem AD, hybrid AD/Entra ID environments, or ADCS deployments.
- Aoffensive-advanced-redteamComprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.
- Coffensive-ai-security
- Aoffensive-anti-forensicsAnti-forensics and evidence destruction techniques for red team operators conducting authorized engagements. Covers log clearing on Windows (wevtutil, Clear-EventLog, ETW provider patching) and Linux (journal truncation, utmp/wtmp binary editing, syslog manipulation), timestamp manipulation via Timestomp and SetMACE to defeat timeline analysis, filesystem-level anti-forensics including NTFS Alternate Data Streams for payload hiding and secure deletion with sdelete/shred, memory artifact removal to counter live forensics, disk artifact manipulation targeting MFT entries and USN journal records, network forensics evasion through encrypted C2 channels and DNS-over-HTTPS tunneling, and anti-VM/sandbox detection to avoid dynamic analysis environments. Tools: Timestomp, wevtutil, sdelete, shred, MimiPenguin, Invoke-Phant0m. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1070 (Indicator Removal), T1027 (Obfuscated Files or Information), T1497 (Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion). Each technique includes the forensic artifact it targets, the destruction or manipulation method, and the defender perspective so operators understand detection gaps they must account for.
- Aoffensive-api-abuseAdvanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for authorized penetration testers targeting business logic layers that automated scanners miss.
- Aoffensive-api-securityComprehensive API security testing methodology covering REST, gRPC, and WebSocket attack surfaces. Addresses the full OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, excessive data exposure, rate limiting bypass, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF, and security misconfiguration. Includes REST-specific attacks such as HTTP verb tampering, content-type switching, and parameter pollution. Covers gRPC exploitation through protobuf interception, reflection API enumeration, and metadata injection. Addresses WebSocket vulnerabilities including origin bypass, message injection, and cross-site WebSocket hijacking. Provides tooling guidance for Burp Suite, Postman, grpcurl, websocat, and mitmproxy. Each technique includes detection signatures and defensive indicators so you understand what artifacts your testing leaves behind. Designed for authorized penetration testing engagements against API-driven architectures.
- Aoffensive-bluetooth-bleBluetooth Low Energy (BLE) attack methodology — GATT enumeration, characteristic read/write without auth, pairing downgrade (Just Works forced), LE Secure Connections bypass, MITM via active relay, sniffing with Sniffle (TI CC1352) / Ubertooth / Frontline, encryption key extraction (LE Legacy Pairing crackable, LE Secure Connections strong), proximity authentication abuse (cars, locks), and companion-app trust analysis. Use for IoT BLE devices, smart locks, fitness trackers, medical devices, BLE beacons, or any device pairing over BLE.
- Aoffensive-bluetooth-classicBluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) attack methodology — device discovery, service enumeration via SDP, LMP/L2CAP layer attacks, legacy PIN cracking (BlueBorne / KNOB), Bluetooth file-transfer abuse (BlueSnarfing legacy), unauthenticated profile abuse (HSP, HFP, OPP), and modern relevance against older industrial / automotive / accessory targets. Use when in-scope devices use Bluetooth Classic (Bluetooth ≤ 4.0 BR/EDR) — common in legacy car kits, industrial sensors, older medical devices, and audio accessories.
- Aoffensive-bug-identification
- Aoffensive-business-logicBusiness logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.
- Aoffensive-c2-frameworksCommand and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across mTLS/WireGuard/DNS transport, operator multiplayer mode, armory extensions), Mythic (agent ecosystem with Apollo/Poseidon/Medusa, C2 profile configuration, translation containers), Havoc (Demon agent with sleep obfuscation via Ekko/Zilean, indirect syscalls, dotnet inline execution), Metasploit (msfvenom payload generation, multi/handler staging, Meterpreter post-exploitation modules), redirector architecture using Apache mod_rewrite and Nginx, domain fronting through CDN providers, DNS-based C2 for restrictive network egress, and TLS certificate management for infrastructure OPSEC. Tools: Cobalt Strike, Sliver, Mythic, Havoc, Metasploit Framework. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1071 (Application Layer Protocol), T1573 (Encrypted Channel), T1090 (Proxy/Connection Proxy).
- Doffensive-cicd-pipelineComprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and persistence via modified workflow definitions. Each technique section provides working exploitation code, detection indicators, and defensive countermeasures.