tdd skill
Test-driven development workflow with philosophy guide - plan → write tests → implement → validate
Is the tdd skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the tdd skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.git /tmp/Continuous-Claude-v3 mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Continuous-Claude-v3/.claude/skills/tdd ~/.claude/skills/tdd
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
/tdd - Test-Driven Development Workflow
Strict TDD workflow: tests first, then implementation.
When to Use
- "Implement X using TDD"
- "Build this feature test-first"
- "Write tests for X then implement"
- Any feature where test coverage is critical
- Bug fixes that need regression tests
TDD Philosophy
Overview
Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.
Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.
The Iron Law
NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRSTWrite code before the test? Delete it. Start over.
No exceptions:
- Don't keep it as "reference"
- Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
- Don't look at it
- Delete means delete
Implement fresh from tests. Period.
Red-Green-Refactor
RED - Write Failing Test
Write one minimal test showing what should happen.
Good:
test('retries failed operations 3 times', async () => {
let attempts = 0;
const operation = () => {
attempts++;
if (attempts < 3) throw new Error('fail');
return 'success';
};
const result = await retryOperation(operation);
expect(result).toBe('success');
expect(attempts).toBe(3);
});Clear name, tests real behavior, one thing.
Bad:
test('retry works', async () => {
const mock = jest.fn()
.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error())
.mockResolvedValueOnce('success');
await retryOperation(mock);
expect(mock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3);
});Vague name, tests mock not code.
Requirements:
- One behavior
- Clear name
- Real code (no mocks unless unavoidable)
Verify RED - Watch It Fail
MANDATORY. Never skip.
npm test path/to/test.test.ts
# or
pytest path/to/test_file.pyConfirm:
- Test fails (not errors)
- Failure message is expected
- Fails because feature missing (not typos)
Test passes? You're testing existing behavior. Fix test. Test errors? Fix error, re-run until it fails correctly.
GREEN - Minimal Code
Write simplest code to pass the test.
Good:
async function retryOperation<T>(fn: () => Promise<T>): Promise<T> {
for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
try {
return await fn();
} catch (e) {
if (i === 2) throw e;
}
}
throw new Error('unreachable');
}Just enough to pass.
Bad:
async function retryOperation<T>(
fn: () => Promise<T>,
options?: {
maxRetries?: number;
backoff?: 'linear' | 'exponential';
onRetry?: (attempt: number) => void;
}
): Promise<T> {
// YAGNI - over-engineered
}Don't add features, refactor other code, or "improve" beyond the test.
Verify GREEN - Watch It Pass
MANDATORY.
npm test path/to/test.test.tsConfirm:
- Test passes
- Other tests still pass
- Output pristine (no errors, warnings)
Test fails? Fix code, not test. Other tests fail? Fix now.
REFACTOR - Clean Up
After green only:
- Remove duplication
- Improve names
- Extract helpers
Keep tests green. Don't add behavior.
Common Rationalizations
Red Flags - STOP and Start Over
- Code before test
- Test after implementation
- Test passes immediately
- Can't explain why test failed
- Tests added "later"
- Rationalizing "just this once"
- "I already manually tested it"
- "Tests after achieve the same purpose"
- "Keep as reference" or "adapt existing code"
All of these mean: Delete code. Start over with TDD.
Verification Checklist
Before marking work complete:
- [ ] Every new function/method has a test
- [ ] Watched each test fail before implementing
- [ ] Each test failed for expected reason (feature missing, not typo)
- [ ] Wrote minimal code to pass each test
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] Output pristine (no errors, warnings)
- [ ] Tests use real code (mocks only if unavoidable)
- [ ] Edge cases and errors covered
Can't check all boxes? You skipped TDD. Start over.
When Stuck
Workflow Execution
More skills from parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3
- Aagent-context-isolationAgent Context Isolation
- Aagent-orchestrationAgent Orchestration Rules
- Aagentic-workflowAgentic Workflow Pattern
- Aagentica-claude-proxyGuide for integrating Agentica SDK with Claude Code CLI proxy
- Aagentica-infrastructureReference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs
- Aagentica-promptsWrite reliable prompts for Agentica/REPL agents that avoid LLM instruction ambiguity
- Aagentica-sdkBuild Python agents with Agentica SDK - @agentic decorator, spawn(), persistence, MCP integration
- Aagentica-serverAgentica server + Claude proxy setup - architecture, startup sequence, debugging
- Aagentica-spawnSpawn Agentica multi-agent patterns
- Aanalytic-functionsProblem-solving strategies for analytic functions in complex analysis
- Aast-grep-findAST-based code search and refactoring via ast-grep MCP
- Aasync-repl-protocolAsync REPL Protocol