Mmcp.market

explore skill

by parcadei·parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3·3.9k stars·MIT

Meta-skill for internal codebase exploration at varying depths (quick/deep/architecture)

A100/100content scan

Is the explore skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the explore skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.git /tmp/Continuous-Claude-v3
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/Continuous-Claude-v3/.claude/skills/explore ~/.claude/skills/explore
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Explore - Internal Codebase Exploration

Meta-skill for exploring an internal codebase at varying depths. READ-ONLY workflow - no code changes.

Usage

/explore <depth> [options]

Question Flow (No Arguments)

If the user types just /explore with no or partial arguments, guide them through this question flow. Use AskUserQuestion for each phase.

Phase 0: Workflow Selection

question: "How would you like to explore?"
header: "Explore"
options:
  - label: "Help me choose (Recommended)"
    description: "I'll ask questions to pick the right exploration depth"
  - label: "Quick - fast overview"
    description: "Chain: tldr tree → tldr structure (~1 min)"
  - label: "Deep - comprehensive analysis"
    description: "Chain: onboard → tldr → research → document (~5 min)"
  - label: "Architecture - layers & dependencies"
    description: "Chain: tldr arch → call graph → layer mapping (~3 min)"

Mapping:

  • "Help me choose" → Continue to Phase 1-4 questions
  • "Quick" → Set depth=quick, skip to Phase 2 (scope)
  • "Deep" → Set depth=deep, skip to Phase 2 (scope)
  • "Architecture" → Set depth=architecture, skip to Phase 2 (scope)

If Answer is Unclear (via "Other"):

question: "I want to understand how deep you want to explore. Did you mean..."
header: "Clarify"
options:
  - label: "Help me choose"
    description: "Not sure - guide me through questions"
  - label: "Quick - fast overview"
    description: "Just want to see what's here"
  - label: "Deep - comprehensive analysis"
    description: "Need thorough understanding"
  - label: "Neither - let me explain differently"
    description: "I'll describe what I need"

Phase 1: Exploration Goal

question: "What are you trying to understand?"
header: "Goal"
options:
  - label: "Get oriented in the codebase"
    description: "Quick overview of structure"
  - label: "Understand how something works"
    description: "Deep dive into specific area"
  - label: "Map the architecture"
    description: "Layers, dependencies, patterns"
  - label: "Find where something is"
    description: "Locate specific code/functionality"

Mapping:

  • "Get oriented" → quick depth
  • "Understand how" → deep depth
  • "Map architecture" → architecture depth
  • "Find where" → quick with --focus

Phase 2: Scope

question: "What area should I focus on?"
header: "Focus"
options:
  - label: "Entire codebase"
    description: "Explore everything"
  - label: "Specific directory or module"
    description: "I'll specify the path"
  - label: "Specific concept/feature"
    description: "e.g., 'authentication', 'API routes'"

If "Specific directory" or "Specific concept" → ask follow-up for the path/keyword.

Phase 3: Output Format

question: "What should I produce?"
header: "Output"
options:
  - label: "Just tell me what you find"
    description: "Interactive summary in chat"
  - label: "Create a documentation file"
    description: "Write to thoughts/shared/docs/"
  - label: "Create handoff for implementation"
    description: "Prepare context for coding agent"

Mapping:

  • "Documentation file" → --output doc
  • "Handoff for implementation" → --output handoff

Phase 4: Entry Point (Architecture only)

If architecture depth selected:

question: "Where should I start the analysis?"
header: "Entry point"
options:
  - label: "Auto-detect (main, cli, app)"
    description: "Find common entry points"
  - label: "Specific function/file"
    description: "I'll specify the entry point"

Summary Before Execution

Based on your answers, I'll run:

**Depth:** deep
**Focus:** "authentication"
**Output:** handoff
**Path:** src/

Proceed? [Yes / Adjust settings]

Depths

Options

Examples

# Quick structure overview
/explore quick

# Deep exploration focused on auth
/explore deep --focus "auth" --output doc

# Architecture analysis from specific entry
/explore architecture --entry "cli" --output handoff

# Quick focused exploration
/explore quick --focus "hooks"

Workflow Details

Quick Depth

Fast structure overview using tldr-explorer. Best for:

  • Initial orientation
  • Quick questions about structure
  • Finding where things are

Steps:

  1. Run tldr tree for file structure
  2. Run tldr structure for codemaps
  3. If --focus provided, run tldr search for targeted results
  4. Return summary

Commands:

# 1. File tree
tldr tree ${PATH:-src/} --ext .py

# 2. Code structure
tldr structure ${PATH:-src/} --lang python

# 3. Focused search (if --focus provided)
tldr search "${FOCUS}" ${PATH:-src/}

Deep Depth

Comprehensive exploration with documentation output. Best for:

  • First time in a codebase
  • Preparing for major work
  • Creating reference documentation

Steps:

  1. Check if onboarded (look for .claude/cache/tldr/), if not run onboard
  2. Run tldr-explorer for structure
  3. Spawn research-codebase agent for patterns
  4. Write findings to doc or handoff

Subprocess:

# 1. Onboard check
if [ ! -f .claude/cache/tldr/arch.json ]; then
    # Spawn onboard agent
fi

# 2. Structure analysis
tldr structure src/ --lang python
tldr calls src/

# 3. Research patterns (via scout agent)
Task: research-codebase → "Document existing patterns in ${FOCUS:-codebase}"

# 4. Write output
→ thoughts/shared/research/YYYY-MM-DD-explore-{focus}.md
→ OR thoughts/shared/handoffs/{session}/explore-{focus}.yaml

Architecture Depth

Architecture-focused analysis with layer detection. Best for:

  • Understanding system boundaries
  • Preparing for refactoring
  • Identifying coupling issues

Steps:

  1. Run tldr arch for layer detection
  2. Run tldr calls for cross-file call graph
  3. Analyze entry/middle/leaf layers
  4. Detect circular dependencies
  5. Map architectural boundaries

Commands:

# 1. Architecture detection
tldr arch ${PATH:-src/}
# Returns: entry_layer, middle_layer, leaf_layer, circular_deps

# 2. Call graph
tldr calls ${PATH:-src/}
# Returns: edges, nodes

# 3. Impact analysis from entry point (if --entry provided)
tldr impact ${ENTRY} ${PATH:-src/} --depth 3

Output Structure:

layers:
  entry: [routes.py, cli.py, main.py]  # Controllers/handlers
  middle: [services.py, auth.py]        # Business logic
  leaf: [utils.py, helpers.py]          # Utilities

call_graph:
  total_edges: 142
  hot_paths: [process_request → validate → authorize]

circular_deps:
  - [module_a, module_b]  # A imports B, B imports A

boundaries:
  - name: API layer
    files: [src/api/*]
    calls_to: [src/services/*]

Output Formats

--output doc

Creates: thoughts/shared/research/YYYY-MM-DD-explore-{focus}.md

---
date: {ISO timestamp}
type: exploration
depth: {quick|deep|architecture}
focus: {focus area or "full"}
commit: {git hash}
---

# Codebase Exploration: {focus}

## Summary
{High-level findings}

## Structure
{File tree / codemaps}

## Architecture
{Layer analysis - for architecture depth}

## Key Components
{Important files and their roles}

## Patterns Found
{Existing patterns - for deep depth}

## References
- `path/to/file.py:line` - Description

More skills from parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3

All agent skills → · MCP servers