explore skill
Meta-skill for internal codebase exploration at varying depths (quick/deep/architecture)
Is the explore skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 1 file in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the explore skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3.git /tmp/Continuous-Claude-v3 mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Continuous-Claude-v3/.claude/skills/explore ~/.claude/skills/explore
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Explore - Internal Codebase Exploration
Meta-skill for exploring an internal codebase at varying depths. READ-ONLY workflow - no code changes.
Usage
/explore <depth> [options]Question Flow (No Arguments)
If the user types just /explore with no or partial arguments, guide them through this question flow. Use AskUserQuestion for each phase.
Phase 0: Workflow Selection
question: "How would you like to explore?"
header: "Explore"
options:
- label: "Help me choose (Recommended)"
description: "I'll ask questions to pick the right exploration depth"
- label: "Quick - fast overview"
description: "Chain: tldr tree → tldr structure (~1 min)"
- label: "Deep - comprehensive analysis"
description: "Chain: onboard → tldr → research → document (~5 min)"
- label: "Architecture - layers & dependencies"
description: "Chain: tldr arch → call graph → layer mapping (~3 min)"Mapping:
- "Help me choose" → Continue to Phase 1-4 questions
- "Quick" → Set depth=quick, skip to Phase 2 (scope)
- "Deep" → Set depth=deep, skip to Phase 2 (scope)
- "Architecture" → Set depth=architecture, skip to Phase 2 (scope)
If Answer is Unclear (via "Other"):
question: "I want to understand how deep you want to explore. Did you mean..."
header: "Clarify"
options:
- label: "Help me choose"
description: "Not sure - guide me through questions"
- label: "Quick - fast overview"
description: "Just want to see what's here"
- label: "Deep - comprehensive analysis"
description: "Need thorough understanding"
- label: "Neither - let me explain differently"
description: "I'll describe what I need"Phase 1: Exploration Goal
question: "What are you trying to understand?"
header: "Goal"
options:
- label: "Get oriented in the codebase"
description: "Quick overview of structure"
- label: "Understand how something works"
description: "Deep dive into specific area"
- label: "Map the architecture"
description: "Layers, dependencies, patterns"
- label: "Find where something is"
description: "Locate specific code/functionality"Mapping:
- "Get oriented" → quick depth
- "Understand how" → deep depth
- "Map architecture" → architecture depth
- "Find where" → quick with --focus
Phase 2: Scope
question: "What area should I focus on?"
header: "Focus"
options:
- label: "Entire codebase"
description: "Explore everything"
- label: "Specific directory or module"
description: "I'll specify the path"
- label: "Specific concept/feature"
description: "e.g., 'authentication', 'API routes'"If "Specific directory" or "Specific concept" → ask follow-up for the path/keyword.
Phase 3: Output Format
question: "What should I produce?"
header: "Output"
options:
- label: "Just tell me what you find"
description: "Interactive summary in chat"
- label: "Create a documentation file"
description: "Write to thoughts/shared/docs/"
- label: "Create handoff for implementation"
description: "Prepare context for coding agent"Mapping:
- "Documentation file" → --output doc
- "Handoff for implementation" → --output handoff
Phase 4: Entry Point (Architecture only)
If architecture depth selected:
question: "Where should I start the analysis?"
header: "Entry point"
options:
- label: "Auto-detect (main, cli, app)"
description: "Find common entry points"
- label: "Specific function/file"
description: "I'll specify the entry point"Summary Before Execution
Based on your answers, I'll run:
**Depth:** deep
**Focus:** "authentication"
**Output:** handoff
**Path:** src/
Proceed? [Yes / Adjust settings]Depths
Options
Examples
# Quick structure overview
/explore quick
# Deep exploration focused on auth
/explore deep --focus "auth" --output doc
# Architecture analysis from specific entry
/explore architecture --entry "cli" --output handoff
# Quick focused exploration
/explore quick --focus "hooks"Workflow Details
Quick Depth
Fast structure overview using tldr-explorer. Best for:
- Initial orientation
- Quick questions about structure
- Finding where things are
Steps:
- Run tldr tree for file structure
- Run tldr structure for codemaps
- If --focus provided, run tldr search for targeted results
- Return summary
Commands:
# 1. File tree
tldr tree ${PATH:-src/} --ext .py
# 2. Code structure
tldr structure ${PATH:-src/} --lang python
# 3. Focused search (if --focus provided)
tldr search "${FOCUS}" ${PATH:-src/}Deep Depth
Comprehensive exploration with documentation output. Best for:
- First time in a codebase
- Preparing for major work
- Creating reference documentation
Steps:
- Check if onboarded (look for .claude/cache/tldr/), if not run onboard
- Run tldr-explorer for structure
- Spawn research-codebase agent for patterns
- Write findings to doc or handoff
Subprocess:
# 1. Onboard check
if [ ! -f .claude/cache/tldr/arch.json ]; then
# Spawn onboard agent
fi
# 2. Structure analysis
tldr structure src/ --lang python
tldr calls src/
# 3. Research patterns (via scout agent)
Task: research-codebase → "Document existing patterns in ${FOCUS:-codebase}"
# 4. Write output
→ thoughts/shared/research/YYYY-MM-DD-explore-{focus}.md
→ OR thoughts/shared/handoffs/{session}/explore-{focus}.yamlArchitecture Depth
Architecture-focused analysis with layer detection. Best for:
- Understanding system boundaries
- Preparing for refactoring
- Identifying coupling issues
Steps:
- Run tldr arch for layer detection
- Run tldr calls for cross-file call graph
- Analyze entry/middle/leaf layers
- Detect circular dependencies
- Map architectural boundaries
Commands:
# 1. Architecture detection
tldr arch ${PATH:-src/}
# Returns: entry_layer, middle_layer, leaf_layer, circular_deps
# 2. Call graph
tldr calls ${PATH:-src/}
# Returns: edges, nodes
# 3. Impact analysis from entry point (if --entry provided)
tldr impact ${ENTRY} ${PATH:-src/} --depth 3Output Structure:
layers:
entry: [routes.py, cli.py, main.py] # Controllers/handlers
middle: [services.py, auth.py] # Business logic
leaf: [utils.py, helpers.py] # Utilities
call_graph:
total_edges: 142
hot_paths: [process_request → validate → authorize]
circular_deps:
- [module_a, module_b] # A imports B, B imports A
boundaries:
- name: API layer
files: [src/api/*]
calls_to: [src/services/*]Output Formats
--output doc
Creates: thoughts/shared/research/YYYY-MM-DD-explore-{focus}.md
---
date: {ISO timestamp}
type: exploration
depth: {quick|deep|architecture}
focus: {focus area or "full"}
commit: {git hash}
---
# Codebase Exploration: {focus}
## Summary
{High-level findings}
## Structure
{File tree / codemaps}
## Architecture
{Layer analysis - for architecture depth}
## Key Components
{Important files and their roles}
## Patterns Found
{Existing patterns - for deep depth}
## References
- `path/to/file.py:line` - DescriptionMore skills from parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3
- Aagent-context-isolationAgent Context Isolation
- Aagent-orchestrationAgent Orchestration Rules
- Aagentic-workflowAgentic Workflow Pattern
- Aagentica-claude-proxyGuide for integrating Agentica SDK with Claude Code CLI proxy
- Aagentica-infrastructureReference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs
- Aagentica-promptsWrite reliable prompts for Agentica/REPL agents that avoid LLM instruction ambiguity
- Aagentica-sdkBuild Python agents with Agentica SDK - @agentic decorator, spawn(), persistence, MCP integration
- Aagentica-serverAgentica server + Claude proxy setup - architecture, startup sequence, debugging
- Aagentica-spawnSpawn Agentica multi-agent patterns
- Aanalytic-functionsProblem-solving strategies for analytic functions in complex analysis
- Aast-grep-findAST-based code search and refactoring via ast-grep MCP
- Aasync-repl-protocolAsync REPL Protocol