building-ransomware-playbook-with-cisa-framework skill
Builds a structured ransomware incident response playbook aligned with
Is the building-ransomware-playbook-with-cisa-framework skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 4 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the building-ransomware-playbook-with-cisa-framework skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/building-ransomware-playbook-with-cisa-framework ~/.claude/skills/building-ransomware-playbook-with-cisa-framework
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Building Ransomware Playbook with CISA Framework
When to Use
- An organization needs to create or update its ransomware incident response playbook following CISA guidelines
- A security team is conducting a ransomware readiness assessment against the CISA StopRansomware framework
- Compliance requires documenting ransomware response procedures aligned with NIST CSF and CISA recommendations
- During tabletop exercises to validate that the organization's ransomware response steps match industry best practices
- After a ransomware incident to update the playbook with lessons learned and close identified gaps
Do not use as a substitute for legal counsel regarding ransom payment decisions, breach notification timelines, or regulatory obligations specific to your jurisdiction.
Prerequisites
- Familiarity with the CISA StopRansomware Guide (cisa.gov/stopransomware/ransomware-guide)
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) understanding (Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover)
- Inventory of critical assets, backup infrastructure, and communication channels
- Defined roles and responsibilities for incident response team members
- Python 3.8+ for playbook generation and compliance checking automation
- Access to organization's asset inventory and backup configuration documentation
Workflow
Step 1: Preparation Phase (CISA Part 1 - Prevention)
Establish ransomware-specific defenses before an incident:
CISA Preparation Checklist:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
[ ] Maintain offline, encrypted backups tested for restoration
[ ] Create and exercise a cyber incident response plan (IRP)
[ ] Implement network segmentation between IT and OT networks
[ ] Enable MFA on all remote access and privileged accounts
[ ] Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) on all endpoints
[ ] Disable or restrict RDP; require VPN for remote access
[ ] Maintain a software/hardware asset inventory
[ ] Apply patches within 48 hours for internet-facing systems
[ ] Configure email filtering and disable macro execution by default
[ ] Conduct regular phishing awareness training
[ ] Implement application allowlisting (AppLocker/WDAC)
[ ] Test backup restoration quarterly and document RTO/RPOStep 2: Detection and Analysis Phase
Identify ransomware indicators and assess scope:
Detection Indicators:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
- Mass file rename operations with new extensions (.locked, .encrypted)
- Ransom notes appearing in directories (README.txt, DECRYPT.html)
- Volume Shadow Copy deletion (vssadmin delete shadows)
- Abnormal CPU usage from encryption processes
- EDR/AV alerts for known ransomware signatures
- Network connections to known C2 infrastructure
- Unusual lateral movement via SMB or PsExec
- Sysmon Event ID 11 (file creation) spikes
Initial Analysis Steps (CISA):
1. Take system images and memory captures of affected devices
2. Identify patient zero and initial access vector
3. Determine the ransomware family (ID Ransomware, ransom note analysis)
4. Assess encryption scope: which systems, shares, and data are affected
5. Check if data exfiltration occurred (double extortion indicator)Step 3: Containment Phase
Stop the spread and preserve evidence:
Immediate Containment (First 1-4 hours):
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Isolate affected systems from the network (disable NICs, VLAN quarantine)
2. If unable to disconnect, power down affected systems
3. Disable shared drives to prevent encryption spread
4. Reset credentials for compromised accounts (especially admin/service accounts)
5. Block known ransomware IOCs at firewall/proxy (C2 domains, IPs)
6. Preserve forensic evidence (memory dumps, disk images, logs)
7. Engage legal counsel and prepare breach notification if data exfiltrated
Extended Containment:
- Identify and patch the initial access vector (phishing, RDP, VPN vuln)
- Audit all Active Directory accounts for persistence (scheduled tasks, services)
- Check for backdoors or additional malware beyond the ransomware payloadStep 4: Eradication and Recovery Phase
Remove the threat and restore operations:
CISA Recovery Steps:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Rebuild affected systems from known-clean images (do NOT decrypt in place)
2. Restore data from offline backups (verify backup integrity first)
3. Reset ALL passwords including service accounts, krbtgt (twice, 12h apart)
4. Scan restored systems with updated AV/EDR before reconnecting to network
5. Re-enable services in priority order based on business criticality
6. Monitor restored systems intensively for 72 hours for reinfection
Recovery Priority Matrix:
P1 (0-4h): Domain controllers, DNS, authentication infrastructure
P2 (4-24h): Email, critical business applications, databases
P3 (1-3d): File servers, departmental applications
P4 (3-7d): Non-critical systems, development environmentsStep 5: Post-Incident Activity
Document lessons learned and improve defenses:
Post-Incident Report Template:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Executive summary: What happened, impact, resolution
2. Timeline: Detection to full recovery with timestamps
3. Root cause analysis: Initial access vector and propagation path
4. Scope: Number of systems, data volumes, business impact in hours/dollars
5. Response effectiveness: What worked, what failed, what was missing
6. Recommendations: Specific technical and procedural improvements
7. Compliance actions: Notification timeline, regulatory obligations met
8. Updated playbook: Revisions based on lessons learnedVerification
- Validate playbook completeness against CISA StopRansomware checklist items
- Conduct tabletop exercise using the playbook with all stakeholders
- Verify backup restoration procedures work within documented RTO targets
- Test communication plans including out-of-band channels
- Confirm legal and regulatory notification procedures are current
- Review and update the playbook at least annually or after any incident
Key Concepts
Tools & Systems
- CISA StopRansomware Guide: Primary framework for ransomware response planning and prevention
- NIST CSF: Cybersecurity Framework providing the Identify/Protect/Detect/Respond/Recover structure
- ID Ransomware: Service for identifying ransomware families from encrypted files and ransom notes
- MITRE ATT&CK: Technique framework for mapping ransomware TTPs to detection opportunities
- Velociraptor: Endpoint visibility tool for rapid triage and forensic artifact collection during incidents
More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
- Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
- Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
- Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
- Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
- Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
- Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
- Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
- Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
- Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
- Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
- Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.