building-incident-response-playbook skill
Designs and documents structured incident response playbooks with step-by-step
Is the building-incident-response-playbook skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 4 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the building-incident-response-playbook skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/building-incident-response-playbook ~/.claude/skills/building-incident-response-playbook
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Building Incident Response Playbooks
When to Use
- Establishing or maturing an incident response program from scratch
- Documenting procedures for a new incident type after a novel attack
- Automating response workflows in a SOAR platform (Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR)
- Preparing for compliance audits requiring documented IR procedures (SOC 2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA)
- Conducting a gap analysis of existing IR capabilities against specific threat scenarios
Do not use for one-time ad hoc investigations; playbooks are reusable procedure documents, not case-specific reports.
Prerequisites
- Organizational risk assessment identifying top incident scenarios by likelihood and impact
- NIST SP 800-61r3 or SANS PICERL framework adopted as the organizational IR standard
- Asset inventory with business criticality ratings and data classification
- RACI chart defining roles: Incident Commander, SOC analysts, system administrators, legal, communications
- Existing detection capabilities inventory (SIEM rules, EDR detections, IDS signatures)
- SOAR platform access if building automated playbooks
Workflow
Step 1: Select and Scope the Incident Type
Define the specific scenario the playbook will address:
- Identify the top incident types based on organizational risk assessment and historical data
- Scope each playbook to a single incident type for clarity (do not combine unrelated scenarios)
- Define trigger conditions that activate the playbook
Common playbook types:
Priority Playbooks (build first):
1. Ransomware incident response
2. Phishing/credential compromise
3. Business email compromise
4. Malware infection
5. Data breach/exfiltration
6. DDoS attack
7. Insider threat
8. Account takeover
9. Web application compromise
10. Cloud infrastructure compromiseStep 2: Define the Playbook Structure
Every playbook should follow a consistent structure:
PLAYBOOK TEMPLATE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Playbook Metadata
- Name, version, owner, last review date
- Trigger conditions
- Severity criteria
2. RACI Matrix
- Who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed for each step
3. Detection & Triage
- How the incident is detected
- Initial triage checklist
- Severity classification criteria
4. Containment
- Short-term containment actions
- Long-term containment actions
- Evidence preservation requirements
5. Eradication
- Root cause identification
- Malware/threat removal steps
- Verification procedures
6. Recovery
- System restoration steps
- Validation criteria
- Monitoring requirements post-recovery
7. Post-Incident
- Lessons learned meeting trigger
- Report template
- Detection improvement actions
8. Communication
- Internal notification matrix
- External notification requirements (regulators, customers, law enforcement)
- Status update cadence
9. Appendices
- Tool-specific procedures
- Contact lists
- Evidence collection checklistsStep 3: Write Decision Trees and Escalation Criteria
Define clear decision points with binary outcomes:
Detection Alert Received
├── Is the alert a true positive?
│ ├── YES → Classify severity
│ │ ├── P1 (Critical) → Page incident commander, begin containment immediately
│ │ ├── P2 (High) → Notify IR lead, begin investigation within 30 min
│ │ ├── P3 (Medium) → Queue for investigation within 4 hours
│ │ └── P4 (Low) → Document and investigate within 24 hours
│ └── NO → Document as false positive, tune detection rule
└── Cannot determine → Escalate to Tier 2 for deeper analysisEscalation triggers:
- Any P1 incident: Immediate escalation to IR lead and CISO
- Data exfiltration confirmed: Legal counsel and privacy officer notified
- Customer data involved: Customer notification process activated
- Third-party involvement: Vendor security contact engaged
- Law enforcement needed: General counsel authorizes before contact
Step 4: Define Specific Technical Procedures
Write tool-specific instructions for each step (not generic guidance):
CONTAINMENT - Endpoint Isolation via CrowdStrike:
1. Open Falcon Console > Hosts > Search for affected hostname
2. Click on the host > Host Details
3. Click "Contain Host" button in upper right
4. Confirm isolation (host will only communicate with CrowdStrike cloud)
5. Document containment action in incident ticket with timestamp
6. Verify containment: Host should show "Contained" status badge
CONTAINMENT - Block C2 Domain at DNS:
1. SSH to DNS server: ssh admin@dns-primary.corp.local
2. Add to block zone: echo "zone evil.com { type master; file /etc/bind/db.sinkhole; };" >> /etc/bind/named.conf.local
3. Reload DNS: rndc reload
4. Verify: dig @dns-primary evil.com (should resolve to sinkhole IP 10.0.0.99)
5. Document blocked domain in incident ticketStep 5: Integrate with SOAR Platform
Convert manual playbook steps into automated workflows:
- Map each playbook step to a SOAR action (API call, script, human decision point)
- Define automation boundaries (what runs automatically vs. what requires analyst approval)
- Build enrichment automations for the triage phase
- Create containment automations with approval gates for high-impact actions
- Configure notification automations for stakeholder communication
Step 6: Test and Maintain the Playbook
Validate the playbook through exercises and maintain currency:
- Conduct tabletop exercises with the IR team walking through the playbook
- Perform live-fire exercises simulating the incident type in a test environment
- Review and update after every real incident that uses the playbook
- Schedule quarterly reviews for accuracy of contact lists, tool procedures, and escalation paths
- Track playbook metrics: mean time to contain, mean time to resolve, false positive rate
Key Concepts
Tools & Systems
- Cortex XSOAR: SOAR platform with visual playbook editor, 700+ integrations, and collaborative War Room
- Splunk SOAR: SOAR platform integrated with Splunk ES, drag-and-drop playbook builder with 2,800+ automated actions
- TheHive: Open-source incident response platform with case templates that function as playbook frameworks
- Confluence / GitLab Wiki: Documentation platforms for maintaining human-readable playbook documents with version control
- Tines: No-code security automation platform for building playbook workflows without programming
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Building a Phishing Response Playbook from Scratch
Context: An organization with a 5-person SOC has no documented phishing response procedure. Analysts handle phishing reports inconsistently.
Approach:
- Interview SOC analysts to document their current ad hoc process
- Define the trigger: user reports phishing email via abuse@ mailbox or phishing button
- Write triage steps: extract email headers, check sender reputation, analyze URLs/attachments in sandbox
- Define containment: quarantine email from all mailboxes, block sender domain, reset passwords if credentials entered
- Build SOAR automation: auto-extract IOCs from reported email, enrich via VirusTotal, create case in TheHive
- Test with simulated phishing email and measure response time improvement
Pitfalls:
- Writing overly generic procedures that don't reference specific tool interfaces or commands
- Not including the communication plan for notifying users who received the phishing email
- Forgetting to define the criteria for when a phishing report becomes a full incident investigation
- Not versioning the playbook or scheduling regular review cycles
Output Format
INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAYBOOK
============================
Playbook Name: Phishing Incident Response
Version: 2.1
Owner: SOC Manager
Last Reviewed: 2025-11-01
Next Review: 2026-02-01
Trigger: Phishing email reported via abuse@corp.com or phish button
RACI MATRIX
Activity | SOC L1 | SOC L2 | IR Lead | Legal | Comms
Initial Triage | R | C | I | |
Email Analysis | R | A | I | |
Containment | | R | A | I |
Credential Reset | | R | A | |
User Notification | | C | A | | R
Regulatory Notification | | | C | R | A
Lessons Learned | C | C | R | I | I
PROCEDURE STEPS
[Detailed steps with tool-specific instructions]
DECISION TREE
[Flowchart logic]
ESCALATION MATRIX
[Conditions and contacts]
METRICS
Target MTTA: 15 minutes
Target MTTC: 1 hour
Target MTTR: 4 hoursMore skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
- Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
- Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
- Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
- Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
- Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
- Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
- Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
- Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
- Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
- Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
- Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.