building-devsecops-pipeline-with-gitlab-ci skill
Configure a GitLab CI/CD pipeline that embeds SAST (Semgrep, SpotBugs, Gosec, Bandit, NodeJsScan), DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, and secret detection via GitLab's managed security templates. Use when building a shift-left DevSecOps pipeline in GitLab, adding automated vulnerability scanning stages to .gitlab-ci.yml, or triaging scanner findings with GitLab Duo AI before deployment.
Is the building-devsecops-pipeline-with-gitlab-ci skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 8 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the building-devsecops-pipeline-with-gitlab-ci skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/building-devsecops-pipeline-with-gitlab-ci ~/.claude/skills/building-devsecops-pipeline-with-gitlab-ci
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Building DevSecOps Pipeline with GitLab CI
Overview
GitLab provides an integrated DevSecOps platform that embeds security testing directly into the CI/CD pipeline. By leveraging GitLab's built-in security scanners---SAST, DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, secret detection, and license compliance---teams can shift security left, catching vulnerabilities during development rather than post-deployment. GitLab Duo AI assists with false positive detection for SAST vulnerabilities, helping security teams focus on genuine issues.
When to Use
- When deploying or configuring building devsecops pipeline with gitlab ci capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
Prerequisites
- GitLab Ultimate license (required for full security scanner suite)
- GitLab Runner configured (shared or self-hosted)
- .gitlab-ci.yml pipeline configuration familiarity
- Docker-in-Docker (DinD) or Kaniko for container builds
- Application deployed to a staging environment for DAST scanning
Core Security Scanning Stages
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
SAST analyzes source code for vulnerabilities before compilation. GitLab supports 14+ languages using analyzers such as Semgrep, SpotBugs, Gosec, Bandit, and NodeJsScan. The simplest inclusion uses GitLab's managed templates.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
DAST tests running applications by simulating attack payloads against HTTP endpoints. It detects XSS, SQLi, CSRF, and other runtime vulnerabilities that static analysis cannot find. DAST requires a deployed, accessible target URL.
Container Scanning
Uses Trivy to scan Docker images for known CVEs in OS packages and application dependencies. Runs after the Docker build stage to gate images before they reach a registry.
Dependency Scanning
Inspects dependency manifests (package.json, requirements.txt, pom.xml, Gemfile.lock) for known vulnerable versions. Operates at the source code level, complementing container scanning.
Secret Detection
Scans commits for accidentally committed credentials, API keys, tokens, and private keys using pattern matching and entropy analysis. Runs on every commit to prevent secrets from reaching the repository.
Implementation
Complete Pipeline Configuration
# .gitlab-ci.yml
stages:
- build
- test
- security
- deploy-staging
- dast
- deploy-production
variables:
DOCKER_IMAGE: $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHORT_SHA
SECURE_LOG_LEVEL: "info"
# Include GitLab managed security templates
include:
- template: Security/SAST.gitlab-ci.yml
- template: Security/Secret-Detection.gitlab-ci.yml
- template: Security/Dependency-Scanning.gitlab-ci.yml
- template: Security/Container-Scanning.gitlab-ci.yml
- template: DAST.gitlab-ci.yml
- template: Security/License-Scanning.gitlab-ci.yml
build:
stage: build
image: docker:24.0
services:
- docker:24.0-dind
variables:
DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR: "/certs"
script:
- docker login -u $CI_REGISTRY_USER -p $CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD $CI_REGISTRY
- docker build -t $DOCKER_IMAGE .
- docker push $DOCKER_IMAGE
rules:
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH
unit-tests:
stage: test
image: $DOCKER_IMAGE
script:
- npm ci
- npm run test:coverage
coverage: '/Lines\s*:\s*(\d+\.?\d*)%/'
artifacts:
reports:
junit: junit-report.xml
coverage_report:
coverage_format: cobertura
path: coverage/cobertura-coverage.xml
# Override SAST to run iSecurity Approval Policies
Configure scan execution policies to enforce mandatory security scans:
- Navigate to Security & Compliance > Policies
- Create a "Scan Execution Policy" requiring SAST and secret detection on all branches
- Create a "Merge Request Approval Policy" requiring security team approval when critical vulnerabilities are detected
Custom SAST Ruleset Configuration
Create .gitlab/sast-ruleset.toml to customize analyzer behavior:
[semgrep]
[[semgrep.ruleset]]
dirs = ["src"]
[[semgrep.passthrough]]
type = "url"
target = "/sgrep-rules/custom-rules.yml"
value = "https://semgrep.dev/p/owasp-top-ten"
[[semgrep.passthrough]]
type = "url"
target = "/sgrep-rules/java-rules.yml"
value = "https://semgrep.dev/p/java"Security Dashboard and Vulnerability Management
Vulnerability Report
GitLab consolidates all scanner findings into a single Vulnerability Report accessible at Security & Compliance > Vulnerability Report. Each vulnerability includes:
- Severity rating (Critical, High, Medium, Low, Info)
- Scanner source (SAST, DAST, Container, Dependency, Secret)
- Location in source code or image layer
- Remediation guidance and suggested fixes
- Status tracking (Detected, Confirmed, Dismissed, Resolved)
Merge Request Security Widget
Every merge request displays a security scanning widget showing:
- New vulnerabilities introduced by the MR
- Fixed vulnerabilities resolved by the MR
- Comparison against the target branch baseline
Pipeline Optimization
- Parallel execution: Security scanners run concurrently in the security stage
- Caching: Use CI cache for dependency downloads to speed up scanning
- Incremental scanning: SAST can scan only changed files using SAST_INCREMENTAL: "true"
- Fail conditions: Set allow_failure: false on critical scanners to enforce quality gates
Monitoring and Metrics
References
- GitLab Security Scanning Documentation
- GitLab SAST Analyzers
- GitLab DAST Configuration
- GitLab Security Policies
- GitLab Vulnerability Management
More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
- Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
- Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
- Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
- Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
- Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
- Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
- Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
- Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
- Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
- Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
- Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.