Mmcp.market

building-attack-pattern-library-from-cti-reports skill

by mukul975·mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills·34k stars·Apache-2.0

Parse cyber threat intelligence reports (Mandiant, CrowdStrike, Talos, Microsoft) with stix2, mitreattack-python, and spaCy to extract adversary behaviors, map them to MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs, and build a searchable STIX 2.1 attack-pattern library with detection templates. Use when cataloging attack patterns from CTI reports for threat-informed detection engineering, or generating Sigma/YARA templates from documented behaviors.

A100/100content scan

Is the building-attack-pattern-library-from-cti-reports skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 4 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the building-attack-pattern-library-from-cti-reports skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/building-attack-pattern-library-from-cti-reports ~/.claude/skills/building-attack-pattern-library-from-cti-reports
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Building Attack Pattern Library from CTI Reports

Overview

Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports from vendors like Mandiant, CrowdStrike, Talos, and Microsoft contain detailed descriptions of adversary behaviors that can be extracted, normalized, and cataloged into a structured attack pattern library. This skill covers parsing CTI reports to extract adversary techniques, mapping behaviors to MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs, creating STIX 2.1 Attack Pattern objects, building a searchable library indexed by tactic, technique, and threat actor, and generating detection rule templates from documented patterns.

When to Use

  • When deploying or configuring building attack pattern library from cti reports capabilities in your environment
  • When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
  • When building or improving security architecture for this domain
  • When conducting security assessments that require this implementation

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.9+ with stix2, mitreattack-python, spacy, requests libraries
  • Collection of CTI reports (PDF, HTML, or text format)
  • MITRE ATT&CK STIX data (local or via TAXII)
  • Understanding of ATT&CK technique structure and naming conventions
  • Familiarity with detection engineering concepts (Sigma, YARA)

Key Concepts

Attack Pattern Extraction

CTI reports describe adversary behaviors in natural language. Extraction involves identifying action verbs and technical terms that map to ATT&CK techniques, recognizing tool names and malware families, identifying infrastructure indicators, and mapping sequences of behaviors to attack chains (kill chain phases).

STIX 2.1 Attack Pattern Objects

STIX defines Attack Pattern as a Structured Domain Object (SDO) that describes ways threat actors attempt to compromise targets. Each pattern links to ATT&CK via external references, includes kill chain phases (tactics), and can be related to Intrusion Sets, Malware, and Tool objects.

Detection Rule Generation

Extracted attack patterns inform detection engineering by providing: specific procedure examples for Sigma rule creation, behavioral sequences for correlation rules, IOC patterns for YARA and Snort rules, and data source requirements for telemetry gaps.

Workflow

Step 1: Parse CTI Reports and Extract Behaviors

import re
import json
from collections import defaultdict

class CTIReportParser:
    """Parse CTI reports to extract adversary behaviors."""

    BEHAVIOR_INDICATORS = [
        "used", "executed", "deployed", "leveraged", "exploited",
        "established", "created", "modified", "downloaded", "uploaded",
        "exfiltrated", "injected", "enumerated", "spawned", "dropped",
        "persisted", "escalated", "moved laterally", "collected",
        "encrypted", "compressed", "encoded", "obfuscated",
    ]

    TOOL_PATTERNS = [
        r'\b(Cobalt Strike|Mimikatz|PsExec|BloodHound|Rubeus|Impacket)\b',
        r'\b(PowerShell|cmd\.exe|WMI|WMIC|certutil|bitsadmin)\b',
        r'\b(Metasploit|Empire|Covenant|Sliver|Brute Ratel)\b',
        r'\b(Lazagne|SharpHound|ADFind|Sharphound|Invoke-Obfuscation)\b',
    ]

    TECHNIQUE_KEYWORDS = {
        "spearphishing": "T1566",
        "phishing attachment": "T1566.001",
        "phishing link": "T1566.002",
        "powershell": "T1059.001",
        "command line": "T1059.003",
        "scheduled task": "T1053.005",
        "registry run key": "T1547.001",
        "process injection": "T1055",
        "dll side-loading": "T1574.002",
     

Step 2: Map Behaviors to ATT&CK Techniques

from attackcti import attack_client

class ATTACKMapper:
    def __init__(self):
        self.lift = attack_client()
        self.techniques = {}
        self._load_techniques()

    def _load_techniques(self):
        """Load all ATT&CK techniques for mapping."""
        all_techs = self.lift.get_enterprise_techniques()
        for tech in all_techs:
            tech_id = ""
            for ref in tech.get("external_references", []):
                if ref.get("source_name") == "mitre-attack":
                    tech_id = ref.get("external_id", "")
                    break
            if tech_id:
                self.techniques[tech_id] = {
                    "name": tech.get("name", ""),
                    "description": tech.get("description", "")[:500],
                    "tactics": [p.get("phase_name") for p in tech.get("kill_chain_phases", [])],
                    "platforms": tech.get("x_mitre_platforms", []),
                    "data_sources": tech.get("x_mitre_data_sources", []),
                }
        print(f"[+] Loaded {len(self.techniques)} ATT&CK techniques")

    def map_behaviors(self, behaviors):
        """Map extracted behaviors to ATT&CK techniques."""

Step 3: Create STIX 2.1 Attack Pattern Library

from stix2 import AttackPattern, Relationship, Bundle, TLP_GREEN
from datetime import datetime

class AttackPatternLibrary:
    def __init__(self):
        self.patterns = []
        self.relationships = []

    def add_pattern_from_mapping(self, mapping, report_source="CTI Report"):
        """Create STIX Attack Pattern from mapped behavior."""
        pattern = AttackPattern(
            name=mapping["technique_name"],
            description=f"Observed: {mapping['source_sentence']}\n\n"
                        f"Tools: {', '.join(mapping['tools_observed']) or 'None identified'}\n"
                        f"Source: {report_source}",
            external_references=[{
                "source_name": "mitre-attack",
                "external_id": mapping["technique_id"],
                "url": f"https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/{mapping['technique_id'].replace('.', '/')}/",
            }],
            kill_chain_phases=[{
                "kill_chain_name": "mitre-attack",
                "phase_name": tactic,
            } for tactic in mapping["tactics"]],
            object_marking_refs=[TLP_GREEN],
        )
        self.patterns.append(pattern)
        return pattern

    def

Validation Criteria

  • CTI report parsed and behavioral indicators extracted
  • Behaviors mapped to ATT&CK techniques with confidence
  • STIX 2.1 Attack Pattern objects created with proper references
  • Library searchable by tactic, technique, and threat actor
  • Detection templates generated from documented patterns
  • Library exportable as STIX bundle for sharing

References

  • MITRE ATT&CK
  • STIX 2.1 Attack Pattern SDO
  • CISA: Best Practices for ATT&CK Mapping
  • attackcti Python Library
  • Sigma Rules Project
  • MITRE ATT&CK STIX Data

More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

  • Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
  • Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
  • Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
  • Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
  • Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
  • Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
  • Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
  • Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
  • Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
  • Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
  • Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
  • Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

All agent skills → · MCP servers