Mmcp.market

benchmarking-kubernetes-with-kube-bench skill

by mukul975·mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills·34k stars·Apache-2.0

Installs and runs the kube-bench tool against a Kubernetes cluster as a Job, DaemonSet, or standalone binary, selecting the correct benchmark version and targets (control plane, etcd, kubelet, worker nodes) and emitting JSON or JUnit output for pipelines. Use when setting kube-bench up for the first time, choosing which benchmark version and node targets to run, wiring it into CI, or troubleshooting skipped or misdetected checks. Keywords: kube-bench, DaemonSet, --benchmark, --targets, JSON output, JUnit, CI integration. Do not use for interpreting the findings or producing an audit report - use performing-kubernetes-cis-benchmark-with-kube-bench.

A100/100content scan

Is the benchmarking-kubernetes-with-kube-bench skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 5 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the benchmarking-kubernetes-with-kube-bench skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/benchmarking-kubernetes-with-kube-bench ~/.claude/skills/benchmarking-kubernetes-with-kube-bench
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Benchmarking Kubernetes with kube-bench

Overview

kube-bench (by Aqua Security) is an open-source tool that checks whether a Kubernetes cluster is deployed securely by running the checks documented in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark. It inspects the control-plane components (API server, controller manager, scheduler, etcd), the kubelet and worker-node configuration, and cluster-wide policy settings, then reports each check as PASS, FAIL, WARN, or INFO with a remediation recommendation drawn directly from the CIS guidance. Tests are configuration-driven YAML files, so kube-bench tracks new Kubernetes versions and benchmark revisions and supports managed distributions (EKS, GKE, AKS, ACK, OpenShift, RKE, k3s).

Hardening a cluster against the CIS Benchmark directly reduces the attack surface for T1610 (Deploy Container), where an adversary deploys a container to execute code or evade defenses — for example by abusing privileged containers, host namespaces, anonymous API access, or insecure kubelet settings that an unhardened cluster leaves exposed.

kube-bench can run as a standalone binary on a node, inside a container, or — most commonly — as a Kubernetes Job whose pod has the host filesystem mounted so it can read the relevant config files. Output is available as human-readable text, JSON, JUnit, or AWS Security Finding Format (ASFF) and can be pushed to a PostgreSQL database for trend tracking.

When to Use

  • When establishing a security baseline for a new Kubernetes cluster against the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
  • When performing periodic compliance audits of control-plane and node hardening.
  • When validating remediation after applying hardening changes (re-run to confirm checks now PASS).
  • When integrating cluster compliance scanning into CI/CD or a continuous monitoring pipeline.
  • When preparing evidence for SOC 2, PCI DSS, or internal hardening compliance.

Prerequisites

  • Access to the cluster: either SSH access to a control-plane/worker node (binary mode) or kubectl with permission to create Jobs (in-cluster mode).
  • Knowledge of the cluster's Kubernetes version (kube-bench auto-detects, or specify with --version / --benchmark).
  • Install kube-bench (Aqua Security official methods):
# Binary release (Linux)
KB_VERSION=0.10.7
curl -L -o kube-bench.tgz \
  "https://github.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/releases/download/v${KB_VERSION}/kube-bench_${KB_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz"
tar -xzf kube-bench.tgz
sudo mv kube-bench /usr/local/bin/
sudo cp -R cfg /etc/kube-bench/cfg

# Via Go install
go install github.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench@latest

# Run as a one-off container directly on a node (mounts host config)
docker run --rm --pid=host \
  -v /etc:/etc:ro -v /var:/var:ro \
  -t docker.io/aquasec/kube-bench:latest run --targets node

# Verify
kube-bench version

Objectives

  • Run kube-bench against the appropriate benchmark for the cluster's Kubernetes version.
  • Scan control-plane (master), node, etcd, control-plane policies, and managed-service targets.
  • Produce machine-readable JSON/JUnit output for pipelines and dashboards.
  • Triage FAIL and WARN results and apply CIS remediation guidance.
  • Re-run to validate that remediations now PASS.

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Workflow

1. Run the default scan (auto-detect)

Run all applicable targets, letting kube-bench detect the Kubernetes version and benchmark:

sudo kube-bench

2. Run as a Kubernetes Job (in-cluster)

Apply the provided Job manifest from the kube-bench repo and read the results from the pod logs:

# General-purpose job
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/main/job.yaml

# Wait, then retrieve results
kubectl get pods -l app=kube-bench
kubectl logs -l app=kube-bench

# Platform-specific jobs are available, e.g. EKS:
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/main/job-eks.yaml

3. Target specific components

Use run --targets to scope the scan to particular component groups:

# Control-plane (API server, scheduler, controller manager)
sudo kube-bench run --targets master

# Worker node (kubelet, proxy)
sudo kube-bench run --targets node

# etcd datastore
sudo kube-bench run --targets etcd

# Cluster-wide policies (RBAC, pod security, network policy)
sudo kube-bench run --targets policies

# Combine multiple targets
sudo kube-bench run --targets master,node,etcd,policies

4. Pin a specific benchmark or Kubernetes version

When auto-detection is wrong or you must audit against a specific revision, pin the benchmark explicitly:

# Pin to a specific CIS benchmark revision
sudo kube-bench run --benchmark cis-1.8

# Or map by Kubernetes version
sudo kube-bench --version 1.27

# Managed/distribution-specific benchmarks
sudo kube-bench run --benchmark eks-1.5.0
sudo kube-bench run --benchmark gke-1.6.0
sudo kube-bench run --benchmark rke2-cis-1.7

5. Run or skip individual checks

Focus on or exclude specific check IDs during remediation cycles:

# Run only specific checks
sudo kube-bench run --targets master --check 1.2.1,1.2.2

# Skip noisy/known-accepted checks
sudo kube-bench run --targets node --skip 4.2.6

6. Produce machine-readable output

Emit JSON or JUnit for ingestion into pipelines, SIEM, or dashboards, and write to a file:

# JSON to a file
sudo kube-bench run --targets master,node --json --outputfile kube-bench-report.json

# JUnit (for CI test reporting)
sudo kube-bench --junit --outputfile kube-bench-junit.xml

# AWS Security Finding Format (for Security Hub)
sudo kube-bench run --targets node --asff

7. Triage and remediate FAIL/WARN findings

Each failing check prints a remediation. Apply the CIS-recommended fix on the node/manifest, for example tightening API server flags in the static pod manifest:

# Example remediation for a common control-plane FAIL:
# CIS 1.2.x — ensure anonymous-auth is disabled on the API server.
# Edit the static pod manifest and set the flag:
sudo vi /etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-apiserver.yaml
#   - --anonymous-auth=false
# The kubelet restarts the static pod automatically.

# Example node remediation — kubelet config file permissions (CIS 4.1.x):
sudo chmod 600 /etc/kubernetes/kubelet/kubelet-config.json
sudo chown root:root /etc/kubernetes/kubelet/kubelet-config.json

8. Re-validate after remediation

Re-run the relevant target and confirm the previously failing checks now PASS, then track the score over time:

sudo kube-bench run --targets master --check 1.2.1 --json --outputfile recheck.json

# Optional: persist results to PostgreSQL for trend tracking
sudo kube-bench run --targets master,node --pgsql

Tools and Resources

Validation Criteria

  • [ ] kube-bench installed (kube-bench version) or running as a Job.
  • [ ] Scan run against the correct benchmark for the cluster's Kubernetes version.
  • [ ] master, node, etcd, and policies targets each scanned.
  • [ ] JSON/JUnit output produced for pipeline/dashboard ingestion.
  • [ ] FAIL and WARN findings triaged and prioritized.
  • [ ] CIS remediation applied to control-plane manifests and node configs.
  • [ ] Re-run confirms previously failing checks now PASS.
  • [ ] Results tracked over time (file archive or PostgreSQL).

More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

  • Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
  • Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
  • Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
  • Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
  • Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
  • Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
  • Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
  • Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
  • Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
  • Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
  • Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
  • Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

All agent skills → · MCP servers