auditing-uefi-firmware-with-chipsec skill
Use Intel CHIPSEC to assess platform firmware configuration, SPI flash write protection, BIOS lock, SMM/SMRR, and Secure Boot variable state, dump SPI flash, and triage UEFI variables for firmware-level threats.
Is the auditing-uefi-firmware-with-chipsec skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 5 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the auditing-uefi-firmware-with-chipsec skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/auditing-uefi-firmware-with-chipsec ~/.claude/skills/auditing-uefi-firmware-with-chipsec
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Auditing UEFI Firmware with CHIPSEC
Authorized Use Only: CHIPSEC loads a kernel driver and reads/writes low-level hardware registers, SPI flash, and SMM. Run it only on systems you own or are explicitly authorized to assess, ideally on dedicated test hardware. Misuse (especially write/modify modules) can brick a machine. Never run write-capable modules on production systems.
Overview
CHIPSEC is the open-source Platform Security Assessment Framework created by Intel's Advanced Threat Research team. It inspects the low-level security configuration of x86 platform firmware and hardware — the layer below the operating system where bootkits and firmware implants live. CHIPSEC loads a signed kernel driver (Linux, Windows, or it can run from the UEFI shell) to read and write hardware registers, Model-Specific Registers (MSRs), PCI config space, SPI flash, and UEFI variables, then runs an automated test suite that checks whether the platform's defensive locks are actually engaged.
The threat CHIPSEC addresses is MITRE ATT&CK T1542.001 — Pre-OS Boot: System Firmware: adversaries who modify system firmware (the BIOS/UEFI image on SPI flash) to gain stealthy, persistent, OS-survivable control. Firmware implants persist across OS reinstall and disk replacement and are invisible to most EDR. CHIPSEC's value is verifying the prerequisites that prevent such implants: that the SPI flash BIOS region is write-protected (BIOSCNTL BLE/SMMBWP, SPI Protected Ranges), that the flash descriptor locks region access, that SMRAM/SMRR are configured, and that Secure Boot variables are protected. It also dumps the SPI flash for offline forensic comparison.
Sources: Intel/CHIPSEC project (https://github.com/chipsec/chipsec), CHIPSEC documentation (https://chipsec.github.io/).
When to Use
- Baseline firmware-security assessment of a new laptop/server platform or fleet image
- Verifying that BIOS write protection and SPI flash locks are correctly enabled by the OEM
- Firmware forensics: dumping SPI flash to compare against a known-good image
- Validating Secure Boot variable protection and S3 boot-script protection
- Hunting for evidence of a firmware implant or misconfiguration enabling one
Prerequisites
- Physical or admin/root access to the target x86 platform (Intel or AMD)
- Linux (root) or Windows (Administrator), or a UEFI shell environment
- Ability to load a kernel driver (Secure Boot may need to allow the CHIPSEC driver, or use --no_driver for limited checks)
- Python 3.8+ and a C compiler/build tools for the kernel module on Linux
- Dedicated test hardware strongly recommended
Install CHIPSEC:
# From PyPI
pip install chipsec
# Or from source (builds the kernel helper/driver)
git clone https://github.com/chipsec/chipsec
cd chipsec
python setup.py install # builds and installs, including the Linux driver
# Verify
sudo chipsec_main --help
sudo chipsec_util --helpObjectives
- Run the full automated platform-security test suite and interpret PASS/FAIL/WARNING
- Verify BIOS write protection (BIOS_CNTL) and SPI Protected Ranges
- Verify the SPI flash descriptor locks region read/write access
- Verify SMRAM/SMRR and SMI handler protections
- Verify Secure Boot variable protection and S3 boot-script protection
- Dump SPI flash and decode it for offline analysis
- Enumerate UEFI variables and detect anomalous/unexpected entries
MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
CHIPSEC defends against T1542.001 by verifying that the controls preventing unauthorized firmware modification are enabled. A FAIL on common.bioswp (BIOS not write-protected) or chipsec.modules.common.spilock (flash descriptor unlocked) means an attacker with OS privileges could rewrite the SPI flash and implant persistent firmware — exactly the precondition for this technique.
Workflow
Step 1: Run the full automated test suite
chipsec_main with no module argument runs every applicable security check for the detected platform and prints a summary of PASS/FAIL/WARNING/INFORMATION results.
sudo chipsec_main
# Save machine-readable output for reporting / diffing
sudo chipsec_main -j results.json -x results.xml -l chipsec.logStep 2: Run the core firmware-protection modules individually
The common module group contains the OEM-independent security checks. Run the group or specific modules:
# Run the whole common group
sudo chipsec_main -m common
# BIOS write protection: checks BIOS_CNTL BLE/SMM_BWP and SPI protected ranges
sudo chipsec_main -m common.bios_wp
# SPI flash descriptor lock (FLOCKDN) — are flash region accesses locked?
sudo chipsec_main -m common.spi_lock
# SMRR programming — protects SMRAM from cache-based attacks
sudo chipsec_main -m common.smrr
# SMM BIOS write protection
sudo chipsec_main -m common.smm
# S3 resume boot-script protection (against bootscript table attacks)
sudo chipsec_main -m common.uefi.s3bootscriptStep 3: Verify Secure Boot variable protection
# Checks that Secure Boot UEFI variables are properly protected
sudo chipsec_main -m common.secureboot.variables
# To actively test write protection of the variables (test hardware ONLY):
sudo chipsec_main -m common.secureboot.variables -a modifyStep 4: Inspect SPI flash region access permissions
# Report SPI flash regions, descriptor, and access permissions
sudo chipsec_util spi info
# Check the SPI access-control module
sudo chipsec_main -m common.spi_accessStep 5: Dump SPI flash for offline forensics
Dumping the flash lets you decode the firmware volumes and compare against a known-good OEM image.
# Dump the entire SPI flash to a file
sudo chipsec_util spi dump rom.bin
# Decode the dumped image: extracts firmware volumes, files, NVRAM variables, etc.
sudo chipsec_util decode rom.binStep 6: Enumerate and triage UEFI variables
# List all UEFI variables from the runtime interface
sudo chipsec_util uefi var-list
# List variables directly from the SPI image (offline)
sudo chipsec_util uefi var-find PK
sudo chipsec_util uefi var-read db <GUID> db.bin
# Decode the UEFI firmware structure
sudo chipsec_util uefi decode rom.binStep 7: Limited assessment without a kernel driver
Where loading the driver is impossible (locked-down Secure Boot), some checks still run read-only.
sudo chipsec_main -n # --no_driver: skip checks that need the driver
sudo chipsec_main -p <PLATFORM> # force platform code if auto-detect failsStep 8: Triage results and report
- FAIL on bioswp / spilock → firmware is rewritable from the OS: high risk for T1542.001.
- FAIL on secureboot.variables → Secure Boot policy can be tampered.
- Compare the spi dump against the OEM's known-good image (hash firmware volumes) to detect unauthorized modification.
- Record platform, BIOS version, and every FAIL/WARNING with the relevant register values for the report.
Tools and Resources
Core Module Reference
Validation Criteria
- [ ] CHIPSEC installed and driver loads (or -n documented if not)
- [ ] Full chipsec_main suite executed with JSON/XML/log output saved
- [ ] common.bios_wp result interpreted (write protection state)
- [ ] common.spilock / spiaccess result interpreted (descriptor lock)
- [ ] SMRR/SMM module results recorded
- [ ] Secure Boot variable protection checked
- [ ] SPI flash dumped and decoded for offline analysis
- [ ] UEFI variables enumerated and triaged
- [ ] All FAIL/WARNING findings documented with platform/BIOS version
- [ ] Write/modify modules NOT run on production hardware
More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
- Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
- Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
- Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
- Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
- Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
- Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
- Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
- Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
- Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
- Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
- Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.