Mmcp.market

analyzing-windows-prefetch-with-python skill

by mukul975·mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills·34k stars·Apache-2.0

Parse Windows Prefetch (.pf) files with the windowsprefetch Python

A100/100content scan

Is the analyzing-windows-prefetch-with-python skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 4 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the analyzing-windows-prefetch-with-python skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description. 

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/analyzing-windows-prefetch-with-python ~/.claude/skills/analyzing-windows-prefetch-with-python
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Analyzing Windows Prefetch with Python

Overview

Windows Prefetch files (.pf) record application execution data including executable names, run counts, timestamps, loaded DLLs, and accessed directories. This skill covers parsing Prefetch files using the windowsprefetch Python library to reconstruct execution timelines, detect renamed or masquerading binaries by comparing executable names with loaded resources, and identifying suspicious programs that may indicate malware execution or lateral movement.

When to Use

  • When investigating security incidents that require analyzing windows prefetch with python
  • When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
  • When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
  • When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.9+ with windowsprefetch library (pip install windowsprefetch)
  • Windows Prefetch files from C:\Windows\Prefetch\ (versions 17-30 supported)
  • Understanding of Windows Prefetch file naming conventions (EXECUTABLE-HASH.pf)

Steps

Step 1: Collect Prefetch Files

Gather .pf files from target system's C:\Windows\Prefetch\ directory.

Step 2: Parse Execution History

Extract executable name, run count, last execution timestamps, and volume information.

Step 3: Detect Suspicious Execution

Flag known attack tools (mimikatz, psexec, etc.), renamed binaries, and unusual execution patterns.

Step 4: Build Execution Timeline

Reconstruct chronological execution timeline from all Prefetch files.

Expected Output

JSON report with execution history, suspicious executables, renamed binary indicators, and timeline reconstruction.

Example Output

$ python3 prefetch_analyzer.py --dir /evidence/Windows/Prefetch --output /analysis/prefetch_report

Windows Prefetch Analyzer v2.1
================================
Source: /evidence/Windows/Prefetch/
Prefetch Format: Windows 10 (MAM compressed, version 30)
Files Found: 234

--- Execution Timeline (Incident Window: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-18) ---
Last Executed (UTC)     | Run Count | Filename                    | Hash     | Path
------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------
2024-01-15 14:33:15     | 1         | Q4_REPORT.XLSM-2A1B3C4D.pf | 2A1B3C4D | C:\Users\jsmith\Downloads\Q4_Report.xlsm
2024-01-15 14:35:44     | 1         | POWERSHELL.EXE-A2B3C4D5.pf  | A2B3C4D5 | C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe
2024-01-15 14:36:30     | 3         | UPDATE_CLIENT.EXE-B3C4D5E6.pf| B3C4D5E6| C:\ProgramData\Updates\update_client.exe
2024-01-15 15:10:22     | 1         | NETSCAN.EXE-C4D5E6F7.pf     | C4D5E6F7 | C:\Users\jsmith\Downloads\netscan.exe
2024-01-16 02:28:00     | 1         | PROCDUMP64.EXE-D5E6F7A8.pf  | D5E6F7A8 | C:\Windows\Temp\procdump64.exe
2024-01-16 02:30:15     | 2         | MIMIKATZ

More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

  • Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
  • Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
  • Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
  • Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
  • Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
  • Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
  • Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
  • Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
  • Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
  • Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
  • Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
  • Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

All agent skills → · MCP servers