analyzing-windows-amcache-artifacts skill
'Parses the Windows Amcache.hve registry hive with Eric Zimmerman''s
Is the analyzing-windows-amcache-artifacts skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 4 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the analyzing-windows-amcache-artifacts skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/analyzing-windows-amcache-artifacts ~/.claude/skills/analyzing-windows-amcache-artifacts
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Analyzing Windows Amcache Artifacts
When to Use
- Determining which programs have existed or executed on a Windows system during incident response
- Correlating SHA-1 hashes from Amcache against known malware databases (VirusTotal, CIRCL, MISP)
- Building an application installation and execution timeline for forensic investigations
- Identifying deleted executables that leave traces in Amcache even after file removal
- Investigating insider threats by documenting which portable or unauthorized applications were present
- Analyzing driver loading history to detect rootkits or malicious kernel modules
Do not use as sole proof of program execution. Amcache proves file existence and metadata registration, but ShimCache (AppCompatCache) and Prefetch provide stronger execution evidence. Use all three artifacts together for conclusive analysis.
Prerequisites
- A forensic image or live triage copy of C:\Windows\appcompat\Programs\Amcache.hve (and associated .LOG1, .LOG2 transaction logs)
- Eric Zimmerman's AmcacheParser (AmcacheParser.exe) downloaded from https://ericzimmerman.github.io/
- Eric Zimmerman's Timeline Explorer for viewing parsed CSV output
- Optionally: Registry Explorer for manual hive inspection
- A SHA-1 whitelist of known-good executables (e.g., NSRL hashset) for filtering
- .NET 6+ runtime installed (required by current EZ tools)
- Write access to an output directory for CSV results
Workflow
Step 1: Acquire the Amcache.hve File
Extract the Amcache hive from a forensic image or live system:
# From a live system (requires elevated privileges and raw copy tool)
# Amcache.hve is locked by the system; use a raw disk copy tool
# Option A: FTK Imager - mount image and navigate to:
# C:\Windows\appcompat\Programs\Amcache.hve
# Also collect: Amcache.hve.LOG1, Amcache.hve.LOG2
# Option B: Using KAPE for automated triage collection
kape.exe --tsource C: --tdest D:\Evidence\%m --target Amcache
# Option C: From a mounted forensic image (E: = mounted image)
copy "E:\Windows\appcompat\Programs\Amcache.hve" D:\Evidence\
copy "E:\Windows\appcompat\Programs\Amcache.hve.LOG1" D:\Evidence\
copy "E:\Windows\appcompat\Programs\Amcache.hve.LOG2" D:\Evidence\Always collect the transaction log files (.LOG1, .LOG2) alongside the hive. AmcacheParser replays uncommitted transactions from these logs to recover the most complete data.
Step 2: Parse Amcache with AmcacheParser
Run AmcacheParser against the acquired hive:
# Basic parsing with CSV output
AmcacheParser.exe -f "D:\Evidence\Amcache.hve" --csv "D:\Evidence\Output"
# Parse with a SHA-1 whitelist to exclude known-good entries (NSRL)
AmcacheParser.exe -f "D:\Evidence\Amcache.hve" -w "D:\Whitelists\nsrl_sha1.txt" --csv "D:\Evidence\Output"
# Parse with a SHA-1 inclusion list (only show matches against known-bad hashes)
AmcacheParser.exe -f "D:\Evidence\Amcache.hve" -b "D:\IOCs\malware_sha1.txt" --csv "D:\Evidence\Output"
# Include deleted entries with high-precision timestamps
AmcacheParser.exe -f "D:\Evidence\Amcache.hve" --csv "D:\Evidence\Output" -i --mpAmcacheParser produces multiple CSV files in the output directory:
Step 3: Analyze File Entries for Suspicious Programs
Open the AssociatedFileEntries.csv in Timeline Explorer and examine key columns:
Key columns to review:
- ProgramId : Links file to its parent program entry
- SHA1 : Hash for threat intel lookups
- FullPath : Original file location on disk
- FileSize : Size of the executable
- FileKeyLastWriteTimestamp : When the Amcache entry was last updated
- Name : File name
- Publisher : Code signing publisher (blank = unsigned)
- BinProductVersion : Version string from the PE header
- LinkDate : PE compilation timestamp (useful for detecting timestomping)Filter for suspicious indicators:
# In Timeline Explorer, apply these filters:
# 1. Find unsigned executables (potentially malicious)
Publisher column = (empty)
# 2. Find executables from suspicious paths
FullPath contains: \temp\, \appdata\, \downloads\, \public\, \programdata\
# 3. Find executables with recent timestamps during incident window
FileKeyLastWriteTimestamp between: 2026-03-15 00:00:00 and 2026-03-16 00:00:00
# 4. Find executables with suspicious compilation dates (timestomping)
LinkDate year < 2015 AND FileKeyLastWriteTimestamp year = 2026Step 4: Correlate SHA-1 Hashes with Threat Intelligence
Extract SHA-1 hashes and check against malware databases:
# Extract unique SHA-1 hashes from the parsed output
# Using PowerShell to extract the SHA1 column
Import-Csv "D:\Evidence\Output\Amcache_AssociatedFileEntries.csv" |
Select-Object -ExpandProperty SHA1 -Unique |
Where-Object { $_ -ne "" } |
Out-File "D:\Evidence\Output\extracted_hashes.txt"
# Check hashes against VirusTotal using vt-cli
foreach ($hash in Get-Content "D:\Evidence\Output\extracted_hashes.txt") {
vt file $hash --format json | Select-Object -Property meaningful_name, last_analysis_stats
}
# Check hashes against CIRCL hashlookup
foreach ($hash in Get-Content "D:\Evidence\Output\extracted_hashes.txt") {
Invoke-RestMethod -Uri "https://hashlookup.circl.lu/lookup/sha1/$hash"
}
# Cross-reference with NSRL to identify known-good vs. unknown
# Unknown hashes that are not in NSRL warrant closer investigationStep 5: Analyze Program Entries for Unauthorized Installations
Review the ProgramEntries.csv for software the attacker may have installed:
Key columns in ProgramEntries:
- ProgramName : Display name of installed application
- ProgramVersion : Version string
- Publisher : Software publisher
- InstallDate : When the program was installed
- Source : Installation source (msi, exe, etc.)
- UninstallKey : Registry uninstall path
- PathsList : Installation directoriesLook for:
- Remote access tools (AnyDesk, TeamViewer, ngrok, Chisel)
- Hacking tools (Mimikatz, PsExec, Cobalt Strike)
- Tunneling utilities (plink, socat, WireGuard)
- Programs installed during the incident window
- Programs installed to non-standard locations
Step 6: Analyze Driver Binaries for Rootkit Evidence
Review the DriverBinaries.csv for suspicious loaded drivers:
Key columns in DriverBinaries:
- DriverName : Name of the driver
- DriverInBox : Whether it shipped with Windows (false = third-party)
- DriverSigned : Whether the driver has a valid signature
- DriverTimeStamp : Compilation timestamp
- Product : Product associated with the driver
- ProductVersion : Driver version
- SHA1 : Hash of the driver binaryFilter for DriverInBox = false and DriverSigned = false to find unsigned third-party drivers that may be rootkits or vulnerable drivers used in BYOVD (Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver) attacks.
Step 7: Build a Timeline from Amcache Data
Combine Amcache data with other artifacts for a comprehensive timeline:
# Merge Amcache CSV with other EZ Tools output using Timeline Explorer
# Load the following CSVs into Timeline Explorer:
# - Amcache_AssociatedFileEntries.csv (file evidence)
# - Amcache_ProgramEntries.csv (install evidence)
# - Prefetch output from PECmd.exe (execution evidence)
# - ShimCache output from AppCompatCacheParser.exe (execution evidence)
# Sort all entries by timestamp to reconstruct the attack sequence
# Timeline Explorer supports multi-file loading and column-based sorting
# Export the combined timeline
# File > Save to CSV > combined_timeline.csvKey Concepts
Verification
- [ ] Amcache.hve and transaction logs (LOG1, LOG2) were collected from the forensic image
- [ ] AmcacheParser produced all expected CSV output files without errors
- [ ] SHA-1 hashes were extracted and checked against VirusTotal or CIRCL hashlookup
- [ ] Unsigned executables in suspicious paths have been flagged for further analysis
- [ ] Program entries show all software installations within the incident window
- [ ] Driver binaries have been checked for unsigned or out-of-box entries
- [ ] LinkDate vs. FileKeyLastWriteTimestamp comparison has been performed to detect timestomping
- [ ] Amcache findings are correlated with Prefetch and ShimCache for execution confirmation
- [ ] Final timeline integrates Amcache data with other forensic artifacts
More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
- Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
- Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
- Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
- Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
- Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
- Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
- Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
- Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
- Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
- Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
- Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.