analyzing-ransomware-leak-site-intelligence skill
Safely monitor ransomware group Tor-hosted data leak sites (DLS) to collect and extract structured victim posting data, track group activity trends over time, and produce sector- and geography-specific ransomware risk assessments. Use when performing threat intelligence gathering on active ransomware groups or building proactive defense reporting from double-extortion leak-site activity.
Is the analyzing-ransomware-leak-site-intelligence skill safe?
Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 4 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
No findings.
Install the analyzing-ransomware-leak-site-intelligence skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/analyzing-ransomware-leak-site-intelligence ~/.claude/skills/analyzing-ransomware-leak-site-intelligence
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Analyzing Ransomware Leak Site Intelligence
Overview
Ransomware groups operating under double-extortion models maintain data leak sites (DLS) on Tor hidden services where they post victim names, stolen data samples, and countdown timers to pressure payment. In H1 2025, 96 unique ransomware groups were active, listing approximately 535 victims per month. Monitoring these sites provides intelligence on active threat groups, targeted sectors, geographic patterns, and emerging ransomware families. This skill covers safely collecting DLS intelligence, extracting structured data, tracking group activity trends, and producing sector-specific risk assessments.
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing ransomware leak site intelligence
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+ with requests, beautifulsoup4, pandas, matplotlib libraries
- Tor proxy (SOCKS5) for accessing .onion sites or commercial DLS monitoring feeds
- Understanding of ransomware double-extortion business model
- Familiarity with major ransomware families (Qilin, Akira, LockBit, BlackCat, Clop)
- Access to ransomware tracking feeds (Ransomwatch, RansomLook, DarkFeed)
Key Concepts
Double Extortion Model
Modern ransomware groups encrypt victim data AND exfiltrate it before encryption. Leak sites serve as public pressure: victims are listed with a countdown timer, partial data samples, and file trees. If ransom is not paid, full data is published. Some groups have moved to triple extortion, adding DDoS threats or contacting victims' customers directly.
DLS Intelligence Value
Leak sites provide: victim identification (company name, sector, country), attack timeline (when listed, deadline, data published), data volume estimates, group capability assessment (sectors targeted, attack frequency, operational tempo), and trend analysis (new groups emerging, groups rebranding, law enforcement takedowns).
Safe Collection Practices
Never directly access DLS sites in a production environment. Use purpose-built monitoring services (Ransomwatch, DarkFeed, KELA, Flashpoint), Tor-isolated research VMs, commercial threat intelligence platforms, or community-maintained datasets. All analysis should be conducted in isolated environments with proper authorization.
Workflow
Step 1: Ingest Ransomware Leak Site Data from Public Feeds
import requests
import json
import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from collections import Counter
class RansomwareIntelCollector:
"""Collect ransomware DLS intelligence from public tracking sources."""
RANSOMWATCH_API = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joshhighet/ransomwatch/main/posts.json"
RANSOMWATCH_GROUPS = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/joshhighet/ransomwatch/main/groups.json"
def __init__(self):
self.posts = []
self.groups = []
def fetch_ransomwatch_data(self):
"""Fetch ransomware victim posts from ransomwatch."""
resp = requests.get(self.RANSOMWATCH_API, timeout=30)
if resp.status_code == 200:
self.posts = resp.json()
print(f"[+] Loaded {len(self.posts)} victim posts from ransomwatch")
else:
print(f"[-] Failed to fetch posts: {resp.status_code}")
resp = requests.get(self.RANSOMWATCH_GROUPS, timeout=30)
if resp.status_code == 200:
self.groups = resp.json()
print(f"[+] Loaded {len(self.groups)} ransomware group profiles")
return self.posts
def get_recent_victims(self, days=30):
"Step 2: Analyze Group Activity and Trends
def analyze_group_trends(posts, top_n=15):
"""Analyze ransomware group activity trends."""
group_counts = Counter(p.get("group_name", "unknown") for p in posts)
monthly_activity = {}
for post in posts:
try:
date = datetime.fromisoformat(
post.get("discovered", "").replace("Z", "+00:00")
)
month_key = date.strftime("%Y-%m")
group = post.get("group_name", "unknown")
if month_key not in monthly_activity:
monthly_activity[month_key] = Counter()
monthly_activity[month_key][group] += 1
except (ValueError, TypeError):
continue
analysis = {
"total_posts": len(posts),
"unique_groups": len(group_counts),
"top_groups": group_counts.most_common(top_n),
"monthly_totals": {
month: sum(counts.values())
for month, counts in sorted(monthly_activity.items())
},
"monthly_top_groups": {
month: counts.most_common(5)
for month, counts in sorted(monthly_activity.items())
},
}
print(f"\n=== Ransomware Group Activity ===")
print(f"Total vicStep 3: Sector and Geographic Risk Assessment
def assess_sector_risk(posts, target_sector=None, target_country=None):
"""Assess ransomware risk for specific sector or geography."""
sector_data = {}
country_data = {}
for post in posts:
# Extract sector if available (not all feeds include this)
sector = post.get("sector", post.get("industry", "unknown"))
country = post.get("country", "unknown")
if sector not in sector_data:
sector_data[sector] = {"count": 0, "groups": Counter(), "recent": []}
sector_data[sector]["count"] += 1
sector_data[sector]["groups"][post.get("group_name", "")] += 1
if country not in country_data:
country_data[country] = {"count": 0, "groups": Counter()}
country_data[country]["count"] += 1
country_data[country]["groups"][post.get("group_name", "")] += 1
# Sector risk scoring
total = len(posts)
risk_assessment = {
"total_victims": total,
"sectors": {},
"countries": {},
}
for sector, data in sorted(sector_data.items(), key=lambda x: -x[1]["count"]):
pct = (data["count"] / total * 100) if total > 0 else 0
risk_assessment["sectors"][sectStep 4: Track Emerging and Rebranding Groups
def track_new_groups(posts, lookback_days=90):
"""Identify newly emerged ransomware groups."""
group_first_seen = {}
for post in posts:
group = post.get("group_name", "")
try:
date = datetime.fromisoformat(
post.get("discovered", "").replace("Z", "+00:00")
)
if group not in group_first_seen or date < group_first_seen[group]["first_seen"]:
group_first_seen[group] = {
"first_seen": date,
"first_victim": post.get("post_title", ""),
}
except (ValueError, TypeError):
continue
cutoff = datetime.now() - timedelta(days=lookback_days)
new_groups = {
group: info for group, info in group_first_seen.items()
if info["first_seen"].replace(tzinfo=None) >= cutoff
}
# Count total victims per new group
for group in new_groups:
victims = [p for p in posts if p.get("group_name") == group]
new_groups[group]["total_victims"] = len(victims)
new_groups[group]["avg_per_month"] = round(
len(victims) / max(1, lookback_days / 30), 1
)
print(f"\n=== New GrStep 5: Generate Intelligence Report
def generate_ransomware_intel_report(trends, risk, new_groups):
"""Generate ransomware threat intelligence report."""
report = f"""# Ransomware Threat Intelligence Report
Generated: {datetime.now().isoformat()}
## Executive Summary
- **Total victims tracked**: {trends['total_posts']}
- **Active ransomware groups**: {trends['unique_groups']}
- **New groups (last 90 days)**: {len(new_groups)}
## Top Active Groups
| Rank | Group | Victims |
|------|-------|---------|
"""
for i, (group, count) in enumerate(trends["top_groups"][:10], 1):
report += f"| {i} | {group} | {count} |\n"
report += "\n## New Emerging Groups\n"
for group, info in sorted(new_groups.items(), key=lambda x: -x[1]["total_victims"])[:10]:
report += f"- **{group}**: {info['total_victims']} victims since {info['first_seen'].strftime('%Y-%m-%d')}\n"
report += "\n## Sector Risk Assessment\n"
report += "| Sector | Victims | % | Risk Level |\n|--------|---------|---|------------|\n"
for sector, data in list(risk["sectors"].items())[:10]:
report += f"| {sector} | {data['victim_count']} | {data['percentage']}% | {data['risk_level'].upper()} |\n"
report += """
## Validation Criteria
- Ransomware victim data ingested from public tracking feeds
- Group activity trends analyzed with monthly breakdowns
- Sector and geographic risk assessment produced
- New and emerging groups identified with activity metrics
- Intelligence report generated with actionable recommendations
- All collection conducted through authorized public sources
References
- Ransomwatch GitHub
- SOCRadar: Top Ransomware Statistics 2025
- Bitsight: Ransomware & Deep Web Trends
- Sophos: Threat Intelligence Report 2025
- H-ISAC: Ransomware Data Leak Sites Report
- CYFIRMA: Weekly Intelligence Reports
More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
- Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
- Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
- Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
- Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
- Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
- Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
- Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
- Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
- Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
- Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
- Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.