Mmcp.market

analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics skill

by mukul975·mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills·34k stars·Apache-2.0

Parse Microsoft Outlook PST and OST files using libpff and pst-utils to extract message content, headers, attachments, deleted items, and MAPI metadata, including recovery of items from the Recoverable Items folder. Use when conducting email forensic investigations, legal e-discovery, or incident response that requires reconstructing communication patterns or tracing message routing from Outlook archives.

A100/100content scan

Is the analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics skill safe?

Clean: nothing in its files matched our rules. We read 6 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.

No findings.

Install the analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics skill

A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills
cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics ~/.claude/skills/analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics
available in every project

In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub

The instructions your agent would load

SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub

Analyzing Outlook PST for Email Forensics

Overview

Microsoft Outlook PST (Personal Storage Table) and OST (Offline Storage Table) files are critical evidence sources in digital forensics investigations. PST files store email messages, calendar events, contacts, tasks, and notes in a proprietary binary format based on the MAPI (Messaging Application Programming Interface) property system. Forensic analysis of these files enables recovery of deleted emails (from the Recoverable Items folder), extraction of email headers for tracing message routes, analysis of attachments for malware or exfiltrated data, and reconstruction of communication patterns. Modern PST files use Unicode format with 4KB pages and can grow up to 50GB, while legacy ANSI format is limited to 2GB.

When to Use

  • When investigating security incidents that require analyzing outlook pst for email forensics
  • When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
  • When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
  • When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques

Prerequisites

  • libpff/pffexport (open-source PST parser)
  • Python 3.8+ with pypff or libratom libraries
  • MailXaminer, Forensic Email Collector, or SysTools PST Forensics (commercial)
  • Microsoft Outlook (optional, for native PST access)
  • Sufficient disk space for extracted content

PST File Locations

Analysis with Open-Source Tools

libpff / pffexport

# Export all items from PST file
pffexport -m all evidence.pst -t exported_pst

# Export only email messages
pffexport -m items evidence.pst -t exported_emails

# Export recovered/deleted items
pffexport -m recovered evidence.pst -t recovered_items

# Get PST file information
pffinfo evidence.pst

Python PST Analysis

import pypff
import os
import json
import hashlib
import email
import sys
from datetime import datetime
from collections import defaultdict


class PSTForensicAnalyzer:
    """Forensic analysis of Outlook PST/OST files."""

    def __init__(self, pst_path: str, output_dir: str):
        self.pst_path = pst_path
        self.output_dir = output_dir
        os.makedirs(output_dir, exist_ok=True)
        self.pst = pypff.file()
        self.pst.open(pst_path)
        self.messages = []
        self.attachments = []
        self.stats = defaultdict(int)

    def process_folder(self, folder, folder_path: str = ""):
        """Recursively process PST folders and extract messages."""
        folder_name = folder.name or "Root"
        current_path = f"{folder_path}/{folder_name}" if folder_path else folder_name

        for i in range(folder.number_of_sub_messages):
            try:
                message = folder.get_sub_message(i)
                msg_data = self.extract_message(message, current_path)
                if msg_data:
                    self.messages.append(msg_data)
                    self.stats["total_messages"] += 1
            except Exception as e:
                sel

Email Header Analysis

Key headers for forensic investigation:

References

  • MailXaminer PST Forensics: https://www.mailxaminer.com/blog/outlook-pst-file-forensics/
  • libpff Documentation: https://github.com/libyal/libpff
  • PST File Format Specification: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/officefileformats/ms-pst/
  • SANS Email Forensics: https://www.sans.org/blog/email-forensics/

Example Output

$ pffexport /evidence/jsmith_archive.pst -t /analysis/pst_output

pffexport 20231205 - libpff PST/OST Export Tool
=================================================
Input: /evidence/jsmith_archive.pst (2.3 GB)

Exporting PST contents...
  Folders:       45
  Messages:      12,456
  Attachments:   3,234
  Contacts:      567
  Calendar:      234
  Tasks:         89

Export completed in 3m 42s.

$ python3 pst_analyzer.py /analysis/pst_output /analysis/email_report

PST Forensic Analysis Report
==============================
Source: jsmith_archive.pst (john.smith@corporate.com)
Date Range: 2023-06-01 to 2024-01-18

--- Mailbox Statistics ---
  Total Emails:       12,456
  Sent:               4,567
  Received:           7,889
  With Attachments:   3,234
  Deleted (recovered): 234

--- Phishing / Suspicious Emails ---
Email #8923
  Date:        2024-01-15 14:30:22 UTC
  From:        "IT Support" <it-support@c0rporate-help.com>
  To:          john.smith@corporate.com
  Subject:     Urgent: Password Reset Required
  Headers:
    Return-Path:    bounce@mail-relay.c0rporate-help.com
    X-Originating-IP: 203.0.113.55
    Received:       from mail-relay.c0rporate-help.com (203.0.113.55)
    SP

More skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

  • Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
  • Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
  • Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
  • Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
  • Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
  • Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
  • Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
  • Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
  • Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
  • Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
  • Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
  • Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

All agent skills → · MCP servers