AI Context Kit MCP server
Lint, measure, and sync AI context files across Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot.
8 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed AI Context Kit yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
AI Context Kit tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-09-28 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan5 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 5 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Install AI Context Kit in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
Runs npx -y ai-context-kit on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.
claude mcp add ai-context-kit -- npx -y ai-context-kit
What the publisher says
From the AI Context Kit repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
ai-context-kit
How do you measure the token cost of your context?
You spent hours writing the perfect .md context file, just to find out that your agent got worse. That's not a bug. That's what happens when nobody measures the cost of context.
You write a CLAUDE.md. Then someone adds .cursor/rules/. Then a teammate drops in an AGENTS.md. Then someone copies in a .cursorrules file from a blog post. Nobody removes the old ones.
Six months later your project has four context files that overlap, contradict each other, and dump 8,000 tokens of directory listings and "follow best practices" into every conversation. Your agent follows all of it. It gets slower. It gets confused. You blame the model.
An ETH Zurich study (February 2026) measured what actually happens when you give agents context files:
- Auto-generated context files reduced task success compared to providing nothing
- Human-written ones only improved accuracy by 4%
- Inference costs jumped 20%+ from wasted tokens
- Performance dropped on some models because agents got too obedient - following unnecessary instructions instead of solving the actual problem
I kept hitting this in my own projects, so I built ai-context-kit - a toolkit to treat context like a budget. Measure it, trim it, inject only what the current task needs.
import { loadRules, measure, lint, select } from "ai-context-kit";
const rules = await loadRules("./");
measure(rules, 4000); // what does your context cost?
lint(rules); // conflicts? duplicates? dead weight?
select(rules, {
task: "fix auth bug", // only inject what matters
budget: 2000, // stay within token budget
});Quick Start
npm install ai-context-kitRun the CLI on any project to see what you're actually injecting:
npx ai-context-kit measureShortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
AI Context Kit: common questions
- Is AI Context Kit MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (92/100). Read the AI Context Kit safety report
- How do I install AI Context Kit?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does AI Context Kit need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is AI Context Kit maintained?
- The last commit was 20 days ago (2026-09-23). The latest release is v0.1.2.