Is Nanobanana MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan46 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truenanobanana_mcp_server-0.4.6/pyproject.toml: … "S603", # subprocess call without shell=True "S607", # starting subprocess with…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Nanobanana does
not reviewedGrowingA- SuperCMOMarketing media generation — image, video, voice — for AI agents. BYO keys.not reviewedGrowingB
- AetherwaveMusic, image, video and audio generation across top AI providers - one key, one credit pool.not reviewedGrowingB
