Is Synlake MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 low
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 172ms; handshake note: Streamable HTTP error: Error POSTing to endpoint: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32001,"message":"Missing Authorizati20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityAPI key sent as a header8/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Findings (1)
- lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 55/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Synlake does
- TerraVisionDraw cloud architecture diagrams with official AWS, Azure and GCP icons from a prompt or Terraform.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Cloud FinOps Skill & MCPCloud cost + FinOps knowledge for AI agents: AWS/Azure/GCP optimisation, AI spend, waste playbooks.not reviewedEstablishedA
nableLocal-first FinOps copilot: ask AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes and SaaS cost questions in your editor.not reviewedGrowingA