Is SatGate – Economic Firewall for AI Agents MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-01 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 100ms; handshake note: Error POSTing to endpoint (HTTP 403): {"error":"session_token_mismatch"}20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityAPI key sent as a header8/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what SatGate – Economic Firewall for AI Agents does
- three.ws Agent PaymentsGoverned x402 payment sessions: pay any endpoint with budget, allowlist & per-tx caps, no key.not reviewedEstablishedB
- Mpp32Payment layer for AI agents. One MCP, five protocols, thousands of paid APIs your agent can call.not reviewedEstablishedB
- PipRailBudget-bound x402 payment wallet for AI agents — pays HTTP 402 URLs, capped locally. No backend.not reviewedGrowingB
SatGate – Economic Firewall for AI Agents reviews, tools and install