Is PostgreSQL MCP Server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-01 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan279 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 3 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/codemode/types.js: …his access /\beval\s*\(/, // No eval() /\bFunction\s*\(/, // No Funct…
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what PostgreSQL MCP Server does
- PostgreSQLMCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.not reviewedEstablishedB
- PostgreSQL MCP ServerPostgreSQL MCP server - query, schema introspection, explain, and health checks for AI assistantsnot reviewedEstablishedB
- PostgresEnterprise PostgreSQL MCP server with NL queries, hybrid search (pgvector+BM25), and web UInot reviewedGrowingA
