Mmcp.market

Is Neo4j Memory MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

A85/100grade A

Passed every safety check we run. Maintained, authenticated, reachable, clean scan.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-01 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan7 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
  • Maintenancelast push 22 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year9/10
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what Neo4j Memory does

  • Codebase Memory
    Codebase knowledge graph for AI agents — 162 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens.
    C
  • State Memory MCP
    Persistent workflow graph server tracking tasks, decisions, spatial entities, and blockers.
    A

Neo4j Memory reviews, tools and install