Is MCPComp Diagnostics MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-22 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium1 low
- Code scan2 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
- Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10
Findings (2)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/scan.mjs: …s("Cloudflare")) return false; try { new Function(""); return true; } catch (_) { ret… - lowNo source repository listed
maint.no-repo
Overall 60/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what MCPComp Diagnostics does
spintax.net MCP serverWrite, validate, render and analyze spintax templates. Backed by @spintax/core. No auth.not reviewedGrowingA- Ticket DemoMCP server demo — tickets, schema discovery, auth, and PII gating. stdio + HTTP.not reviewedGrowingB
- GuardvibeDeterministic security layer your AI can't be. 472 rules, 39 tools, CLI + doctor + host audit.not reviewedGrowingC
