Is Inkog MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-09-28 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 medium
- Code scan33 source files scanned20/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 12 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (1)
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evaldist/utils/agent-detector.js: …ENSITIVE_PATTERNS = [ 'exec(', 'eval(', 'subprocess', 'os.system', …
Overall 74/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Inkog does
- Mastyf AIRuntime proxy for MCP security, cost governance & auditnot reviewedGrowingB
- WiresharkProfessional network analysis with tshark. Security audits, deep-dives, and threat detection.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Solana Security StandardScan Solana/Anchor code against the Solana Security Standard and serve the ruleset to MCP clients.not reviewedGrowingA